Commons:Help desk

	SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 2 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 10 days.

Hello, I recently uploaded PDF file (HITK clubs.pdf) for the citation of my college clubs list in the Heritage Institute of technology, Kolkata article. So, the PDF I uploaded can it be used as a citation for the same? HridoyKundu (talk) 18:38, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is question that you should ask at the respective Wikipedia. Commons does not enforce any citation policy. Ruslik (talk) 20:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HridoyKundu: You don't need to upload images of sources you want to cite in a English Wikipedia article. English Wikipedia doesn't require sources cited in article be available online; it only requires that they be en:Wikipedia:Reliable sources (as defined by English Wikipedia). Moreover, such images like the PDF file you uploaded may be eligible for copyright protection regardless of whether they are considered reliable sources and uploading them to Commons could be considered a copyright violation. Why do you think the file you uploaded is OK to be license as {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}? You don't seem to have created the list yourself (you've attributed it to "Basab Chaudhuri (Principal of Heritage Institute of Technology, Kolkata)") and receiving a copy of the list via email doesn't mean it's not eligible for copyright protection and doesn't make you its copyright holder. Did you just choose a random license when you uploaded this file? Does it clearly state somewhere in the email your received or in the PDF itself that the list is released under a "cc-by-sa-2.5" license? Perhaps the file is OK for Commons, and only needs to be relicensed; it's hard, though, to determine that without knowing more information about the email you received. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:35, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So should I delete this? HridoyKundu (talk) 09:42, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am trying to add an informative article about our music producer work, but it gets flagged as self promotion. This surprises me, why are there millions of articles about other artists and gets our article removed? Thanks! Yourindubio (talk) 11:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Yourindubio. Sounds like you are trying to create a Dutch Wikipedia article but this place is Wikimedia Commons - the file repository. You need to ask over there, probably at nl:Help:Helpdesk. Commander Keane (talk) 12:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yourindubio: You might want to read nl:Wikipedia:Zelfpromotie. - Jmabel ! talk 23:44, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia, red-linked categories are not allowed on articles and are to be removed. Is it the same on the Commons? I removed some last month but should have asked first. I've seen a lot of them on here. Swinub (talk) 20:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Swinub: Either way; before removing them (here on on Wikipedia) you should consider whether they can usefully be created. Or whether they are typos. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or whether some existing category was intended. This comes up particularly often on a multilingual project like Commons. - Jmabel ! talk 00:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a small playlist on YouTube with traditional/patriotic Vietnamese songs, but I have no idea if they are copyrighted, an example of old Vietnamese patriotic music would be "Rừng xanh vang tiếng Ta Lư (Phương Nam) - Thúy Hà (1967)", which was posted there in 2022 by Vu Thanh, would he have to post the songs here or are he and I unable to post this on Commons? 實際 (talk) 21:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@實際: In general it is part of the job of the uploader to work out the copyright status. We would need both the underlying song and the particular performance to be either public domain or free-licensed.

There has never been a File:Rừng xanh vang tiếng Ta Lư (Phương Nam) - Thúy Hà (1967), so I don't know what you are referring to with that. - Jmabel ! talk 00:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot proceed to the next step as my image file will not upload no matter how many times I try to change the file name uniquely. Please help resolve this issue. Thank you. JillianSkyeJewett (talk) 00:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JillianSkyeJewett I am not really an expert in uploading but no one has replied thus far. Is there a particular error message popping up? Is the file showing up at Special:UploadStash? Are you on a mobile device or desktop? Give as much info as you can. Commander Keane (talk) 03:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file name you were trying to upload has been blacklisted because it is very common, uninformative, or spelled in ALLCAPS. Please go back and choose a better file name. When uploading files to Wikimedia Commons, please use a file name that describes the content of the image or media file you're uploading and is sufficiently distinctive that no-one else is likely to pick the same name by accident.

Examples of good file names:

Nodnol skyline from Nodnol City Hall - Aug 2022.jpg

1875 Meeting of Settlers at Falconer Bay, New Nodland.jpg

Pseudohedron with no vertex visible from center.png

Examples of bad file names:

Image01.png

Joe.jpg

DSC00001.JPG

Foo.svg.png

30996951316264l.jpg

PSEUDOHEDRON WITH NO VERTEX VISIBLE FROM CENTER.png

For more information, please see Commons:First steps/Upload form. If you have a good reason for uploading a file with this name, or if you receive this message when attempting to upload a new version of an existing file, please let us know at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard or directly at MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist. Be sure to specify the exact name of the file you are trying to upload. Thank you.

That is what keeps popping up. I continue to follow all steps and still the same message. Any next step? 47.20.56.84 23:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First step is sign back into your account. The second step is to try changing the filename. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 00:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now it says "You don't have permission to upload this file." when I click upload. JillianSkyeJewett (talk) 23:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you forgot to provide a license. You are not blocked. good luck. --Mateus2019 (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please advise on how I can change my subscription? I need to change the source of the funds.

My email address is (Redacted).

Thanks. Kmxsoft1 (jtalk) 13:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kmxsoft1: Do you mean your donations to Wikimedia? Then you should email bdonatewikimedia.org. What exactly do you mean by subscription? —Matrix(!) _{ping one}^{when replying} {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 15:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nowadays when I upload an image, let's say this one, I seem to get two edits generated in the "History", the first for the upload itself ("Uploaded own work with UploadWizard") and then immediately followed by another apparently auto-generated by the system, labelled something like "Changed label, description and/or aliases in en". It says that this second edit has added 231 bytes, or whatever, but when I click on the diff to see what has actually happened, it says "No changes". Does anyone know the purpose of this second edit? ITookSomePhotos (talk) 17:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The second edit is due to the way Upload wizard handles page creation. The edit added the caption, I'm unsure why it shows no changes on your view. I appreciate the concern, but its just the way image upload works, (there are other reasons, but its mainly for antivandalism/abuse filtering captions) and is completely normal. By the way, that's a great photo. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 17:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! If it's working as it's supposed to then I won't worry. But it's curious that you are seeing a change whereby the second edit added the caption. I see the caption displayed in the first version, prior to the second edit being applied, and the second version just looks identical. It's odd that we should be seeing different things. ITookSomePhotos (talk) 20:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I too can't see a difference in the caption box when viewing the two versions. Revision #946606343 shows an addition though. Confusing. Commander Keane (talk) 20:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For that revision, I see "No changes". However, I notice now that, very briefly, as the page loads, what could be the caption appears in the "blue" column, then it disappears too quickly to properly view, and, as I say "No changes" appears. Strange. ITookSomePhotos (talk) 20:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, es geht um mehrere Bilder, manche wurden mir von einer Studentenverbindung zugesandt, welche wohl die Rechte am Bild haben (und mir die Erlaubnis zum Hochladen gegeben haben) und bei manchen Bildern konnte ich sie durch eine Online- und Buchsuche finden.

