Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilaste Station
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep [Nomination withdrawn] (non-admin closure) Flori4nKT A L K 21:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lilaste Station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
nn per NBUILD / GNG Flori4nKT A L K 10:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Flori4nKT A L K 10:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. Flori4nKT A L K 10:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. We generally keep all railway stations. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - as User:Necrothesp - railway stations are normally kept. Ingratis (talk) 23:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- I have added a little more content and another source to the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.