Commons:Deletion requests/2025/01/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

January 20

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


 Comment This is a photo that was originally uploaded to Flickr by the college who owns the public mural. We aren't sure if the original artists have agreed to freely license it or give the licensing rights to COD though. Should we give it the benefit over the doubt? Atomicdragon136 (talk) 04:41, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Dear A1Cafel, Thank you for pointing this out. I will try to delete the image immediately. I have no experience with this, so I would appreciate it if you could let me know. Utikt (talk) 06:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep after blur, I agree the copyrighted parts are not De Minimis enough, but I think they are minimal enough to be blurred. I think the photo should still be kept as it has educational value as to show what this building looks like. Tvpuppy (talk) 07:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Tvpupy, Thank you for your suggestion. I am not able to apply blur on my device. So I think removing it will solve the problem quickly. My apologies. Utikt (talk) 07:44, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote your name by mistake. We are very sorry. Utikt (talk) 07:45, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep This might fall under de minimis as the main subject is the building. I would agree with Tvpuppy that the advertisements are not insignificant in the photo, however, photos like File:Pokemon Jets.jpg have been allowed. Atomicdragon136 (talk) 05:55, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The GJSTU license only applies to the website of the Japanese Embassy in Malaysia, not the Facebook account A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The GJSTU license only applies to the website of the Japanese Embassy in Malaysia, not the Facebook account A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. See both Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2025/01#Discrepancy regarding a Ukrainian monument and the newly-closed nomination here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 04:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ANSI symbols/signs/standards are not inellgible or in the public domain ( Especailly as with these they seem to be directly sourced).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:36, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn due to views expressed off and on wiki by other contributors. I still hold that the sign/symbol set may be a potential copyright issue, but given the views expressed elsewhere I apparently lack the expertise to effectively make a strong argument to continue DR's like these in their current from. If other contributors have the confirmation that these are in fact freely licensable as opposed to being copyright violations, please update the files concerned. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are these safety labels really PD-ineligible? I am relisting this since it was closed as withdrawn by the original nominator. Atomicdragon136 (talk) 04:32, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-incidental presence of the copyrighted photograph Hero (version 1507 to version 1809) and Img2 (Windows 10). Current copyright is held by Microsoft. If the images can still be used, blurring is possible.

茅野ふたば (talk) 06:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed on deleting these 3 pictures (not the whole category, of course). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Palucy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No metadata, likely not own work, enwiki this draft was deleted.

茅野ふたば (talk) 06:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer or rights holder is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

La personne qui a téléversé l'image n'en possède pas les droits suffisants pour la publier sous une licence libre. – The person who uploaded the photo does not own sufficient rights to publish it under free licence, Mussklprozz (talk) 08:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paintings by artist who passed away in 1985 (Antonio Gómez Cano (Q5698589)), not out of copyright, no permission.

Nutshinou Talk! 08:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope, unused user page image. SimmeD (talk) 09:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope, unused user page image. SimmeD (talk) 09:31, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Painting by artist who passed away in 2002 (Pino Ojeda (Q5688062)), not out of copyright, no permission. Nutshinou Talk! 09:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

not in public domaon. Picasso died less than 70 years ago Zen 38 (talk) 10:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no permission from listed photographer given - Vincent Schriel Hoyanova (talk) 10:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is a foto made by myself. Please don't remove it.
Vincent Vincent (talk) 10:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a gallery page without any image or other media. It has only a redirect to the category with the same name. So I think it is redundant. JopkeB (talk) 10:48, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused low resolution logos. 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


This file was initially tagged by Sjoerddebruin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://giethoorn.com/vakantiepark-giethoorn/
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. The provided hit[1] is markedly younger than our upload, though it has higher resolution. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The pronunciation may not be standard, because it has been repeatedly removed by editors Thyj (talk) 12:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COM:INUSE. If you know it's wrong, delete it from the page where it's being used. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Removed. Thyj (talk) 10:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded better version of this file Jáchym Opavský (talk) 13:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded better version of this file (with better quality) Jáchym Opavský (talk) 13:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COM:Derivative work of copyrighted character and artwork: https://vocaloid.fandom.com/fr/wiki/Fichier:Ofclboxart_cfm_Hatsune_Miku-illu.png Nutshinou Talk! 14:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COM:Derivative work of copyrighted character and artwork: https://vocaloid.fandom.com/fr/wiki/Fichier:Kagamine_Rin.png Nutshinou Talk! 14:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No explicit mention of a suitable license. RajatonRakkaus (talk) 15:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama for temporary works in Germany.

Lukas Beck (talk) 15:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Restricted use (manuscripts)

[edit]

Genty, Robert (1910-2001)

[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Genty, Robert (1910-2001)

Marin, Louis (1871-1960)

[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Marin, Louis (1871-1960)

Monod, Théodore (1902-2000)

[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Monod, Théodore (1902-2000)

Moréteau, Jules-Louis (1886-1956)

[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Moréteau, Jules-Louis (1886-1956)

Schmitt, Florent (1870-1958)

[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Schmitt, Florent (1870-1958)

Don Bernard Lanne (die after 1959)

[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Don Bernard Lanne

Discussion

[edit]

No public domain in France. Gzen92 (talk) 15:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 15:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 15:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 15:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Advertising Fenikals (talk) 15:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 3D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 15:57, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 15:57, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Original image preferred over this cropped img Rim sim (talk) 16:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment INUSE. Maybe the "intermediate version" File:Against the wall (14431995606) (cropped).png should be deleted instead. Taylor 49 (talk) 17:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Хочу загрузить в более лучшем изображении Dawow (talk) 16:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright? Is the user the same person as Michell Parnes? See this page. Wouter (talk) 16:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The eye part of the logo does not meet COM:TOO Taiwan. Saimmx (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the logo is over TOO in Taiwan, File:FTV One.png and File:FTV Show Group.png might be the subject of deletion as well. Saimmx (talk) 17:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd presume they'd all have to be deleted per COM:TOO Taiwan. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:18, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 3D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Permission for these files is in the form of a PDF file on somebody's Google Drive, presumably that of the uploader. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photography concluded in 2023 that the text they were using was unsuitable for Commons for including this clause:

[name] reserves the right to prevent this photo from being used in violation of the law-in particular, for defamation, humiliation of honor and dignity, violation of the rules of use of trademarks, violation of the right to protection of a citizen’s image, etc.

