Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 March 2

< March 1	March 3 >

March 2

File:Marian Hill photograph.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Probably Flickrwash. XXN, 00:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maserati Gransport Coupe - blue.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The original flickr picture is published under the CC-BY-NC license - incompatible with Wikipedia. XXN, 00:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maserati Gransport - white.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The original picture is published on flickr under the CC-BY-NC license - incompatible with Wikipedia. XXN, 00:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maserati Gransport Spyder - red.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The original picture is published on flickr under the CC-BY-NC license - incompatible with Wikipedia. XXN, 00:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MaryJanice Davidson publicity photo 2010 freely licensed.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flickrwash (see also the metadata). XXN, 00:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Middle angel21.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo - out of scope. XXN, 00:43, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zimmerman-charles-s-1939.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Marxists Internet Archive Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Melchiot-Wigan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The original picture is published on flickr under the CC-BY-NC license - incompatible with Wikipedia. XXN, 01:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

22 Bishopsgate images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept one and deleted two. Remaining image moved to the infobox - Peripitus (Talk) 09:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple non-free renderings of the proposed skyscraper are used in this article. In aggregate, they fail WP:NFCC#3a as only one image would be sufficient. File:22 Bishopsgate revised design.jpg is currently occupying the infobox. However, the image is of a whole group of skyscrapers, and quite honestly, I have no clue which is the subject building so I feel it fails the purpose of providing the visual identification for the subject. File:22 Bishopsgate, London.jpg does a much better job of this so my recommednation if to keep this image and remove the other two. Whpq (talk) 01:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To address the last two concerns, the image recommended to keep is an old design proposal so doesn't identify the subject building. Secondly, the new render used in the main article is the only one available as far as I can see and I have tried to address the issue of multiple buildings in the image by writing a caption underneath the image in the article to make the subject building more identifiable. Lastly, the proposed building has been subject to three significant redesigns, so the two older images show previous designs which are written about in detail in the article as part of the building's history, so I believe are easily covered by WP:NFCC#8 'contextual significance'. --LegereScire (talk) 08:45, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-free images outside of the infobox. WP:NFCC#8 contextual significance means that the images are only excluded to the detriment of the reader's understanding. There is nothing written about the former designs that must be illustrated or else risk detriment to the reader's understanding. The solar panels and size relative to other buildings can be understood adequately through text. And if those features matter in the final design, they can be noted in the main infobox image—the only non-free image relatively needed in the article. czar 18:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Truth2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is an orphaned image. I can't think of any encyclopedic use for it, but maybe I'm just not understanding what it's showing. Any ideas? (N.B. the uploader is User:Jjbeard but I think the account may have been moved to Jjbeard~enwiki? Not clear to me). Ajpolino (talk) 02:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wade Martin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Brianga (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work, appears to be a promo picture, very similar to [1] — Train2104 (t • c) 07:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Real Housewives of Miami S3 cast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-free cast photo that is claimed to be used as the primary means of identification in The Real Housewives of Miami, but that role is taken by the infobox image. The cast photo is simply being used to illustrate the cast of some of the seasons. As all of the cast members are living people, and play themselves in the shows, these images are replaceable with free images. livelikemusic talk! 14:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The cast of the first season of The Real Housewives of Dallas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-free cast photo that is claimed to be used as the primary means of identification in The Real Housewives of Dallas, but that role is taken by the infobox image. The cast photo is simply being used to illustrate the cast of some of the seasons. As all of the cast members are living people, and play themselves in the shows, these images are replaceable with free images. livelikemusic talk! 14:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Real Housewives of New York City season 8 cast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-free cast photo that is claimed to be used as the primary means of identification in The Real Housewives of New York City, but that role is taken by the infobox image. The cast photo is simply being used to illustrate the cast of some of the seasons. As all of the cast members are living people, and play themselves in the shows, these images are replaceable with free images. livelikemusic talk! 14:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RHODC Season 1 Cast.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-free cast photo that is claimed to be used as the primary means of identification in The Real Housewives of D.C., but that role is taken by the infobox image. The cast photo is simply being used to illustrate the cast of some of the seasons. As all of the cast members are living people, and play themselves in the shows, these images are replaceable with free images. livelikemusic talk! 14:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Real Housewives of Vancouver season 2 cast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-free cast photo that is claimed to be used as the primary means of identification in The Real Housewives of Vancouver, but that role is taken by the infobox image. The cast photo is simply being used to illustrate the cast of some of the seasons. As all of the cast members are living people, and play themselves in the shows, these images are replaceable with free images. livelikemusic talk! 14:32, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Real Housewives of Sydney season 1 cast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-free cast photo that is claimed to be used as the primary means of identification in The Real Housewives of Sydney, but that role is taken by the infobox image. The cast photo is simply being used to illustrate the cast of some of the seasons. As all of the cast members are living people, and play themselves in the shows, these images are replaceable with free images. livelikemusic talk! 14:32, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The cast of the first season of The Real Housewives of Auckland.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-free cast photo that is claimed to be used as the primary means of identification in The Real Housewives of Auckland, but that role is taken by the infobox image. The cast photo is simply being used to illustrate the cast of some of the seasons. As all of the cast members are living people, and play themselves in the shows, these images are replaceable with free images. livelikemusic talk! 14:33, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joe Mercer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not okay license. Reading Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr and the image at flickr the symbols at top of flickr image corresponds to CC-BY-NC-SA which is not okay per the wikipedia flickr upload guide. Qed237 (talk) 15:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please outline the qualms that you would have with the aforementioned imagging file in question. This is so as one has endeavoured towards adhering to Wikipedia's Creative Commons policies and guidelines, rationale & equivalence as in such a case.Silverfish4; (talk)

