User talk:Smial/Archive/2020

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony NEX 5 RF Rokkor 5.6 250mm Adapter MD-NEX IMGP6129.jpg smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florian Ostertag (Haldern Pop 2013) IMGP2164 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 23:07, 4 January 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 20:23, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Esp m2 esp 8285 IoT module scale IMGP2965 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gute Qualität, alles gut sichtbar und scharf --PantheraLeo1359531 12:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! USB 3.1 GEN2 Key-A front panel connector IMGP3038 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AMD Ryzen 7 3700X top IMGP3165 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AMD Ryzen 7 3700X pins IMGP3168 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amd epyc 7302 top side scale IMGP3335 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Canceling edits without a description is the abolition of vandalism. Do you think my renaming requests are vandalism? — Ирука¹³ 12:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Ganz klar, deine Umbenennungsanträge sind Vandalismus. --Ralf Roletschek 12:59, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

• Yes, I do. Disruptive vandalism by completely meaningless renaming approaches. My file naming is /allways/ meaningful, further information can be found in the file description, whzich is machine readable, and additional information can occasionally be found in the files categories. It is absolutly unnessesary and disruptive, to copy parts of the description to the file name and at the same time to destroy information in the file name, wthat does not belong to the file description, but are essential for the photographer. Please read and understand https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:File_renaming#Which_files_should_be_renamed? .--Smial (talk) 13:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
  • My rename requests, you think, contradict COM:FR? — Ирука¹³ 13:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Please read and understand https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:File_renaming#Which_files_should_be_renamed? . --Smial (talk) 13:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Do you refuse to continue talking with me and refuse to answer my questions? — Ирука¹³ 13:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Have you read and understood https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:File_renaming#Which_files_should_be_renamed? ?--Smial (talk) 13:33, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Yes. My rename requests, you think, contradict COM:FR? — Ирука¹³ 13:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Please read and understand https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smial&diff=405037846&oldid=405036871 Nothing more to comment. --Smial (talk) 13:42, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amd socket sp3 IMGP3469 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 00:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amd epyc 7302 supermicro H11SSL-NC IMGP3532 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:47, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amd epyc 7302 socket sp3 IMGP3493 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:51, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Smial. Da ich ein "dokumentarisch orientierter Fotograf" bin, so versuche ich meine Umwelt flächenhaft zu erfassen. Das bringt es mit sich, dass ich auch Trafostationen oder Strommasten fotografiere, nicht nur wenn sie besondere Bauformen haben, sondern auch einen von 50 baugleichen anderen dieser Trasse, wenn er zufällig gerade an meinem Weg steht. Meine Frage ist nun, wer sich für solche Bilder interessiert und was sojemand damit macht bzw. wie er sie auswertet. Für mich als Fotograf wäre das interessant ggf. kann man auch die gewünschte Information auch bereits beim hochladen beifügen und dabei die Auswertung erleichtern. Da du auch Strommasten fotografierst, was weißt du darüber? --Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 13:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Jeder Hochspannungsmast hat eine Kennnummer. Ich kenne die Systematik dahinter nicht, aber wenn man sie sehen und notieren kann, könnte das in der Datebeschreibung für irgendjemanden auf der Welt nützlich sein. Ansonsten: Objektkoordinaten oder zumindest Kameraposition ermitteln, einbinden, wie auch immer. Auf Openstreetmap kann man Masten mit Nummern finden, wenn auch nicht überall. Ich habe das nie konsequent gemacht. Aber es ist schon mal mindestens eins meiner Mastenfotos umbenannt worden (was mich immer noch jedes mal ärgert, denn Detailbeschreibungen gehören in die Bildbeschreibung hinein. Umbenennungen, weil irgendeine Kleinigkeit "nicht schön" genug ist, gehören verboten...), weil jemandem der Dateiname zu unspezifisch war, also scheint es Menschen zu geben, die sich für die präzisen Bezeichnungen interessieren... --Smial (talk) 13:58, 5 April 2020 (UTC) Hier z.B. hat der linke MAst eine Nummer ("ref=4330 M 39", sieht man in der Standardkarte nicht, nur beim Bearbeiten), der rechte nicht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.58252/7.69122 --Smial (talk) 14:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Ich versuche immer die Kennummer und andere Tafeln am Strommasten zu fotografieren und diese Information im Dateinamen und in der Beschreibung unterzubringen. Wenn ich mehrere Fotos mache, lege ich auch eine Kategorie an. Koordinaten sind natürlich immer eine Option, aber aufgrund der Vielzahl an Aufnahmen kriegt nur die Kategorie eine Objektkoordinate. Wahrscheinlich wird es dann auch über kurz oder lang was auf Wikidata dazu geben. WikishootMe kann dann auch zeigen, welche Masten Bilder und Kategorien haben.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 14:31, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cpu cooler Supermicro SNK-P0064AP4 IMGP3440 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sas and sata connectors on supermicro H11SSL-NC IMGP3544 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:49, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Selbstschneidende Schraube mit Sechskantkopf kombiniert mit PH2 focus stack IMGP3818 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 15:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oszilloskop Tastkopf 10x IMGP3769 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 16:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spiralbohrersatz imgp3886-imgp3892 stack smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:52, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Factory new and worn bit PH2 imgp3833-imgp3848 stack smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:52, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfgang (Die Kassierer) (Ruhrpott Rodeo 2013) IMGP5267 smial wp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Refreshing :) --Poco a poco 19:16, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Smial,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

I applaud your remarks in QI.

It is a very frustrating place. My current picture in Consensual Review is a classic example. It went into Consensual Review because a reviewer said it was unsharp and the building walls were not vertical. None of the current reviewers now thinks it's unsharp and, against my better judgment, I made the walls vertical (this makes the top of tall buildings balloon out). The first reviewer has not relented. Now someone has chimed it to say the walls are not absolutely, perfectly vertical. It was so close he had to provide a technique for people to be able to see this tiny amount. This is the classical nit picking that goes on. I don't think I've had a single image that went into Consensual Review come out alive. Several were given thumbs down saying "over processed." That term has no meaning others can understand and one of these had no processing other than straightening and cropping. When using this ambiguous term people should explain specifically the problem they see. Something like, 'the lighthouse is over-saturated' -- Jim Evans (talk) 15:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind words. I myself have already presented and propagated techniques for perspective equalization (ShiftN) and denoising of photos (NeatImage) at photo workshops in 2007/2008. But the participants at that time will certainly confirm (I hope so, at least...) that I have always combined this with warnings that all these techniques have technical and especially aesthetic limits. I am quite of the opinion that verticals in architectural photos should also be shown vertically, but please only as long as the results do not look absurd and unnatural. However, many of the people involved on QIC seem to completely lack a "photographic" view. So some dogmas based on pixel counting have become established there. Make sure that your frustration does not get out of hand, argue patiently and always objectively. It is possible to achieve change: Some time ago, photos with high ISO settings were generally rejected with the argument "too much noise", even when sports photos or concert photos could not be created any other way. In the meantime the same "mistake" is mostly accepted, but for this change many discussions had to be held... --Smial (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Your contribution to this project has been noticed. A file Zoom prinzip.gif, which was uploaded by you, has been nominated to be displayed on the Main Page of this project as a Media of the Day. You can view this and other nominations at Commons talk:Media of the day. It is always a good idea to let other contributors know when you think your file would look good as a featured media file, provide descriptions in different languages, and perhaps spread the joy by nominating media of other uploaders, that you believe deserve that. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Nabemba-2.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

User:Smial/NoFacebook has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly (talk) 08:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

		* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Smial/Archive! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)