Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 30
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Speedily Approved.
Operator: DannyS712 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 09:47, Saturday, April 20, 2019 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: supervised
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: Pywikipedia
Function overview: Update Wikipedia:Database reports/Polluted categories (3)
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): 1 edit per run, run as needed
Estimated number of pages affected: 1
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: Using PAWS and pywikibot, update Wikipedia:Database reports/Polluted categories (3). The update code doesn't work perfectly yet, so some of the category names are broken, but overall it would be a net benefit. I've tested it on the test wiki, and the current output is visible at Special:Permalink/893288113.
Code available at: https://paws-public.wmflabs.org/paws-public/User:DannyS712_bot/Polluted%20categories%20(3).ipynb
Discussion
[edit]- @DannyS712:, what length or type of trial would you prefer for this task? I would normally default to either 25 or 50 edits, but given that it is one edit per run I thought I'd ask your input on what you think would be a good trial for this task. --TheSandDoctor Talk 23:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @TheSandDoctor: Maybe something like 5 edits? The code is by no means perfect, but it only edits 1 page and usually only when I want the page to be updated so I can use it again. I have a number of such pending database reports that I'd like to run, so maybe something like 3 edits each or even speedy approval? One page per task, code already tested. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 00:07, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedily Approved. this is only for one page, that was created just for this purpose, and is low volume. — xaosflux Talk 00:27, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.