Alle diese Bilder wurden um 1880-1920 erstellt, daher wäre meine Vermutung, dass ich gar keine Urheberschaft/Recht am Bild mehr angeben muss, da sie mittlerweile gemeinfrei sind. Stimmt das? Und falls das nicht so ist, welche wären die richtigen/einfachsten Lizenzen? --Alrael (talk) 18:25, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alrael: Für diejenigen vor 1904 können Sie verwenden {{PD-old-assumed}}. Für 1904 oder später, davon können Sie nicht ausgehen. - Jmabel ! talk 00:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wie ist das mit Bildschirmfotos oder Wappen/Logos/Insignien? Ich habe gelesen, dass es da besondere Lizenzarten gibt. Alrael (talk) 04:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alrael: (Mit etwas Hilfe von Google Translate) Wenn jemand anderes sie gezeichnet hat, funktionieren sie ziemlich genau so wie jeder andere Inhalt. Soweit ich weiß, sind alle «besondere Lizenzarten» für diejenigen, die Sie selbst aus einem Wappen zeichnen. - Jmabel ! talk 04:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vvdst_zirkel.jpg, hier steht was von 70 Jahren
• https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:VDSt_K%C3%B6nigsberg-Mainz.jpg, hier wurde einfach angegeben, dass keine Schöpfungshöhe erreicht wurde.

Wäre beides möglich und rechtlich ok? Alrael (talk) 09:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how do i make my photo public domain so i can post it? It is a photo I took myself and I would like to be able to use it as public domain Kaelinolson (talk) 21:19, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you are using the UploadWizard, it lets you choose from three licences. Following all the steps, check out the "Creative Commons CC0 Waiver" (learn more) button. Its wording includes "dedicated the work to the public domain". COM:PD has some further information. Commander Keane (talk) 22:35, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in mind that "public domain" means someone can reuse it without attributing it to you; you are giving up all rights by doing this. Jmabel ! talk 00:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

es una comunidad de la provincia Pedernales en República Dominicana. Cuenta con una población de más 7,688 hab.> año 2015 Carading (talk) 01:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Carading: ¿y su pregunta, relacionada a Wikimedia Commons es…? - Jmabel ! talk 05:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When submitting something for QI, the template asks to add a "very short description", but every now and then someone thinks this means 100 words or more. Because QI entries are vertically aligned, this creates a very lengthy entry to scroll past. Would regular Commons users be permitted to trim these down to a more reasonable size? ReneeWrites (talk) 07:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ReneeWrites, we are talking about the "Nomination" field for items at Commons:Quality images candidates. Currently the description is a signed comment so I don't think it is a good idea to edit them. Also, doesn't the discussion also take up a lot of vertical space sometimes? You could ask continual perpetrators to reduce their description lengths on their user talk pages I guess. Are you viewing on a desktop browser? On a mobile device, either in mobile mode or desktop mode, the long boxes don't bother me so much. I vaguely recall it looking odd on my computer though. Anyhoo, I am not a QI reviewer so my opinion doesn't count for much, I just peruse the page from time to time. Perhaps a technical solution would be to wrap the nom. and review in an expandable box with a [show more] button, thus all items would get the same vertical length. Commons talk:Quality images candidates is quite active you could ask there. Commander Keane (talk) 21:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been trying to delete a logo that is outdated for the company years back but the page is protected and its affecting our google search and brand a new one has been uploaded but the old one keep showing would appreciate the help Digitalqnb (talk) 08:01, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Digitalqnb: Old logos of notable companies aren't deleted on Commons, unless they break one of the policies here. But one thing you can do (and this is most likely what you're trying to achieve, anyway) is replace the old logo with the current one on the projects it's used on. If you scroll down the page of File:Qatar National Bank Logo.svg you can see all the pages it's being used on. ReneeWrites (talk) 09:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and replaced the old logo with the current one. I also added some categories to the logo you uploaded. ReneeWrites (talk) 09:51, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe ein Eisenkästchen erstanden worauf zwei mal ein Schriftsymbol eingeätzt ist neben der Verzierung. Kann mir jemand helfen herauszufinden woher das schöne Kästchen stammt und wie alt es ist? Guido Brander (talk) 15:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leider dies ist eine Seite mit Hilfe zur Nutzung von Wikimedia Commons und kein allgemeiner Informationsschalter. - Jmabel ! talk 22:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

einfach digital abfotografieren=digitalisieren und durch google images und/oder tineye jagen. Wenn das nicht hilft, einfach Kontakt mit einem entspr. Museum aufnehmen und dann das Objekt mitbringen. Eine andere Möglichkeit wäre ein guter Antiquitätenhänder. Oder Du lädst es irgendwo hoch und fragst Internetnutzer. Bin gespannt, was rauskommt... --Mateus2019 (talk) 17:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Besten Dank für die gut gemeinte Hilfe. Google habe ich ausprobiert, Antiquitätenhändler bin ich selbst, tineye muss ich probieren. Zur zeit versuche ich chinesische Kaligraphen zu erreichen. 2001:8E0:3C85:DD01:5C18:53E3:EB34:680E 10:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

There is a video that has been uploaded to YouTube under a Creative Commons licence, however in the description the channel claims that it has copyright over it. I was just wondering which copyright applies and if I can upload the video to Wikipedia Commons so that some images can be extracted from it.

