Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Backlash to diversity and inclusion

Wikipedia Arbitration
About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)
Track related changes
v t e

Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.

To update this listing, edit this template and scroll down until you find the right list of arbitrators. If updates to this listing do not immediately show, try purging the cache.

Active:

1. Aoidh (talk · contribs)
2. Cabayi (talk · contribs)
3. CaptainEek (talk · contribs)
4. Guerillero (talk · contribs)
5. HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs)
6. Moneytrees (talk · contribs)
7. Primefac (talk · contribs)
8. Sdrqaz (talk · contribs)
9. ToBeFree (talk · contribs)
10. Z1720 (talk · contribs)

Inactive:

1. Firefly (talk · contribs)
2. L235 (talk · contribs)

I think it was a good decision to acknowledge this as part of a bigger issue. Valereee (talk) 13:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can new parties be added to the case at this stage? What's happening on Talk:Assassin's Creed Shadows is worrying, and I'm wondering if it's helpful to submit evidence about it, given that there are only two parties (User:Symphony Regalia and myself) involved in these discussions. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 00:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gitz6666: New parties can be added, but there should be a very compelling reason to do so. If you feel that the evidence is relevant to the case I would suggest submitting it. - Aoidh (talk) 17:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]