I don't know if this is a situation where we reject the licence because the photographer phrased their statement with restrictions which would limit its reuse, or one where we ignore their restrictions and host the image without them, because saying the magic words "CC-BY licence" means that they can't put further restrictions on that, even if they didn't realise this. (I also don't know whether a handwritten signature on a PDF file is considered sufficient by Commons for confirming a person's permission.)

Commons:Volunteer Response Team#Email message template for release of rights to a file suggests a suitable wording for such release statements.

Belbury (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak delete per precautionary principle, permission seems suspicious. Atomicdragon136 (talk) 05:58, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Likely above threshold of originality in Japan Trade (talk) 17:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What part? The globe? Is that really copyrightable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Incorrect license information, possibly copyrighted. Xoocit (talk) 17:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect license information, possibly copyrighted. Xoocit (talk) 17:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect license information and source, possibly copyrighted. Xoocit (talk) 17:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The same as File:YaranKudeta3Esfand1299.jpg Yousiphh (talk) 18:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copyright violation: this is the work of a photograph who, to the best of my knowledge, did not send a formal authorisation. Antimuonium (talk) 18:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A qui faut-il envoyer cette autorisation ? Etiennekyo (talk) 19:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:22, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Miguel Costa Ramalho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old images uploaded as self CC-BY-SA, but with no mention about the original museum/archive/source authorization. Not sure if these uploads are OK.

stanglavine msg 19:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

+File:Extração de madeira em São Domingos.jpg here. stanglavine msg 19:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Miguel Costa Ramalho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Aerial images with no metadata, not sure if they are self-created as stated. All uploads of this user have similar problems.

stanglavine msg 19:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Free license isn't mentioned explicitly for this source, picture was uploaded because of misleading info I have received RajatonRakkaus (talk) 19:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Free license isn't mentioned explicitly for this source, picture was uploaded because of misleading info I have received RajatonRakkaus (talk) 19:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Free license isn't mentioned explicitly for this source, picture was uploaded because of misleading info I have received RajatonRakkaus (talk) 19:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Free license isn't mentioned explicitly for this source, picture was uploaded because of misleading info I have received RajatonRakkaus (talk) 19:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Free license isn't mentioned explicitly for this source, picture was uploaded because of misleading info I have received RajatonRakkaus (talk) 19:24, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Free license isn't mentioned explicitly for this source, picture was uploaded because of misleading info I have received RajatonRakkaus (talk) 19:24, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Free license isn't mentioned explicitly for this source, picture was uploaded because of misleading info I have received RajatonRakkaus (talk) 19:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Coree lutii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Personal fiction

Enyavar (talk) 19:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

avalible at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Normandyx.jpg Wvdp (talk) 20:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hamzajanah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: images related to speedily deleted content on arwiki and enwiki.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:31, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hayapawa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: fictitious emblems and personal images.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:41, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Hayapawa#c-Omphalographer-20250120204100-Files_uploaded_by_Hayapawa_(talk_·_contribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hayapawa (talk • contribs) 13:01, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Omphalographer (talk) 16:54, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

درخواست حذف عکس را دارم به دلیل تخریب پایین عکس. با تشکر Mostafameraji (talk) 20:45, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am the creator of this map, and I have posted it here. There are some errors in the map, so in order not to mislead people, I ask you to remove it from here. Łarčwakh (talk) 20:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © 2020-2025 Grupo Nuevo Mundo Guatemala. Todos los Derechos Reservados. Yann (talk) 20:50, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © 2020-2025 Grupo Nuevo Mundo Guatemala. Todos los Derechos Reservados. Yann (talk) 20:50, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

copyrighted architectural drawing without source Ske (talk) 21:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

copyrighted architectural drawing without source Ske (talk) 21:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

copyrighted architectural drawing without source Ske (talk) 21:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

copyrighted architectural drawing without source Ske (talk) 21:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Personal art and derivative of copyrighted characters  REAL 💬   21:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Highly dubious map about German post WW2-plans. Reddit in general named as source; supposed creation date "1918". Appears to be fictional and/or a CopyVio. Enyavar (talk) 21:11, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:The-partition-of-ingria-after-axis-victory-in-ww2-1970-v0-7vhxoissbfod1.webp --Enyavar (talk) 21:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete the latter as copyvio; this map is scanned from the 1957 book "German rule in Russia, 1941-1945: a study of occupation policies", page 55. It's not fictional, but it is a copyvio. Omphalographer (talk) 21:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh cool, the second map will already be PD by 2071. --Enyavar (talk) 00:39, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 21:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't depict the k2 phonebox as stated in title and description - seems like an accidental upload? (user's only submission) RedAuburn (talk) 21:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could be useful if the view is identified and the filename is changed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Signature of another person by definition cannot be own work. Real source is needed to verify, that this is Angelyne's signature and not uploader's own invention. Taivo (talk) 21:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]