Note: I can’t for some reason post the link in this comment but the video I am specially talking about is titled “ඇත්ත අර්බුදය එන්නේ 2024 දී – සුනිල් හදුන්නෙත්ති | Siyatha News” Titanciwiki (talk) 01:37, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is that Siyatha News? The "® Property of Voice of Asia Network (Pvt) Ltd - The Largest Media Network in Sri Lanka" is a registered trademark. It's not speaking to Copyright. If the channel owns the video, and they've released it under the CC-BY license, it is eligible for upload to Commons. Bastique ^{☎ let's talk!} 01:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright thank you guys! that cleared a lot of things up. Sorry if this is annoying (just want to be careful you know) I do have one other video where I'm unsure about uploading it to Wikipedia Commons. It's titled "ලාල් කාන්ත කියන කතා නෙමෙයි අනුර කුමාර කියන්නේ - තිස්ස අත්තනායක". The reason I ask is, despite the video being released under a creative commons license the description says "All rights reserved. No part of this video may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of Independent Television Network Ltd". Again sorry if this is a stupid question or should be straightforward, I'm just confused on why some organizations would claim "no part of this video may be reproduced... or transmitted in any form" and also release it under a creative commons license. Titanciwiki (talk) 02:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much anything with a Creative Commons license is copyrighted; otherwise, the license would be completely redundant. If an image is in the public domain, then no one could offer a meaningful license for it: only the copyright-holder can issue a license. - Jmabel ! talk 01:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to make sure my files upload! :) Patricktufts23 (talk) 03:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Patricktufts23 you can click on Special:ListFiles/Patricktufts23 to have a look at everything you have uploaded. When you are logged in there is a link called "Uploads" somewhere in the interface for you to click, takes you to the same place. Commander Keane (talk) 03:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I HAVE SOME IMAGES THAT I HAVE CREATED USING AI SHOULD I UPLOAD ?

Check the sample below

Thank you

[1]https://nexboy.com/images/WmpXmE/view Smartfixer1 (talk) 15:17, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartfixer1: Without discussing the provenance of this specific image, read the guidelines here: Commons:AI-generated media regarding AI, which is a bit of a complex matter, in which we are still having discussions. You may also want to rather than "can I", ask yourself "should I?" Bastique ^{☎ let's talk!} 15:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, Sorry for my bad english, please enlight me more about how can i upload an Ai images here, without having issue of deleting?

Thank you. Smartfixer1 (talk) 15:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review Commons:Project scope as well as Commons:AI-generated media to determine if is free-licensed media which is educationally useful for Wikimedia Commons. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:53, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartfixer1: Bastique wasn't commenting on your English, he was saying you were asking the wrong question. What they are saying is that "I created some things with AI, can I upload?" is like saying "I took some photos, can I upload?" The issue isn't whether they were created by AI; the question is whether they are in scope (useful for some educational purpose). - Jmabel ! talk 20:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Lise How to pronounce in Norwegian THomasStanley (talk) 17:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to be uploading a couple dozen images similar to File:Connection Machine CM-2 and DataVault at Computer Museum of America.png and have a few questions to make sure I'm following best practices on those future uploads:

• I'm not sure when to use Template:Archival version. Is it (still) good practice to upload two separate copies of images, with the advent of webp?
• I'm not sure that it is OK to use webp with Template:Compressed version. I thought it might adapt the text since there is a deprecated "filetype" parameter in the template, but instead, the template erroneously names the webp version as being a JPEG.
• I had hoped that by uploading a webp thumbnail, the image rendered in the infobox might retain a transparent background, so that it had better compatibility with Wikipedia's (relatively new) dark mode option. Unfortunately, on w:Connection Machine, the infobox thumbnail renders transparency as white. Is there a way to avoid this?
• Anything else I did wrong?

Thanks, Hubcapp (talk) 22:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I were doing this, I would one or another way upload the straight-from-the-camera photo as well. Not sure what the "best practice" is to do that for a PNG, but File:Gheorghe Petrașcu - K. H. Zambaccian (1927).jpg shows what I typically do for a JPG (note the upload history). - Jmabel ! talk 00:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to do that, but unfortunately the base of these images was a NEF file, which is a non‑free image format that Wikimedia can't accept. NEF is not merely a type of proprietary JPEG, but actually contains useful information to resample the photo with different exposure etc, pulling out information that can't be derived from the "Raw JPEG" that I also had the camera save at the same time. I'll likely upload these base NEF files to my personal website under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 license, and could include an external link to them on Wikimedia, if there's precedence for doing so. Hubcapp (talk) 03:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hubcapp I think linking to the raw files would appreciated as you can't follow Jmabel's outstanding practice of uploading the new processed file over the top of the original jpg.

Commons:Raw files (which I created the other day) doesn't mention a specific template to use for the personal website links and I couldn't find a relevant one in Category:External link templates. Commander Keane (talk) 03:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Normally it doesn't matter much to have the raw NEF, so I can understand that no one has been particularly interested in creating a template to provide the functionality of facilitating external link to source RAW File, but this object in particular really needs it, further than just being a hypothetical "best practice".

The Connection Machine CM-2 casing is Black, contrasting heavily with the array of bright and rapidly flashing red LEDs, making it a challenging object to photograph. It requires very high dynamic range, which DSLR cameras are not known for. Film photography does a lot better when high dynamic range is required (see the copyrighted image of this object at https://www.tamikothiel.com/cm/), while my poor $5000 2015 era DSLR needs every advantage it can get to try to compete, still struggling a bit with the varying angle of the LEDs in the final result. The "Raw JPEG" version of this exact same photo is a blurry mess where it is hard to discern any single LED, and it was only after processing the NEF that I realized I did actually get an acceptable shot of the CM-2.

