Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 13

< April 12	April 14 >

April 13

File:Cacodemon (Doom).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This file states that it is to be used as the primary means of identifying the subject at the beginning of the corresponding article. This is not the case. The article currently has another file as its primary identifying image, and though that image is not as dramatic as this one, it is in the public domain (which this one is not). I think this means we can't retain this one on Wikipedia. If I am wrong, someone please correct me. A loose necktie (talk) 01:43, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A loose necktie, you're right. This image is not at the beginning of the article; a free alternative is available, and the article already uses that one. We don't have fair use justification for this one from Doom. Stay well, Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 18:29, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - FAils WP:NFCC#1 as the article already has a free image for identification, and fails WP:NFCC#8 as it is not being used for identification as claimed and its addition does not significantly increase a reader's understanding of this topic. -- Whpq (talk) 19:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zombie Dog (Resident Evil).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. With a relicencing, however. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image is NOT cover art for a video game, it is art WITHIN that game, and for this reason I do not believe the non-free rationale holds. A loose necktie (talk) 01:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, changed the licensing to "non-free character" and updated the fair use. Should be fine to keep now. Salavat (talk) 13:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - NFUR has been revised and its use for visual identification meets WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:15, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn A loose necktie (talk) 17:15, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:T4F company-logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn/Moot, didn't realize Salavat only removed the nrd tag after filling the FUR. -FASTILY 06:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for dated deletion by @JJMC89 under WP:CSD#F4 as missing source information. FASTILY 04:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This should have just been declined. The editor that provided a source just didn't remove the template. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JMA7 Anglin shore leave with buddy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion. Old personal photo/s. assuming that they own the "vintage photos," these cannot be passed at Wikimedia Commons because "out of scope." Also orphaned and unusable in any Wikimedia sites or in any outside medium. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also the following:

Delete all, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 13:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joe Santagato.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficient evidence of permission. The provided permission is a screenshot. The provide screenshot makes no mention of a license. Furthermore, Joe Santagato is the subject of the video which does not necessarily mean he is the copyright holder. This really needs to be done via WP:OTRS. Whpq (talk) 14:53, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I do not doubt that Mr. Santago agreed to let someone use a photo of him for his Wikipedia article, but I HIGHLY doubt he is the author of that image. The uploader needs to find out WHO TOOK the picture, and then have THAT person (NOT Mr. Santago) send a permission statement into the OTRS system (as mentioned above). THAT person has to be willing to let anyone at all reuse the image for any purpose, including possible commercial reuse without compensation. Often they just won't do that. But hey! Maybe they will! Worth a try! A loose necktie (talk) 17:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JusticeTrapsTheGuilty001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This file already exists on Commons at higher resolution and with the same name and with the licence Template:PD-US-not renewed. If that is valid the local copy can be deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quick search shows no copyright renewals. Likely ok. -FASTILY 01:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pierre Mornand.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Moved the local file to File:Pierre Mornand 1.jpg. I doubt the Commons file will be kept -FASTILY 07:26, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a freely licenced image of the same subject on Commons, but it's under discussion for deletion. If the Commons file is kept and assuming its of the same subject the local file ought to be deleted per WP:NFCC#1 Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Siddhartha Shankar Ray.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: File on Commons was deleted. Closing as resolved. -FASTILY 00:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a file on the same subject and same name on Commons. The Commons file is under discussion for deletion; if it's kept the local file can be deleted per WP:NFCC#1. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Weeknd - After Hours (Target edition).jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 April 21. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Weeknd - After Hours (Target edition).jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Weeknd - After Hours (Remixes).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 April 21. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Weeknd - After Hours (Remixes).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kantatar10.jpg.w560h370.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article has a poster, this non-free image does not follow minimal usage of NFCCP. Titodutta (talk) 20:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The screenshot is used in the plot section against WP:FILMNFI in that the plot section describes the film and is not critical commentary of the image itself. There is no critical commentary of the image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 03:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kantatar100.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article has a poster (non-free), this non-free image does not follow minimal usage of NFCCP (and does not add much value as well). Titodutta (talk) 20:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The screenshot is used in the Cast section and there is no critical commentary of the image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 03:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sjuangarita.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is unused and it is taken from a website so we cant verify the license. MGA73 (talk) 21:12, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:47, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:User-Candlewicke DYK 2008 Meteor Awards, Mick Pyro, Some Surprise, The Cake Sale (album), The Cake Sale, Brian Crosby, Mulkerrin Brothers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this *one* partiular image because it is currently orphaned and I can not see any encyclopedic use for it. I am bring it here because the uploader is absense since March 2017 and I can not ask him/her. There are currently over 100 simmilar type of images by this uploader ([1] and while have I obviously have not looked at all of them, those that I have looked at are orphaned as well. I am looking for some concensus to delete the similar images for deletion, but do not want to spend the time Prod-ing them if there is some valid reason for their existance. Perhaps someone with Main Page experince can way in. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:05, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If it is not in use there is no reason to keep it. So I think it is safe to delete all unused screenshots unless you find a good reason to keep it. For example I would keep a screenshot if it shows the exact time that the counter on the front page shows "6,000,000 articles in English". Thank you Jordan 1972 for cleaning up! --MGA73 (talk) 08:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.