Moebeus
Issues identifying single release
edithttps://www.discogs.com/master/185405-LTD-Every-Time-I-Turn-Around-Back-In-Love-Again-
Somehow there are four different 45 RPM 7" vinyl released in the US with the specific catalog code of "1974-S" all released in the same year by the same recording company A&M Records
How am i supposed to know which release should be added to (Everytime I Turn Around) Back in Love Again / Material Things (Q131520654)? Trade (talk) 23:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC) (Not gonna lie, i have no clue how you manage to keep track of so many releases with identical titles)
- Since we're (generally speaking) not allowed to use cover art in most cases, I simply don't think it's any point in trying to maintain release variants / pressings with only visual or other extremely tiny differences. If all that is different is the cover art, pressing plant, etc. and the tracklist is otherwise identitical, then I treat them as the same release.
- Discogs is heavily skewed towards collectors, sometimes with huge sums of money separating one variant from another, so their focus is a little different.
- What I do in these situations is to add all the Discogs release IDs that for all practical purposes are the same. A Wikidata single release can also have multiple MusicBrains release IDS if it's only a visual difference in the MB db.
- 45cat is an example of a database of vinyl singles that uses "our" style of modelling. Moebeus (talk) 14:47, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I should also mention that I normally try to not mix promo copies from Discogs in with the regular releases. Unless a single only came out as a promo, I don't spend time time on it, our backlog of regular releases is long enough. Moebeus (talk) 14:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Which backlog are you referring to? Trade (talk) 08:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- So in short, if a release variant does not exist outside of Discog then it's probably not worth adding Trade (talk) 04:41, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- For something else, am i correct in assuming this album is instrumental? I find it difficult to tell if the background noise is from a vocalist or just the instruments Trade (talk) 04:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- You don't have to assume, there is a source for it: Alatyr - Zemou zabudnutia - Encyclopaedia Metallum:
This album is without vocals due to the dissatisfaction of the original vocal mix
Moebeus (talk) 16:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- I should also mention that I normally try to not mix promo copies from Discogs in with the regular releases. Unless a single only came out as a promo, I don't spend time time on it, our backlog of regular releases is long enough. Moebeus (talk) 14:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Any suggestion on what to do with Vocaloid music? I cant figure out who to place as the performer of The Fox's Wedding (Remake) (Q131106186) (MASA WORKS DESIGN (Q131105797) (they are the Vocaloid-P (Q85873795)), Hatsune Miku (Q112748598) (VOCALOID software), Hatsune Miku (Q552682) (VOCALOID character) or Saki Fujita (Q1066065) (voice actor for Miku)--Trade (talk) 04:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm no expert on vocaloid, I would suggest mimicing what MusicBrainz does, more people over there invested in the genre who have already done much of the heavy lifting in terms of modelling? Moebeus (talk) 12:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Doesnt seem like they have done anything for Vocaloids specifically. Looking at Masa Works' Musicbrainz profile specifically it's essentially just a 1-1 copy of his Spotify page with little in the way of modeling. likely just scraped from the site itself Trade (talk) 23:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Any protests over this change? Feels like a more appropriate qualifier to use in this case--Trade (talk) 23:13, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Is it appropriate of me to use director and manufacturer on Green, Green / The Banjo (Q11300529)? I presume so given the constraint errors--Trade (talk) 03:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- I wish you wouldn't use "role named in credits as", it doesn't make sense on this class of entity. And even if it did, does role named in credits as = "by" add any value? I don't think that it does.
- director does not belong on singles or albums, and is indeed inappropriate as indicated by the constraint warning. I'm assuming the property you are looking for is either musical conductor or choral conductor? Moebeus (talk) 13:31, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- When you say "this class of entity" are you referring to singles specifically? Trade (talk) 09:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- singles, albums, EPs. These are groupings of releases, and there isn't anything printed on them that can be verified. If you're going to use it, it should be on a single release, album release, EP release etc.