As I said the image is uploaded to flickr under CC BY-NC-SA which is not okay to use on wikipedia. Qed237 (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If we only go by the Flickr licensing, then this file cannot be released under a free license suitable for Wikipedia because the file is licensed as CC-by-NC-SA which does not allow commercial use. I'm pretty sure that only CC licenses which do not place any restrictions on commercial use are considered free enough for Wikipedia's purpose. I do have some concerns, however, as to whether the Flickr uploader is actually the original copyright holder of the file. The photo looks quite old and as if it is a scan which was uploaded to Flickr. I don't have much experience with Flickr so I'm not sure if any vetting goes on when files are uploaded. It could be like YouTube, when pretty much anything is allowed until someone complains or files a DCMA takedown request. Anyway, if someone is able to show that the file originated somewhere else and that the Flickr uploader is actually (intentionally or unintentionally) claiming copyright over a file which is in the public domain, etc. Then, I think thus licensing can be adjusted accordingly and the file kept. That's a big if of course, and it needs to be clearly shown to be the case. Otherwise, I think the file should be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Flickr will not do anything about uploads unless the copyright holder makes a complaint. -- Whpq (talk) 02:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George Allison.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. The symbols at flickr [2] shows the symbols that is not okay according to Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr. Qed237 (talk) 15:47, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please outline the qualms that you would have with the aforementioned imagging file in question. This is so as one has endeavoured towards adhering to Wikipedia's Creative Commons policies and guidelines, rationale & equivalence as in such a case.Silverfish4; (talk)

As I said the image is uploaded to flickr under CC BY-NC-SA which is not okay to use on wikipedia. Qed237 (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I posted something similar for the File:Joe Mercer.jpg discussion above, but this file cannot be released under a free license suitable for Wikipedia because the file is licensed as CC-by-NC-SA which does not allow commercial use. Only CC licenses which do not place any restrictions on commercial use are considered free enough for Wikipedia's purpose. As with the Mercer image, I do have some concerns as to whether the Flickr uploader is actually the original copyright holder of the file. The photo looks quite old and as if it is a scan which was uploaded to Flickr. So, if someone is able to show that the file originated somewhere else and that the Flickr uploader is actually (intentionally or unintentionally) claiming copyright over a file which is in the public domain, etc. Then, I think thus licensing can be adjusted accordingly and the file kept. That's a big if of course, and it needs to be clearly shown to be the case. Otherwise, I think the file should be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michel Jourdain.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prudenceliew2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality, unfixable. Unused and unusable. No need to transfer it to Commons. XXN, 19:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The book cover of "Amabor".jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of a book cover. Should be considered copyrighted until an OTRS ticket with licensing status is confirmed. But is un-necessary, IMO (questionable notability, low quality). XXN, 22:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Keith D Black Cannes 2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Probably Flickrwash. XXN, 22:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture of Sarz, Nigerian Music Producer, Jan 2015.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Staged professional photo, likely not own work — Train2104 (t • c) 22:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bola Akindele Potrait.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Staged professional photo, likely not own work — Train2104 (t • c) 22:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eclipse (Rapper) in 2015.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Staged professional photo, likely not own work — Train2104 (t • c) 22:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Leriq in 2015.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Staged professional photo, likely not own work — Train2104 (t • c) 22:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dotman, at a Photoshoot, Jan 2001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Staged professional photo, watermarked, likely not own work — Train2104 (t • c) 22:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dotman In Lagos, 2001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Staged professional photo, extremely large file size, likely not own work — Train2104 (t • c) 22:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brent Wilson Live In 2005.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flickrwash. XXN, 22:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kenny Harris 2014.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsuccessfully retouched picture; unused. Exists at Commons as File:Kenny Harris in 2014 (12334190135).jpg in original, transferred from Flickr. XXN, 22:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.