I'm able to make a Template:RAW image link as long as it's not going to get me in trouble. It would probably be better if someone more established & familiar with Wikimedia culture were to make the template instead. — Hubcapp (talk) 04:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. Regarding Template:Compressed version, if you think it should be modified to accept webp and no no one spots your question here be sure to follow up at Commons:Village pump/Technical.
2. Regarding transparency, could it be related to Phab:T283646 which leads to this ImageMagick issue? It is too technical for me.

Commander Keane (talk) 05:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

100 year flood, helene, biltmore,nc biltmore village flooded. Wnc Green-eyed scotty (talk) 22:42, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Green-eyed scotty: Commons:First Steps. - Jmabel ! talk 00:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am trying to create an upload wizard with prefilled categories for my project "Commons:Dandari Photo Project(pilot)", I request somebody who has the upload wizard rights to help me with this ASAP.

Thank you. Nskjnv (talk) 06:34, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nskjnv: I would suggest that you actively contact people who have done similar tasks before. - Jmabel ! talk 19:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe gestern die "Stele "DE-STRUK-TION" ins Netz gestellt. Die Bezeichnung "SRRUK" ist falsch. Ich bitte darum, den Schreibfehler zu korrigieren. Karl Döringer (talk) 08:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 1 image i uploaded was from the city of terrebonne website and the other one was from a archived website for La Plaine and i dont know if its copyrighted i only did this to add more information of La Plaine. --Osamadidnothing (talk) 19:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Osamadidnothing: Hi, You need the formal written permission of the copyright holder before uploading files from the Internet. If you have such a permission, please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Yann (talk) 19:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder what car they are standing in front of in this picture:

Could someone identify it?

Ove Raul (talk) 22:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ove Raul, you could try Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

is it possible to upload a photo for this actresses' page? she deserves one i think, as her performance was highly acclaimed & the film won the academy award that year ("In the Heat of the Night"). i did upload a photo, but it went to a separate wiki page... Longhairofdeath (talk) 23:40, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Short version: you are out of luck.

Long version: It appears from English Wikipedia you successfully uploaded File:Quentin Dean as 'Delores Purdy'.jpg. Which directly ended up here at Wikimedia Commons which only accepts free content. However, you selected a licence for the file indicating "own work", and unless you made the film that is not correct. More likely, if it is a screenshot from a copyrighted film it is not free and will soon get deleted from Commons.

I think it is technically possible for you to insert the picture into the English Wikipedia article, but as I said it will get deleted here and then disappear from there too.

You might be able to find a freely licensed photo of Quentin Dean here already, or upload one you find.

If you want someone to source a free photo of this person you can request it, just let us know if you want help with the requests process.

I don't blame you for the mistake, the cross-wiki upload process is crappy, in fact I thought we turned it off. Commander Keane (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

gond culture Chandu677 (talk) 06:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chandu677: are you talking about Category:Gondi people? I suppose Category:Gondi culture could be created. There are other examples like Category:Australian Aboriginal culture. Commander Keane (talk) 07:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This question could be related to Category:Gussadi dance. Should the dance category be a subcat of Gondi people? We need someone with some relevant knowledge. Commander Keane (talk) 07:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

אם אני מצלמת צילום מסך מאתר אינטרנט של לוגו האם התמונה מפרה זכויות יוצרים < אסתר ברוק (talk) 07:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(דרך Google Translate:) כמעט תמיד. אתה יכול להיות יותר ספציפי? - Jmabel ! talk 11:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

אני רוצה לעלות תמונה של אתר חדשות עליו כתבתי ערך אבל אני לא מצליחה להבין איך אני יכולה לשים את התמונה מבלי להפר זכויות יוצרים 2A02:14F:17B:5CC6:615B:6588:71F3:1FDE 11:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(דרך Google Translate:) סביר להניח שזה לא אפשרי. רוב (אולי 95%, אולי יותר) של מה שיש באינטרנט הוא מוגן בזכויות יוצרים ולא ברישיון חופשי, ולכן אינו כשיר ל-Commons. - Jmabel ! talk 18:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

סגור אין בעיה טוב שאתה אומר לי תודה רבה…אז רק לידע כללי, לא הצלחתי להבין איך האנשים שכתבו ערכים בויקיפדיה כן צירפו תמונות של הלוגו והכל למה שהם כתבו ועוד כל מיני תמונות מהאתר לדוגמא בערך ״בוקרא״ אתר תקשורת ערבי… 2A02:14F:1F6:1EDE:D041:560E:871B:18AA 18:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Our Premier doesn’t know what she is doing 2604:3D09:7184:6A00:240B:5992:125B:7D9A 13:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to ask if anyone knows of any Malaysian government websites where photos of high-ranking officials (such as Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad) are available for free use? 161.142.148.174 17:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Generally, you visit a website and check for a "Copyright" section (usually there is a link at the bottom of the website) explaining if content is available under a free license.

For example the State of Queensland, Australia says CC BY 4.0 on its copyright page so most of the material is ok for Commons.

Brazil's Government website says at the bottom "All content on this site is published under license Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported." - not a free licence so not ok for Commons.

"© 2024 All Rights Reserved" means not free so not ok for Commons.

Is there a specific website you want us to look at?