- This is why I was hesitant to vote for the property proposal. Moebeus (talk) 14:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I will take a look at the issue the coming week since it bothers you. In the meantime would you mind giving your input to the latest Music identifier proposals? Trade (talk) 18:18, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- When you say "this class of entity" are you referring to singles specifically? Trade (talk) 09:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Tech News: 2025-03
editLatest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Weekly highlight
- The Single User Login system is being updated over the next few months. This is the system which allows users to fill out the login form on one Wikimedia site and get logged in on all others at the same time. It needs to be updated because of the ways that browsers are increasingly restricting cross-domain cookies. To accommodate these restrictions, login and account creation pages will move to a central domain, but it will still appear to the user as if they are on the originating wiki. The updated code will be enabled this week for users on test wikis. This change is planned to roll out to all users during February and March. See the SUL3 project page for more details and a timeline.
Updates for editors
- On wikis with PageAssessments installed, you can now filter search results to pages in a given WikiProject by using the
inproject:
keyword. (These wikis: Arabic Wikipedia, English Wikipedia, English Wikivoyage, French Wikipedia, Hungarian Wikipedia, Nepali Wikipedia, Turkish Wikipedia, Chinese Wikipedia) [1] - One new wiki has been created: a Wikipedia in Tigre (
w:tig:
) [2] - View all 35 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, there was a bug with updating a user's edit-count after making a rollback edit, which is now fixed. [3]
Updates for technical contributors
- Wikimedia REST API users, such as bot operators and tool maintainers, may be affected by ongoing upgrades. Starting the week of January 13, we will begin rerouting some page content endpoints from RESTbase to the newer MediaWiki REST API endpoints for all wiki projects. This change was previously available on testwiki and should not affect existing functionality, but active users of the impacted endpoints may raise issues directly to the MediaWiki Interfaces Team in Phabricator if they arise.
- Toolforge tool maintainers can now share their feedback on Toolforge UI, an initiative to provide a web platform that allows creating and managing Toolforge tools through a graphic interface, in addition to existing command-line workflows. This project aims to streamline active maintainers’ tasks, as well as make registration and deployment processes more accessible for new tool creators. The initiative is still at a very early stage, and the Cloud Services team is in the process of collecting feedback from the Toolforge community to help shape the solution to their needs. Read more and share your thoughts about Toolforge UI.
- For tool and library developers who use the OAuth system: The identity endpoint used for OAuth 1 and OAuth 2 returned a JSON object with an integer in its
sub
field, which was incorrect (the field must always be a string). This has been fixed; the fix will be deployed to Wikimedia wikis on the week of January 13. [4] - Many wikis currently use Cite CSS to render custom footnote markers in Parsoid output. Starting January 20 these rules will be disabled, but the developers ask you to not clean up your MediaWiki:Common.css until February 20 to avoid issues during the migration. Your wikis might experience some small changes to footnote markers in Visual Editor and when using experimental Parsoid read mode, but if there are changes these are expected to bring the rendering in line with the legacy parser output. [5]
Meetings and events
- The next meeting in the series of Wikimedia Foundation Community Conversations with the Wikimedia Commons community will take place on January 15 at 8:00 UTC and at 16:00 UTC. The topic of this call is defining the priorities in tool investment for Commons. Contributors from all wikis, especially users who are maintaining tools for Commons, are welcome to attend.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Tech News: 2025-04
editLatest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Updates for editors
- Administrators can mass-delete multiple pages created by a user or IP address using Extension:Nuke. It previously only allowed deletion of pages created in the last 30 days. It can now delete pages from the last 90 days, provided it is targeting a specific user or IP address. [6]
- On wikis that use the Patrolled edits feature, when the rollback feature is used to revert an unpatrolled page revision, that revision will now be marked as "manually patrolled" instead of "autopatrolled", which is more accurate. Some editors that use filters on Recent Changes may need to update their filter settings. [7]
- View all 31 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, the Visual Editor's "Insert link" feature did not always suggest existing pages properly when an editor started typing, which has now been fixed.
