User:LordAlb/sandbox
Royal Navy during the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars
[edit]Royal Navy | |
---|---|
Active | 1793–1815 |
Country | ![]() |
Allegiance | ![]() |
Branch | Navy |
Role | Naval warfare |
Engagements | |
Commanders | |
First Lord of the Admiralty |
|
First Naval Lord |
|
Notable commanders |
The Royal Navy during the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars was instrumental to the success of the Coalition against the First French Empire. Until the Peninsular War, it was the primary weapon of the United Kingdom's war effort against Napoleon, with significant naval victories ensuring British naval and economic supremacy. The Royal Navy ferried allied armies to otherwise inaccessible theatres of war, notably the Armée des Émigrés during the Quiberon campaign and ferried Ottoman armies to where they were needed during the French invasion of Egypt and Syria. The British Army was also ferried to the West Indies for the Caribbean campaign. It also supplied allied armies during their campaigns and provided direct military support during sieges of coastal towns and cities (notably the Siege of Genoa and the Siege of Acre).
Britain's position as the financial backer of the Coalition meant that British naval supremacy was essential to the survival of the Allied war effort, and the British took extensive efforts to maintain it. When Spain allied with France in 1795, this presented a threat to British naval supremacy, and their combined fleets, if amassed near the English Channel, could present a legitimate invasion threat. British naval victories at Cape St. Vincent, Cape Finisterre and Trafalgar neutralised this threat. The creation of the Second League of Armed Neutrality provoked concerns from the British who believed (perhaps rightfully) that French domination of the European mainland would cause the comparatively large navy of Denmark–Norway to fall into French hands, presenting a new naval threat. At the First and Second Battles of Copenhagen, the British seized or destroyed the entire Danish fleet, although Denmark was a neutral country and so these attacks were controversial, both at home and abroad. Even King George III disapproved of the actions taken by own navy. The government and it's supporters in Parliament, including William Wilberforce, defended the actions against Denmark as necessary for British defence. Denmark–Norway allied with France in response to these attacks, but the main threat of the Danish Navy had been neutralised, with the Danish war effort against Britain being carried out via gunboats rather than the more powerful ships of the line which constituted the main threat to Britain. the Treaty of Tilsit, in which the Russian Empire allied with France, also posed a new, but not as serious, naval threat to Britain. The resulting Anglo-Russian War was of a much smaller scale than Britain's wars against Denmark, Spain and France and was mostly limited to minor naval actions and diplomatic incidents. Admiral James Saumarez carried out a campaign in the Baltic in which individual ships of the British Baltic Fleet captured Russian ships to disrupt their war effort against Sweden during the Finnish War. Russia's commitment to the alliance with Napoleon proved lukewarm, and no major battles were directly fought between Britain and Russia during the conflict, although it was planned that the British would ferry a field army under Sir John Moore to fight alongside the Swedes, but disagreements between the British and Swedish governments led to Moore being ordered home.
Tenets and Tropes of the Lost Cause Myth
[edit]The myth of the Lost Cause of the Confederacy is varied and offers a range of pro-Confederate historical perspectives on the American Civil War. Not all of these notions are consistent with each other and adherents to the Lost Cause may believe some and not believe others, depending on preference or biases related to other historical events. The main idea of the Lost Cause is that the Confederacy did not fight to preserve the institution of slavery, but fought for "states rights".
Some of the other outstanding beliefs and ideas of the myth are:
- That the cause of the Confederate States of America was noble, righteous, and comparable to that of the Patriots of the American Revolutionary War.
- That the Confederacy was a sovereign nation fighting for its independence.
- That the planter class of the Antebellum South was a noble caste of society that adhered to a strict code of honour based on chivalry and paternalism. Adherents of this trope claim that the "Southern gentlemen" had inherited this tradition from the nobility of Europe, particularly the Cavaliers of the English Civil War.
- That American slavery was a comparatively benign and benevolent institution.
- That Abraham Lincoln was a tyrant who violated the Constitution of the United States and the civil liberties of Americans on numerous occasions, and that he was not as strongly anti-slavery as often depicted.
- That Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation did not free any slaves in practice, and was purely a political move to placate abolitionists and dissuade Britain or France from intervening in the war.
- That tens of thousands of free black men enlisted in the Confederate army as soldiers and saw frequent action.
- That the Confederate military leadership, especially Generals Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson, were near-flawless military geniuses comparable to Napoleon Bonaparte.
- That Confederate General James Longstreet was a traitor to the South and bore sole responsibility for the Confederate defeat at the Battle of Gettysburg.