I am not familiar with Malaysia so you may have to check the official website for the main government as well as each state and territory. Commander Keane (talk) 22:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Licensing covers all acceptable licenses. Keep is mind that Commons has a precautionary principle - if you are not certain about the licence, don't upload the file. Ask here for follow up questions. Commander Keane (talk) 22:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen wikipedia pages of albums by artists but I did not create the album cover so I am unsure if I am able to upload it. I am looking for a way to upload an album cover of the album "Beachboy" by McCafferty NiaZedCrasher (talk) 02:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest visiting w:Wikipedia:Upload/old and following the instructions if you can. Commander Keane (talk) 03:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unless it is either free-licensed or in the public domain (both unlikely) this will have nothing to do with Commons. - Jmabel ! talk 03:15, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to change the name of the user name because, by mistake, I added a letter. I need the user name to be Zanja Records, not Zanjar Records. It says that the name is already in use, but it does not exist when I search. Please help. Zanjar Records (talk) 03:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Zanjar Records: The account Zanja Records does exist. It was created in 2020 and its sole surviving contribution to Commons was to upload File:Zanja Records.tif. If you're planning to use your current account on English Wikipedia then your best approach is probably to choose a new name that will be acceptable there (see en:WP:U, specifically the parts about the name representing an individual and not a company) and then submit an unblock request as explained on en:User talk:Zanjar Records. --bjh21 (talk) 12:32, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The resource is how to get your stuff, but our resource is like a resources about like getting stuff at the printer without printing it and I just wanted to know if that will work for me Else, but if it does, I’m like so impressed cause they never worked for me and you know if you just I’m scared I know like I don’t know I’m saying I’m scared but it’s fine but I was like for an hour and an hour. I don’t know so like, I’m just confused. I’m not here for hours and hours. Can you get one thing before like anything like I mean anything it’s like anything like like like so like I went to the store to let go just make some I don’t know what is called, but it’s like compost spda and it was crazy there everybody was like a big line and then I was so literally and then my mom said you can go upstairs. I can’t wait that long and then I was crying so bad because like I wanted but crazy but I’m fine. I got it printed out now but it just got so crazy. I’ll tell you the rest later. Bye peace out bro peace out, bro. 2600:1700:21F9:CAE0:E554:CC5:9AAC:A0F7 04:32, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last night, I was emailed that someone had logged in to my account from a new device, an action I did not do. I have tried to change my password on the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ChangePassword multiple times. But when I click the blue “Change Credentials” button, it just brings me back to that same page, without any confirmation that my password was changed. As a result, I cannot change my password. Can you please fix this? I’m concerned that whoever logged in to my account last night can possibly lock me out. Thank you in advance for your help. Cdsal 99 (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cdsal 99. I am taking a huge stab in the dark here but I see you are on mobile, try clicking the "Desktop" link at the far, far bottom of the change password page and trying the process again. Commander Keane (talk) 01:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was thinking of making an election map depicting the results of a local election. I found the official ward boundaries of the council through the council’s official website but I have no idea on where to start. Is there special tools on Wikipedia/wikimedia that simplifies the process of making them? Any help on the topic would be appreciated Titanciwiki (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Titanciwiki: Is there an existing public-domain or free-licensed map of the relevant area already on Commons? If so, start from that. If not, it would sure help if you would say where you are talking about. No, there are no special tools, the graphics tools for making images here are the same as for any other site. - Jmabel ! talk 19:24, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright thanks! I was specifically referring to the Elpitiya Divisional Council (also known as the Elpitiya Pradeshiya Sabha) as an election was held there recently. The specific ward map found online was found here: https://elpitiyaps.lk/area-map/but I do not believe its in the public domain. What graphic tools are avalible to make an election map that can uploaded to wikimedia. Titanciwiki (talk) 20:15, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Titanciwiki, on Commons, I found Commons:Map resources and the Wikipedia page w:Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Resources/Tutorials has some tips, including a maps section. Commander Keane (talk) 20:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's of Judy Garland. Lobods123 (talk) 21:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Generally not: Getty Images retains full copyright on almost all of their images. See COMMONS:LICENSE. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i want to upload school logo and photos Davidchaple5 (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidchaple5: most school logos aren't eligible for Commons, because they are copyrighted either by the person who designed the logo or by the school, and the owner of the copyright won't issue a free license. However, some are old enough or simple enough to be in the public domain. If you can link a page showing the logo in question, someone can probably tell you whether the particular logo is eligible (though if it is a tricky case you are more likely to get an answer at Commons:Village pump/Copyright).

Photos: if you took them yourself, and they fall within Commons' scope, you can upload them just like any other photos. For beginners, I usually recommend Commons:UploadWizard. - Jmabel ! talk 14:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are concerned about copyright AND thre is an artcile about your school on Wikipedia, then upload it as a non-free image on WIkipedia and incorporate it into the article. I did this with my old school and a few years ago, I saw that the school had copied the image that I had posted for their own use! Martinvl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Martinvl and Davidchaple5: that would be good advice for the English-language Wikipedia, but each Wikipedia has its own policies with reference to non-free content. - Jmabel ! talk 19:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there is a photograph of a town in Iraq i would like to upload. The photo was published to an Iraqi Facebook page and it is the only instance of this photograph I could find on the internet. There is no information presented regarding who took the picture and when.

Are photos taken in Iraq & posted on Facebook okay to be uploaded & added to a Wikipedia page? I read this article -- en:Wikipedia:Using foreign images on Wikipedia -- but it wasn't very clear if images published in Iraq have copyright.

There are also other images published by organizations founded & headquartered in Iraq that I would like to use. Parzillum (talk) 21:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Parzillum. You'll find more details about this in Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Internet images, but generally every photo you find online that you didn't take yourself is not going to be OK to upload to Commons unless you can obtain the COM:CONSENT of its copyright holder. In general, the person who takes a photo is considered its copyright holder, and it's this person's consent that Commons needs. Many websites host photos taken by others and many people upload photos to websites that they didn't take themselves; so, it can often be tricky to figure out the en:provenance of a photo found online. While such things might be OK for other websites, it's not OK for Commons. So, if you unable to determine who actually took the photo, you could try asking whoever operates the website if they know, or you could try a en:reverse image search using something like en:TinEye to figure out its provenance. If you're still unable to find out more information about its provenance, you probably should look for a different photo whose copyright status might be easier to verify. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Parzillum, you can read about Iraq's copyright laws at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Iraq.