Updates for technical contributors
- The Structured Discussion extension (also known as Flow) is being progressively removed from the wikis. This extension is unmaintained and causes issues. It will be replaced by DiscussionTools, which is used on any regular talk page. The last group of wikis (Catalan Wikiquote, Wikimedia Finland, Goan Konkani Wikipedia, Kabyle Wikipedia, Portuguese Wikibooks, Wikimedia Sweden) will soon be contacted. If you have questions about this process, please ping Trizek (WMF) at your wiki. [8]
- The latest quarterly Technical Community Newsletter is now available. This edition includes: updates about services from the Data Platform Engineering teams, information about Codex from the Design System team, and more.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Axel F (Axel F (Q113532005))
editI must say i am bit confused about this being marked as an instrumental track. May i ask what your reasoning was? Trade (talk) 22:01, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- The original is an instrumental and my ears started bleeding after listening to "ring ding ding bem bem ring ring ding ding bem aaaam da rem bam da da" for twenty seconds? That would be my guess :)
- If any actual lyrics are sung then just channge it to a vocal track, I am happy for any mistakes I've made to be corrected. Moebeus (talk) 22:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Do you agree that all of these statements should be moved to distribution format (P437)? --Trade (talk) 00:28, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- That query is timing out for me. What are you looking to do and how is it related to Axel F? It's easier for me to follow a discussion if you start a new thread when you change the subject. Moebeus (talk) 16:29, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Got it. Here's the statements Trade (talk) 23:38, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. Yes, these certainly need to be moved, but there's too many of them for me to confidently say the should all be moved to distribution format, looks like at least some belong in "has quality"? I'll spend a little more time spot testing just to make sure if that's okay with you. Moebeus (talk) 12:08, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Got it. Here's the statements Trade (talk) 23:38, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- That query is timing out for me. What are you looking to do and how is it related to Axel F? It's easier for me to follow a discussion if you start a new thread when you change the subject. Moebeus (talk) 16:29, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Do you agree that all of these statements should be moved to distribution format (P437)? --Trade (talk) 00:28, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Merging music videos
editDo these music videos deserve seperate items in your opinion? Could not decide myself on it --Trade (talk) 23:41, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Generally speaking, if the audio track is different (like, if sung in different languages), then yes, they need to be separate items. Music videos are part of the music model, each are assigned a unique ISRC identifier, and as such are in a weird spot between an audio track and a short film.
- If someone wanted to expand on the model they could possibly massage it so that three music video items all share the same visual (a hypothetical 4th item then, handled by Project Film?) but I'll leave that for others to decide, I try to stay focused on the music. Moebeus (talk) 12:22, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Tech News: 2025-05
editLatest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Weekly highlight
- Patrollers and admins - what information or context about edits or users could help you to make patroller or admin decisions more quickly or easily? The Wikimedia Foundation wants to hear from you to help guide its upcoming annual plan. Please consider sharing your thoughts on this and 13 other questions to shape the technical direction for next year.
Updates for editors
- iOS Wikipedia App users worldwide can now access a personalized Year in Review feature, which provides insights based on their reading and editing history on Wikipedia. This project is part of a broader effort to help welcome new readers as they discover and interact with encyclopedic content.
- Edit patrollers now have a new feature available that can highlight potentially problematic new pages. When a page is created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted, a tag ('Recreated') will now be added, which users can filter for in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. [9]
- Later this week, there will be a new warning for editors if they attempt to create a redirect that links to another redirect (a double redirect). The feature will recommend that they link directly to the second redirect's target page. Thanks to the user SomeRandomDeveloper for this improvement. [10]
- Wikimedia wikis allow WebAuthn-based second factor checks (such as hardware tokens) during login, but the feature is fragile and has very few users. The MediaWiki Platform team is temporarily disabling adding new WebAuthn keys, to avoid interfering with the rollout of SUL3 (single user login version 3). Existing keys are unaffected. [11]
- View all 30 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week.
Updates for technical contributors
- For developers that use the MediaWiki History dumps: The Data Platform Engineering team has added a couple of new fields to these dumps, to support the Temporary Accounts initiative. If you maintain software that reads those dumps, please review your code and the updated documentation, since the order of the fields in the row will change. There will also be one field rename: in the
mediawiki_user_history
dump, theanonymous
field will be renamed tois_anonymous
. The changes will take effect with the next release of the dumps in February. [12]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.