- That the Union Army (especially the part of the army under the command of William Tecumseh Sherman) was guilty of numerous war crimes, including mass rape, looting, murder and the illegal confiscation of Southern property.
- That the Confederate defeat in the war was due to the superior industrial and population capacity of the North, not due to the failures of the Confederate leadership or the competence of the North.
- That Ulysses S. Grant was not a great general, and that he only defeated Lee due to "overwhelming numbers and resources". Grant's high casualty figures in the Overland Campaign, as well as his alcoholism, are often cited as evidence of this.
- That the recruitment of Native Americans such as Stand Watie to the Confederate cause was based entirely on altruism, and that a Confederate victory may have ended the American Indian Wars and led to the creation of an independent state in the Indian Territory.
Generalship of Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington
[edit]History
[edit]Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington was the most prominent British general of the Napoleonic Wars and is considered one of the greatest strategic battlefield commanders in history. Born to a Protestant Irish aristocratic family in Dublin, he began his military career as a junior officer in the Flanders campaign of the War of the First Coalition, seeing action at the Battle of Boxtel. In 1799, he began fighting for the East India Company and played a prominent role in expanding the Company's territory and influence in India, where his brother, the Earl of Mornington, was governor-general. He fought in the Siege of Seringapatam as a colonel, for which he was promoted to lieutenant-general, and then in 1803 led a British and Indian army to an impressive victory over a much larger Maratha force at the Battle of Assaye. It is believed that Wellesley and his brother Later in life, he reflected that Assaye had been his greatest victory, although many in the army viewed him as a product of nepotism.
Upon returning to Great Britain, he saw little action, as the British army remained a small volunteer army which was not required to raise as many men as its continental counterparts. In 1807, he participated as a divisional commander in the Copenhagen expedition and successfully defeated a Danish militia force at the Battle of Køge.
Wellesley returned to command in 1808, being deployed to Portugal to attack the French army under general Jean-Andoche Junot which had invaded and occupied the country. Wellesley made a successful landing at the Battle of Roliça and then defeated Junot's main aemy at the Battle of Vimeiro. Wellesley was soon replaced by Sir Hew Dalrymple, who then offered to repatriated Junot and his army to France in British ships, terms that were deemed overly generous in Britain, and Dalrymple and Wellesley were removed, being replaced by Sir John Moore. In 1809, Wellesley returned to Portugal and commanded an Anglo-Portuguese Army which quickly liberated the country. He remained in the Iberian Peninsula for another five years, leading several campaigns which helped to decisively push Napoleon's army out of Spain, at which point he invaded Southern France in 1814, the first Allied general to do so since 1796. During the campaign in Spain and Portugal, he had defeated some of France's most notable generals including Claude-Victor Perrin, Jean-Baptiste Jourdan, Auguste de Marmont and André Masséna, and had also defeated Napoleon's brother, Joseph Bonaparte, who the former had made King of Spain in 1808. Masséna and Jourdan in particular, would never hold command again after their defeats. He was promoted to Field marshal after a decisive vixtory at the Battle of Vitoria in 1813. For his victories, Wellesley was granted several peerages, first as Viscount Wellington in 1809, Then Earl of Wellington in February 1812, Marquess of Wellington in August 1812, then finally Duke of Wellington and Marquess Douro in 1814. He also received the Spanish title of Duke of Ciudad Rodrigo in January 1812 and the Portuguese title of Duke of Victoria in December 1812.
In 1815, Napoleon, having abdicated and been exiled the previous year, returned to France and firmly took back control of the country. Hoping to win an quick victory and negotiate peace from a position of strength, Napoleon attacked the two nearest Allied armies, those of Wellington and his Prussian counterpart, Field marshal Gebhard Leberecht von Blücher, stationed in the Netherlands. After a momentary setback at the Battle of Quatre Bras, Wellington and Napoleon met their armies at the Battle of Waterloo. After holding his line against Napoleon's attacks for several hours, the battle ended in an Allied victory when Blücher's Prussians arrived on Napoleon's right flank and Wellington's army repelled a final desperate attack by Napoleon's hitherto undefeated Imperial Guard. Disturbed by the casualty figures from the battle, Wellington subsequently retired from the army and pursued a political career, briefly becoming Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and serving as Commander-in-Chief of the Forces until his death in 1852.
