Wikipedia:Editor review/mynameinc (2)

mynameinc (talk · contribs · count) I recently surpassed 2000 edits, and I wanted to know if I was still doing everything right. I have had minor disputes with editors, but that is all in the past. mynameinc^{Ottoman project} 12:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Review by  JUJUTACULAR | TALK 

• I see that after requesting this review in May you posted that have {{retired}} in June. I am hopeful that you will come back and contribute to the encyclopedia. In reviewing your past contributions, I can see many valuable additions. Your work seems very thoughtful and clueful. Your work in military history seems to be quite substantial, and you should be proud of it.
• I've seen a few instances of heated discussions with you and other users. From time to time every editor will run into those that disagree with them, and this case it's always best to keep a cool head. If you find yourself unable to respond calmly, simply take a short wikibreak. Come back and respond when you're able. One of the best things about being an editor here is that it is voluntary.
• Again, if you do see this, I hope that you will come back and contribute. Wikipedia needs all the help it can get. Thanks.  JUJUTACULAR | TALK  15:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?

   My primary contributions are my created articles and reverted vandalism. I am particularly pleased with New York City ethnic enclaves, B-Class, Good Article nominee, brought from Stub.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   Yes, I have been in conflicts over editing, and I may get aggressive and inflamed, but I try to stay calm.