User talk:Thanar

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Juggling world records do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'youtube\.com' (link(s): http://youtube.com/watch?v=bVrVM5-4SRg) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 00:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A belated note to say that the above warning from the XLinkBot turned out to be unfounded, as the YouTube links that triggered it link to the required video evidence (primary sources) of the records listed on the page. Thanar (talk) 23:52, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good get! --Lou Sander (talk) 05:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Max Holden (magic) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jay-Sebastos (talk) 05:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming that the above message is the product of someone using a semi-automated anti-vandalism tool? I changed the broken link that I stumbled upon (produced by { { SeeMagicPedia } } which broke due to the (magic) at the end of Max Holden) into a link that actually worked. But perhaps MagicPedia should not be externally linked to, I'm not sure. It may fall under the category "Links to open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors." mentioned in the list of Links normally to be avoided at Wikipedia:External links - If that is the case, there are 39 other links that should be removed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=magicpedia&sourceid=Mozilla-search as well as the SeeMagicPedia template. It does seem as though there has been some cross-pollination with MagicPedia in the past, for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Leeasher Thanar (talk) 05:48, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. Trying to catch the most vandals in the least amount of time sometimes mean that helpful people like yourself get wrongly caught in my endeavors! Have restored your version. Jay-Sebastos (talk) 06:09, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. I learned some things through the experience, in any case, including a better way to fix the brokenness of the link by using a feature of the template. Thanar (talk) 06:12, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work in keeping the Juggling world records page up to date. It is a valuable resource that we all appreciate. Fortpinepitch (talk) 06:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:RS for our guidelines on reliable sources. Primary video evidence is not reliable; see WP:PRIMARY. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where on WP:PRIMARY does it state that primary video evidence is not reliable? Thanar (talk) 04:19, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be more complicated than simply not allowing links to videos as sources: "There is no blanket ban on linking to YouTube or other user-submitted video sites through external links or when citing sources." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Video_links Thanar (talk) 04:19, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, there is no blanket ban. But your videos are not produced by reliable news media, for instance--they are self-made. Drmies (talk) 04:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The argument that they are self-made, therefore they cannot be a reliable source is also incorrect. It means it may not be acceptable, but it depends on the situation: "For this reason, self-published media is often not acceptable as a source. Self-published videos may be used as sources of information about their creator if they meet the requirements seen at restrictions on using self-published sources. The community sometimes accepts videos from the official YouTube channels of subjects, but this is not a guarantee of approval with content being unduly self-serving being just one concern." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Video_links Thanar (talk) 04:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, the video is the direct evidence of the record itself. This evidence is combined with a reliable secondary source for that interpretation, the descriptions of the established regulations with secondary sources. Thanar (talk) 04:36, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of them had only a video link for evidence, and I have my doubts about the reliability of some of the other sources--indeed, I have my doubts about some of the records in the first place. The status of for instance the Bounce Page, and the organization that seems to run it, Bounce Juggling World Records, is not at all clear. Drmies (talk) 04:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand the logic behind rejecting unreliable video evidence. However, the Juggling world records page is a unique resource for the juggling community, and the videos that it refers to are well accepted primary sources. Removing the video links would cripple the value of this page. Fortpinepitch (talk) 05:09, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thanar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thanar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thanar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]