Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yu-Gi-Oh! Go Rush!!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify and move protect using Extended confirmed protection. The article is now located at Draft:Yu-Gi-Oh! Go Rush!!. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:35, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yu-Gi-Oh! Go Rush!! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yu-Gi-Oh! Go Rush!!

Upcoming television series that does not satisfy television notability or general notability because Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Moved back from article space to draft space once by User:Onel5969, and then redacted to remove copyvio, and then moved back to article space without improvement; but removing the copyvio did not add content. The only reference is a product announcement, which is neither independent nor secondary. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify. I agree the topic fails WP:GNG at present. That being said, Yu-Gi-Oh! is a very popular series and this will likely be notable in about a month when it starts airing, since all the other spin-offs are notable. A redirect to Yu-Gi-Oh!#Anime with the {{R with possibilities}} template can also be created. Link20XX (talk) 01:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify (with mainspace title redirected to Yu-Gi-Oh!#Anime) or Keep Currently, all the coverage I see is the announcement of the anime, which isn't enough to support an article past stub status. However, as Link noted the notability is near guaranteed once the series starts airing in 1 month (February went by fast!). It might be a bit WP:BURO to draftify it for that short of a time. Jumpytoo Talk 01:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify but move-protected. I think without being protected from moves, this page would stay in Draft space for a matter of minutes or hours before being moved back to main space. The same thing happens with all upcoming media/entertainment products, fans want to get the article in main space as soon as possible, whether or not it is ready. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:15, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify and possibly move-protect pro-tem per Liz, to minimise 'fan' disruption. Eagleash (talk) 07:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify - clearly not ready for mainspace, and definitely move protect. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Like every new anime, info for it comes out every few weeks through main website or other official sources. SpectresWrath (talk) 03:06, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Reliable sources give it significant coverage. https://comicbook.com/anime/news/yu-gi-oh-go-rush-new-anime-2022/ https://www.cbr.com/yu-gi-oh-new-anime-go-rush/ https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2021-12-17/yu-gi-oh-go-rush-anime-announced-with-april-2022-premiere/.180735 and I assume many others. This a massively popular long running series, so a new show is sure to get ample coverage, and there is enough information to write a proper article from. Dream Focus 07:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I concur with the recommendation to draftify and move-protect. I would add that the move-protection should be ECP-protection rather than admin-protection. Not necessary to get an admin to approve; an AFC reviewer should be able to accept. Also, I didn't draftify because another unilateral draftification would have been move-warring. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify - It does not matter if it is "sure to get ample coverage" -- it does not have it as of right now, so there is no point for it to be in main space. Rin (talk) 15:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify for now, to be recreated in the likely case it gets more coverage like most anime does eventually these days. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify and move-protect, as per Liz. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:46, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify and move-protect, per Liz. The sources offered above are from specialized outlets, and I would expect some coverage outside of it, but for now there's none I can find. I'm sure it will gain traction in the days leading up to airing. Pilaz (talk) 00:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.