Description of ability
[edit]Wellington is best remembered as a defensive general. Although some of his greatest victories were in offensive battles, he was undoubtedly a master of defensive tactics and strategy. A signature tactic of his was reverse slope defence, in which he would position much of his army behind a gentle slope or ridge to cover them from artillery and conceal his numbers and his movements, exploiting the overconfidence of his enemies. He used this to great effect in the Battle of Salamanca, in which Marshal Marmont, not seeing the size of Wellington's army, assumed he was attempting to retreat, leading to him making a fatal blunder which Wellington then exploited. He also used this tactic at the Battle of Waterloo, keeping his infantry squares out of range of Napoleon's artillery, while countering a poorly executed cavalry charge led by Michel Ney. During the Second Portuguese Campaign, Wellington conducted a defensive scorched earth strategy which starved the army of Marshal André Masséna as it pushed through the country, while Wellington pulled back to an exceptionally strong defensive position at the Lines of Torres Vedras, triggering a standoff which spelled the failure of Masséna's campaign and forced him into a costly retreat. This strategy of applying scorched earth tactics to one's own territory to keep the enemy from living off the land was later replicated on a much larger scale by the Russians during the French invasion of Russia the next year.
Wellington was the first of the Coalition generals to successfully command a large, multinational army. His army in the Peninsular War was made up of British, Portuguese, Spanish, German and even some Dutch troops. Commanding an army from this many countries posed a challenge, as not all countries involved in the coalition had the same interests. The Spanish in particular were difficult to work with, as they were highly sceptical of British motives. There were some generals, such as Joaquín Blake and Juan O'Donojú, who had Irish ancestry, and were naturally untrusting of the British. Wellington did receive considerable support from Spanish Guerrillas, who harassed the French in the countryside and provided vital intelligence to Wellington's armies. This also lessened Wellington's need to rely on cavalry for reconnaissance. Wellington would again command a large multinational army in the Waterloo campaign, many of whom were inexperienced and many had also fought on Napoleon's side during the previous wars. In order to ensure that his diverse armies would cooperate, Wellington imposed strict standards of discipline, punishing looters with flogging, although he did not always carry these punishments out if the army was experiencing particular difficulty. Even so, it was difficult for Wellington to maintain this standard, as looting among the rank and file proved a persistent problem in his campaigns. Wellington's harsh discipline policy meant that he was respected, rather than loved, by his men.
Wellington held a five-star rank in the armies of eight European countries:
Portugal (Marshal-general) Awarded 6 July 1809
Spain (Captain-general) Awarded 8 August 1809
United Kingdom (Field marshal) Awarded 21 June 1813
Hanover (Field marshal) Awarded 21 June 1813
Netherlands (Field marshal) Awarded 7 May 1815
Prussia (Field marshal) Awarded 15 November 1818
Austria (Field marshal) Awarded 15 November 1818
Russia (Field marshal) Awarded 15 November 1818
The last three of these were never used in an official capacity, as Wellington had just removed his armies from occupied France.
Fifth Coalition (Peninsular War)
[edit]data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d06ff/d06ffecd69cbc1f1f5212b32f3ee73985561ce31" alt=""
A large part of the reason for Austrian mobilisation against France was the outbreak of the Peninsular War in Spain and Portugal the previous year, in which the French had suffered defeats at Bailén, Vimeiro and Zaragoza. The Austrians believed the war in Iberia would weaken the French Imperial Army, keeping French troops tied down and unable to defend against an Austrian offensive, while stories of Spanish resistance to French occupation had galvanized the anti-French spirit in the rest of Europe. Although Napoleon had intervened personally in Spain towards the end of 1808 and inflicted devastating defeats on the Spanish at Tudela and Somosierra, he had failed to end the conflict decisively before returning to France. Although the events of the Peninsular War are not directly related to the War of the Fifth Coalition, important moments did overlap with it.
By May of 1809, an Anglo-Portuguese Army under Sir Arthur Wellesley had amassed in Portugal, and quickly liberated the country after defeating Marshal Soult at the Second Battle of Porto. Wellesley then focused his attention on Spain, coordinating with a Spanish army under general Gregorio García de la Cuesta and defeating an army led by Marshal Victor and King Joseph at the Battle of Talavera, for which Wellesley received a peerage and became Viscount Wellington. Despite the victory, Wellington's relations with his Spanish counterparts remained difficult, and he was eventually forced to retreat back to Portugal when he came under threat of being encircled by Marshal Soult. The French defeat at Talavera was followed by a victory over Francisco Javier Venegas' army at the Battle of Almonacid. Elsewhere in Spain, Girona was under siege, and would eventually be taken in December. The Spanish attempted to follow up on the victory at Talavera with a two-pronged march on Madrid, but received no support from Wellington, due to previous lack of cooperation from the Spanish during the Talavera campaign. The southernmost of the Spanish forces, led by Juan Carlos Aréizaga, was decisively defeated by Soult at the Battle of Ocaña in November, after the war in Austria had ended.
