Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2 in the AM PM
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to J.G. Quintel. LFaraone 01:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- 2 in the AM PM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability has not been established and the only sources I seem to find are various blogs and video websites Difficultly north (talk) - Simply south alt. 13:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:05, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:05, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Redirect to J.G. Quintel as an existing film which acts as one of Quintel's earliest works and one which inspired character creation in his later and more notable projects. I could not find sourcing enough to establish separate notability... and it IS already spoken of in context in both the J.G. Quintel and Regular Show articles. SCHMIDT, Michael Q. 01:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:51, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect. The only notability appears to be because of the film's creator. This is the only justification given to notability in the article: "Being online since 2006, the video alone has received over 1,400,000 million viewers." Aside from being unsourced, it's not enough to satisfy any applicable notability standard. Andrew327 15:45, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.