If you can't figure out the provenance as Marchjuly explains, another option could be to request for a Wikimedian to take a new, freely licensed photo. If it is an English Wikipedia article place the {{Photo requested}} on the article's talk page. Instead, on Commons we have Commons:File requests. Good luck. Commander Keane (talk) 01:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From reading the FAQ and help pages, my understanding is that an unembellished photo of an artwork (eg: a contemporary artist's sculpture) is considered a derivative work and cant be uploaded here. Yet I've seen a number of photos of art that have only a CC license from the photographer. Are those photos not supposed to be here? Can I not use them in Wikipedia? Thanks! Tsavage (talk) 05:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tsavage: Derivative works can be uploaded to Commons, but there at least two (and sometimes more) copyrights that need to be taken into account. Many countries do this for you by adding freedom of panorama provisions to their respective copyright laws in which the country states that publicly displayed works of art (2D or 3D) may be freely photographed without worrying about infringing on the copyright of the artist who created the work. Some countries, however, do place restrictions of such photographs and give precedence to the rights of the artist over the rights of the photographer. For this reason, many of the photos of statues or sculptures you find on Commons are of works either located in countries which allow such photographs to be freely taken or are of works that are no longer eligible or never were considered eligible for copyright protection for some reason. Ideally, a file such a this should have two licenses (one for the photo and one for the photographed work), but unfortunately the latter is often not provided because many people just seem to assume the photo is the only thing eligible for copyright protection.

Of course, you will, if you look hard enough, find photos of copyright works that shouldn't have been uploaded to Commons in the first place, and these files end up being discussed and sometimes deleted when they're found; however, finding them isn't always that easy and usually a bit of luck is involved. You often see this with Flickr images uploaded to Commons because most people and most bots automatically assume the Flickr license is all that matters when it comes to Commons regardless of whether it's correct. Anyway, if you come across one of these and know enough the add the missing license, feel free to do so. If not, you could always ask about it here.

Finally, using Commons photos on Wikipedia should, in principle, be OK because Commons is only supposed to host files that are licensed in accordance with COM:L and en:WP:COPY#Guidelines for images and other media files; however, you probably should avoid using anything that you strongly suspect of being incorrectly licensed (either by mistake or by intent) basically for the reasons given in en:WP:COPYLINK. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:52, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Practical confusion cleared up! For my own curiosity as to "how things work", say there's a photo of a publicly displayed statue, taken in a freedom of panorama country, uploaded by the photographer with a CC license but no artist license (citing the panorama provision), and used as-is in an en.Wikipedia article, and a copyright dispute somehow arises. Where is that likely to come from, and how would it be remedied? I'm looking for only a broad strokes idea of the real-world situation. Cheers. Tsavage (talk) 17:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tsavage: In many cases on en.wikipedia, a photo of a sculpture would be used in an article about the sculpture itself or about the sculptor and the photo would be used with substantial commentary about that sculpture or about the style of the sculptor. That would be a "fair use" of the sculpture and there would be no dispute if the sculpture is not misleadingly presented as freely usable (the file description would display a "non-free use" tag). In contrast, your question poses a case where en.wikipedia (or Commons) would use a photo of a copyrighted sculpture without any context that could justify its use. Then a copyright complaint can come from whoever owns or manages the copyright of that sculpture, for example the sculptor or an agency that manages the copyright for the sculptor. Several paths of action are available to them to demand remedy. One possibility is that the copyright holder sends a takedown notice to Wikimedia and then the remedy is that Wikimedia deletes the photo. You can have a look at this example. The discussion has probably more than you wanted to know about that topic and about the incongruities of Commons. (I did not remember that I wrote a comment about the DMCA in the subsection "Dutch FOP".) -- Asclepias (talk) 22:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tsavage: The freedom of panorama would have to be for statues (the US doesn't have that, only for buildings). In what country do you anticipate taking photos of statues?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G. and Tsavage: as far as I know, there is no case law about a sculpture that is still in copyright in the U.S., that is photographed in a country other than the U.S., is covered by Freedom of Panorama in that country, and is then published in the U.S. It is perfectly possible that a court could rule that such publication would violate U.S. copyright law.

We definitely do not have a firmly decided policy on whether such images are acceptable for Commons. We have more of a de facto approach:

1. We allow such images on Commons, despite the possibility that they might eventually be deemed to be violation of U.S. copyright law.
2. Any time we receive a DMCA notice for such an image (I'm only aware of one such case, though; multiple images, but one sculpture), we delete the image.

There are definitely a few users who object strongly to the former as skating on thin ice in terms of U.S. copyright law. My assumption is that if WMF Legal thought it was a serious risk, they'd have told us by now. Conversely, it is very likely that we would have at least a minor rebellion from de-wiki in particular if we were to change this approach: to them, FoP is pretty much a given. - Jmabel ! talk 17:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tsavage: The various language Wikipedias and Commons are separate projects with their own respective policies, guidelines and communities. Since Commons is mainly concerned about the copyright status of the content it hosts, the file you seem to be describing is most likely going to be OK to keep for the reasons given above by Jmabel. Whether that file ultimately ends up being used in some Wikipedia article, however, depends on that Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and how its community wants to apply them. For example. any file found on Commons should, in principle, be OK to add to an English Wikipedia article, but image use isn't automatic and often is determined by local consensus. Sometimes the local consensus is to not use an image regardless of what's happening here on Commons. A recent example of this, for reference, can be found here involving a local consensus established here. So, if you come across an image like the one describing and you think it shouldn't be used, you can be en:WP:BOLD or en:WP:CAUTIOUS. If you're bold and someone adds it back, you're probably going to need to sort things out through discussion on the article's talk page or at en:WP:FFD. Before you're bold, though, you might want to check the article's page history and the file's page history to see whether its use had been previously discussed. If a consensus has already been established that the image is OK to use, then it's probably better to be cautious and seek a new consensus to remove it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas, como elijo 2 o 3 imágenes (nominar) para el Deletion Request? AbchyZa22 (talk) 07:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No estoy seguro que entiendo. ¿Es la pregunta como empezar un DR para dos (o más) imágenes? ¿o como decidir cuales fotos merecen un tal nominación? Para el primero, vea Commons:Deletion requests/es/Solicitud de borrado masivo. También, VisualFileChange puede ayudar. El segundo es demasiado complejo para un resumen breve. - Jmabel ! talk 03:23, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel:La primera fue que pregunte como empiezo un DR para 2 o más imágenes, eso a me refiero. AbchyZa22 (talk) 07:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of front cover of a promotional leaflet for an exhibition in the 1930s. HandyRecorder (talk) 10:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HandyRecorder American? See Commons:Hirtle chart. Something else? Start at Commons:Copyright rules by territory. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A promotional leaflet would be singularly unlikely to have had its copyright renewed, so it's almost certainly OK, but if it had a copyright notice you will have to confirm the lack of renewal. - Jmabel ! talk 03:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I submitted the image of the leaflet and got the message below but I don’t understand what I need to do. Do I need to need to provide a valid copyright tag because it’s my photo of the leaflet, I.e do I need to add {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}}? I’m really struggling to understand the jargon and to know what to do to put it right! (P.S. Printed in UK)