Army of the North (1813–1814)
[edit]The Army of the North was a major field army of the Sixth Coalition against Napoleon. It was commanded by Charles John, the French-born Crown Prince of Sweden and former Marshal of the French Empire. Under Charles John's command, alongside the regular Swedish Army, was the Prussian III Corps commanded by General Friedrich Wilhelm Freiherr von Bülow, a Russian corps under the command of General Ferdinand von Wintzingerode and the 200 strong British Rocket Brigade, commanded by Captain Richard Bogue. It fielded about 100,000 men, and its actions were centred in the north of Germany.
It was one of four major field armies that was part of the German campaign of 1813. Charles John was a notable advocate of the Trachenberg Plan, in which the allies agreed not to attack Napoleon directly and focused instead on his Marshals and other corps commanders. Under Charles John's leadership, the Army of the North defeated the French corps under Marshals Michel Ney and Nicolas Oudinot at the Battle of Dennewitz and the Battle of Großbeeren respectively. It also took part in the Battle of Leipzig, arriving on the second day of the battle, although Charles John was heavily criticized for not arriving sooner. It has been speculated that he was apprehensive about fighting Napoleon, his own former commander, in direct combat, and so deliberately delayed his arrival at Leipzig. One of the most notable moments of the battle involved the Army of the North, when Saxon troops (whom Charles John had previously commanded during his service with Napoleon) defected to the Allies in the middle of the battle.
After the German campaign, Charles John largely broke from the rest of the Allied armies and took no part in the Campaign in north-east France. Instead, the Army of the North focused its efforts on the Dano-Swedish War, attacking Denmark and negotiating the surrender of Norway to the Swedish Crown.
Corps of the Grande Armée
[edit]Coalition Wars Infoboxes
[edit]War of the Second Coalition | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the French Revolutionary Wars | |||||||
Left to right, top to bottom: Battle of the Pyramids, Battle of the Nile, Battle of Marengo, Battle of Hohenlinden | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
|
| ||||||
|
War of the Third Coalition | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Napoleonic Wars | |||||||||
Left to Right, Top to Bottom: Battle of Ulm, Battle of Trafalgar, Battle of Austerlitz | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Belligerents | |||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() | ||||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||||
|
War of the Fourth Coalition | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Napoleonic Wars | |||||
| |||||
Belligerents | |||||
|
![]() | ||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||
Peninsular War | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Napoleonic Wars | |||||||
Left to Right, Top to Bottom: Dos de Mayo Uprising, Battle of Bailén, Battle of Somosierra, Battle of Corunna, Battle of Salamanca, Battle of Vitoria | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
|
| ||||||
|
War of the Fifth Coalition | |||
---|---|---|---|
Part of the Napoleonic Wars | |||
Left to right, top to bottom: Battle of Eckmühl, Battle of Ratisbon, Battle of Aspern-Essling, Battle of Wagram | |||
| |||
Belligerents | |||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() | ||
Commanders and leaders | |||
|
French Invasion of Russia | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Belligerents | |||||
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() | ||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||
|
War of the Sixth Coalition | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Napoleonic Wars | |||||||||
Left to Right, Top to Bottom: Battle of Dresden, Battle of the Katzbach, Battle of Leipzig, Battle of Laon, Battle of Arcis-sur-Aube, Battle of Paris | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Belligerents | |||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() | ||||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
War of the Seventh Coalition | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Napoleonic Wars | |||||||
Left to Right, Top to Bottom: Battle of Quatre Bras, Battle of Ligny, Battle of Waterloo | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
| |||||||
|
World War I Infobox
[edit]World War I | |||
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Belligerents | |||
Allied Powers![]() ![]() |
Central Powers![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||
Commanders and leaders | |||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||
|
World War II Infobox
[edit]World War II | |||
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Belligerents | |||
Allied Powers The "Big Four" ![]() ![]() Allies before 1940 Allies after 1940 Allies after 1941 |
Axis Powers Main Axis Powers
![]() Other Axis Powers | ||
Commanders and leaders | |||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cold War | |||
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Belligerents | |||
![]() Other Western Bloc countries |
![]() Other Eastern Bloc countries | ||
Commanders and leaders | |||
|
Second Cold War Infobox
[edit]Second Cold War | |||
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Belligerents | |||
![]() |
![]() | ||
Commanders and leaders | |||
|