User talk:Griffinofwales

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 22:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content deletion

It doesn't make sense to keep adding content about something you have no knowledge of. You are re-uploading what the person who deleted the sources I added wrote. You need to be a little more reasonable. Xiongnu.Turkic (talk) 22:35, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First, there is the reversion policy you should be aware of. This policy indicates that a user should not continue to revert another user's changes, without discussion. You are currently in violation of that policy.

Secondly, the blanking of an article is considered vandalism, even if you disagree with the changes. The proper process for changing an article, in which the information is disputed, is through discussion on the article's talk page. In the case of the article you have most recently changed, it is currently in a RFD, and that may be the best location to have that discussion.

However, the blanking of an article, constant reverting of edits to an article, or lack of discussion about changes to an article is not considered appropriate behaviour among the editing community and will resort in blocks as necessary. Griff (talk) 22:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted it because such a battle did not take place and because it completely changed the content I added. A battle that did not take place and is not true cannot be shown as real. The page needs to be deleted directly. Xiongnu.Turkic (talk) 22:46, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are two processes for this. One is the RFD process which the article is going through right now. The second is the quick deletion process which is an option for hoaxes. Neither of these two options include blanking pages, which is considered vandalism. As is, if you have comments on the RFD or the article, please comment there. I repeat, page blanking is not an option for deleting articles. Griff (talk) 00:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NVS

Hey Griffy, yeah NVS was cool. There's tonnes of people I miss, (sigh) fr33k man 01:16, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]