Template:File license

HandyRecorder (talk) 06:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HandyRecorder: Hi, (n.b.: in your question, I replaced the full display of all the templates with a simple link to the message. It makes the question easier to read.) Considering that you took your own photo of a work that you did not create, the warning message may indeed be unclear on this point for a first-time user. In a case like this, the answer is no, you must not use a "self" licence, because it is considered that the simple photographic reproduction of a work does not generate a copyright. However, you must use a template that indicates the present copyright status of the original leaflet. In this case, an acceptable template could probably be PD-UK-unknown. You can add {{PD-UK-unknown}} in the licensing subsection of the description page of the file. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, this was an incredibly helpful reply. I think I have added the tag you suggested, though I confess that I don’t fully understand the process, so I may not have done it correctly. Fingers crossed? 🤞 HandyRecorder (talk) 14:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HandyRecorder: After taking a better look at the description, I note that the leaflet shows an illustration of an artwork (doll house) whose author died in 1933. An additional template could be added for that artwork, such as {{PD-old-auto|deathyear=1933}}. Also, although both the artwork and the leaflet are not copyrighted anymore in the UK, they might be still copyrighted in the United States (please see there), which places such files in a precarious situation on Commons. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Convenience link: File:Richold Exhibition Leaflet.jpg. Please, when discussing a particular file, link it! - Jmabel ! talk 17:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we know the publication date was no later than 1933, then even in the worst case it will be OK in the U.S. in 2029 (1933 + 95 + 1). We might have to delete it for a few years and restore it then. I'm honestly not that interested in working it out myself, but someone else can pursue it if they like. - Jmabel ! talk 18:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have the actual photo in a frame of the team in 1949 that I would like to upload, would this count as copyright or anything? KelsallFootballClub (talk) 16:06, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KelsallFootballClub: Most photos from 1949 are still copyrighted, but what country? Who was the photographer? Was the photo published and if so when? - Jmabel ! talk 03:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply, the photo was taken in the UK, in 1949 for an amateur football team, the photographer is unknown. All I have is the actual photograph in a frame. KelsallFootballClub (talk) 10:28, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The odds are enormous that the photographer was still alive in 1954, so it would presumably still be copyrighted in the UK. Also, assuming it was immediately published (distribution of numerous copies would count) it would be copyrighted in the U.S. through 2044. So I don't think we can allow it without tracking down the photographer's heirs and getting their permission. It is basically an orphaned work. - Jmabel ! talk 18:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KelsallFootballClub: On the other hand, if the photo was work for hire (that is, the photographer was working for the club), the club could release the photo via VRT.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 18:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there has been a proper search (offline) and the photographer cannot be traced, it would be public domain in the U.K, but restored by URAA so under U.S. copyright until January 1, 2045. Abzeronow (talk) 18:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AIK RAMZ THE POETOFPAIN IMG jpg.jpg DELET THIS PAGE PLEASE Anzarfayaz0 (talk) 17:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Anzarfayaz0: Hi. File:AIK RAMZ THE POETOFPAIN IMG jpg.jpg was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:AIK RAMZ THE POETOFPAIN IMG jpg.jpg. It used to redirect to File:Man sitting at table, his hand hides his face.jpg, which was deleted per COM:CSD#F10. Please see COM:DP and avoid using ALL CAPS, it appears like shouting.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 17:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is Younga Song from Jeju Dream Tower Marketing team.

on behalf of Jeju Dream Tower please remove the image below as this contains unofficial image and information.

File:제주드림타워.jpg

as we are seriously concerned if guests misunderstand from this image, please kindly ask to remove this image from website.

I will look forward to hearing from you.

Thank you. Younganda14 (talk) 05:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've nominated the file for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:제주드림타워.jpg; so, there's nothing really to discuss here. For reference, though, the reasons you're giving for requesting the file be deleted aren't really valid, but what does matter is that South Korea only allows for limited (i.e. non-commercial) freedom of panorama for buildings per COM:FOP South Korea and this seems too restrictive for Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to upload the cover of this book (published in 1992-93) on here but I'm very confused on the copyright laws regarding book covers in Singapore. Is it considered an artwork or a published edition? Is it within public domain? Imbluey2 (talk) 14:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Imbluey2: Per ISBN 981 204 394 2 and archive page 4, this appears to be the soft cover and is still copyrighted by author Chin, Woon Ping for Life + 70 years per COM:SINGAPORE.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G. how come articles such as Crazy Rich Asians can use an image of the subject's book cover? Does the cover have to be digitised? If so, then what about this [2]? Imbluey2 (talk) 00:53, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When I try to upload images to the wizard an error message appears but not showing where the error is Dimmic99 (talk) 20:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dimmic99, you seem to have successfully uploaded files after you posted this, has the problem gone away?

If the problem still persists can you describe which step the error occurs in exactly? Commander Keane (talk) 22:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, someone on the internet that goes by the reddit username zippee100 created 4 versions of the letter ⁊; Double ond(and, end, ind, ond, und, ynd), Triple ond(and, bnd, cnd, dnd, end, fnd, gnd, hnd, ind, jnd, knd, lnd, mnd, nnd, ond, pnd, qnd, rnd, snd, tnd, und, vnd, wnd, xnd, ynd, znd), Quintuple ond(and, ænd, oand, bnd, cnd, dnd, ðnd, end, ənd, fnd, ɟnd, gnd, ȝnd, ᵹnd, ꟑnd, hnd, ⱶnd, ɥnd, shnd, thnd, dhnd, θnd, ind, jnd, knd, lnd, mnd, nnd, ŋnd, ξnd, ond, œnd, pnd, ϻnd, qnd, rnd, snd, ʃnd, ⵋnd, tnd, þnd, ꟓnd, ϡnd, und, vnd, wnd, ꟃnd, φnd, xnd, ψnd, ωnd, ynd, znd, ʒnd, ⁊nd, &nd, ƿnd, ꟕnd) and Quindecuple ond(all unicode characters). Am I able to upload these new ⁊ variants? Visaa11 (talk) 00:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see where it would be in scope. Letters/typeforms don't have copyright in the US, so it would probably be out of copyright, but I'm not entirely sure what you're talking about.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:52, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are my uploaded files stored in an identifiable location? Can I store them in my sandbox"? Or? MarkWHowe (talk) 02:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MarkWHowe: I'm not sure exactly what you are asking, because I think you've got a false premise there somewhere.

