User talk:The Bushranger

If I leave a message for you: Please respond on your talk page. I'll probably add it to my watchlist, but if I miss something, feel free to leave a talkback. If you leave a message for me: I will most likely respond here. Either add this page to your watchlist or ask me to notify you of a response on your talk page. Note: I reserve the right to decline or withdraw from a situation that is escalating or uncomfortable, without giving a reason, or to take further action through permissable means. (See this policy.) If I mistakenly called your edits as vandalism when I reverted them, it was probably because you did not leave an edit summary. Please realize that, in many cases, unexplained edits are indistinguishable from vandalism! This also applies to Rollbacks. If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you will be reverted...and beware the giant dice.

This editor is a Grand High Togneme Vicarus and is entitled to write the Book of All Knowledge: 2nd Edition.

Archives

as Aerobird - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38

This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present.

Thanks for finally closing that. I just wanted to note that only two editors supported six months, and several editors suggested TBAN at minimum, with some going as far as to suggest a CIR CBAN, which to me implies that they think any TBAN should be indefinite. I also think the rationales for an indefinite TBAN were stronger. I think there was more consensus to overturn all of Turbo's closes than there was for a six month limit to the TBAN. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:34, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, looking it over again, you're right - so I'll strike that part. Thanks for catching that. That was a mess.- The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:00, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all of your discussion closures. I wish we had a few more admins helping out here so the responsibility doesn't always fall to you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

T'would be nice but we work with what we have. Happy to help out! - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:17, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• The Bushranger, there was a clear consensus that all RFCs should be overturned. Voorts has also reminded you of this above. Tbanning would prevent TurboSuperA+ from creating further disruption but what about the damage he already did? Re-initiating RFCs again is likely to elapse even more time. Let me know if one can overturn his closures. CharlesWain (talk) 04:11, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CharlesWain: Added a note to the closure to clarify that any editor in good standing can instead overturn them here. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:15, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you update Category:Cub Crafters aircraft to Category:CubCrafters aircraft? Assuming you agree with my unilateral move, of course! I'm terrible with categories, and moving categories isn't straightforward for me. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 18:50, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No prob - I'll put it at WP:CFDS for renaming. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:16, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! BilCat (talk) 21:39, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]