1. The files are stored on WMF's servers. meta:Wikimedia_servers#Hosting gives a rundown of where those are located.
2. Each file has a file page, that can be referred to either by a URL and can be accessed by an "internal link" here on the wiki. For example, your uploaded picture of Isaac B. Howe at age 31 is at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Isaac_B._Howe_1858_at_age_31.jpg; a version intended for mobile devices is at https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Isaac_B._Howe_1858_at_age_31.jpg; but if you are referring to it on Commons, you would normally use an internal link: File:Isaac B. Howe 1858 at age 31.jpg (go into edit mode to see what that looks like) which will resolve appropriately for both a PC and a mobile device.
3. You can find all of your uploads at Special:ListFiles/MarkWHowe. You can get to that page by clicking the "uploads" link on any page while you are logged in. For most skins, that is near the upper right of your browser screen. You can also (while logged in) get to that page by navigating to the URL https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyUploads.
4. Sandbox pages are normally intended as throwaways, and are usually not a good place to link anything you would expect to keep track of in the long term.

I hope somewhere in there is the answer to your intended question. If not, the please be more specific. - Jmabel ! talk 02:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, #3 is precisely the answer to my question, altho' I haven't tested it yet. Thank you! MarkWHowe (talk) 15:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My dad was Charles Herbert Smith known as herb an all black in 1934 .My family are trying to put together some of his information and the photoagainsthsnameisothimAll thenfrmatonis my dad but that is not his photo. He was not Māori how can this be corrected please Thanks daughter Winsome June Marshall 115.189.98.127 08:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I can see a possible error. For the benefit of other helpers we are talking about File:Charles Herbert Smith.jpg whose source matches the photo but says "Rugby player, possibly Hawea Karepa Mataira". Pinging @Materialscientist, the uploader. Commander Keane (talk) 08:14, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source also says "Subject of photographer no longer considered to be Charles Herbert (Herb) Smith based on information provided by a family member. Original identification was based on the photographer's inscription on the negative. Title and description updated 17 April 2023." Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the photo from en-WP and wikidata. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out! Would you be able/interested in providing Commons with one or more correct images? There is some pain-ass bureaucracy to deal with, but we'll try to guide you. The first step is probably to register. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is "Charlie Smith" in that link him? If so, I think we can use it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:16, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Оглядова карта етніческіх земель українців 1915р Степана Рудницького Serhii Kaulko (talk) 15:16, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Using google translate, I don't see a question. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Оглядова карта етніческіх земель Українців 1915р. Serhii Kaulko (talk) 15:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BenjaminFranklinBridge.jpg

This is the image that I am referring to. This is my own photo that I uploaded.

I want to change what it says in the author section of the summary for this image. Currently it just says my account name and a link to my page. I was wondering if it would be possible to change what it says in this line so that I can add my actual name and then also have my wikipedia page link next to it. Please help, I am very confused after trying to figure out how to do this myself. I also do not really understand how any of this works so as simple and beginner-friendly of an explanation as possible please. Pynaps (talk) 19:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pynaps: on the file page, you can edit just like any other wiki text. - Jmabel ! talk 21:47, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do I do this? I have never edited anything on wikimedia or wikipedia before. Pynaps (talk) 22:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pynaps: You are editing right now as you engage in this conversation. - Jmabel ! talk 23:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you asking also how you would link to your English-language Wikipedia user page? Assuming it is the same user name, [[:en:User:Pynaps]]. - Jmabel ! talk 21:49, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel@Pynaps, I believe that the real name is wanted to be displayed on the file page rather than the user name "Pynaps". I guess you could click [edit] on the file page's Summary section and replace:

• "|author=[[User:Pynaps|Pynaps]]", with
• "|author= Jane Doe ([[User:Pynaps|Pynaps]])"

using the source editor.

I am not sure about the policy/best practice on this. But it sounds ok. If you want help you could ask here and someone will probably do it for you Pynaps. Just supply your real name (but consider privacy implications first). Commander Keane (talk) 23:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or "|author= ([[User:Pynaps|Jane Doe]])" which is the equivalent of what I do on mine.

Also, if you are concerned with how you are attributed, you can add author explicitly to the {{Self}} template (which I always do). E.g. mine is "{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0|author=[[User:Jmabel|Joe Mabel]]}}". - Jmabel ! talk 23:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello there! The Vice prez of India uploaded this image on the official Instagram account of VP. So is it considered public domain under GODL.? Can we upload such images to commons? ~redmyname31~💬 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Redmyname31 we are talking about Commons:Copyright rules by territory/India and {{GODL-India}}. I am not 100% sure in this case so I will defer to others. Do we know any more details about the image? Who took it etc. Commander Keane (talk) 23:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In general, this sort of question is better asked at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. - Jmabel ! talk 23:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Recently I have uploaded this file to Commons, but after I did it I noticed that there is a mistake in the image, where a text appears in the wrong place. However, the file on my device shows the correct placing of the text, and if I click the image in Commons, it shows how it's supposed to look like. Why is this error happening? Does it have to do with the original SVG file? How do I fix it? Thanks to whoever may respond. SamuelInzunza (talk) 03:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SamuelInzunza, does Help:Inkscape#Text_font_problems help? Commander Keane (talk) 04:39, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]