User talk:Rexxx7777

Hi Rexxx7777! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Cory Morris, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 01:53, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the image individually clipped: [1] and the rest of the article if you want to include it for the page: [2] Inexpiable (talk) 23:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Article has been published. Rexxx7777 (talk) 20:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please upload all future free images to Wikimedia Commons instead of Wikipedia itself. Kingofthedead (talk) 01:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will Do. Rexxx7777 (talk) 01:10, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Collins death.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rexxx7777

Thank you for creating Vernon Lee Clark.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good Job

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 20:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ivan-Page.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sgt.GonzalezKillers.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		This is a good article: 2000 Wilkinsburg shooting. Thank you so much for all of your work related to crime and serial killer articles. Your efforts are appreciated. Keep up the good work. Inexpiable (talk) 21:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rexxx7777. Thank you for your work on Murder of Joann Lee Tiesler. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rexxx7777. Thank you for your work on Lezmond Charles Mitchell. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Bronny James, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically per MOS:NICKNAME, they are generally only presented separately if they can replace the subject's entire name. "Bronny", however, is only used in lieu of his given name, "LeBron", e.g. "Bronny James". —Bagumba (talk) 14:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rexxx7777. Thank you for your work on Thang Thanh Nguyen. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000 Wilkinsburg shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kari Lake shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:52, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any intention of following WP:BRD on this BLP with DS? – Muboshgu (talk) 16:54, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All I'm going to say is why not add the current investigation into the envelope mailed to her headquarters. Multiple reliable sources have reported on it and I try to add it neutrally and keep it a matter of fact but you keep reverting it. Rexxx7777 (talk) 16:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Jim Risch, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. CastJared (talk) 01:39, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:52, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As part of admin enforcement in this contentious topic area, Joe Biden was placed under a 24-hour BRD restriction. Per the message at the talk page, after an edit of your is reverted, "you may not reinstate your edit until you post a talk page message discussing your edit and have waited 24 hours from the time of this talk page message". Please self-revert your added content and start up a talk page discussion. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:52, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rexxx7777. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Carrington (accused killer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rexxx7777, the "rawstory.com" source added at 2023 Covenant School shooting is a known-unreliable one (WP:RSP#The_Raw_Story). The information does seem to be verifiable from less untrustworthy sources, though, and other editors have changed the article to address this issue. I had originally placed a red warning message here; this now seems unnecessary, so I'm replacing it with this message here. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please review our policy at WP:NPOV. Your recent edit with the summary "keeping it neutral" violated that policy. SPECIFICO talk 23:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rexxx7777. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Carrington".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Kean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rexxx7777, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Controversy over Joe Biden's competence, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversy over Joe Biden's competence.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 08:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely jumped the gun, please delete it. Rexxx7777 (talk) 00:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Public image of Chris Christie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. I noticed you said that this was published by accident, so the article can be removed while you don't want to publish this article. GoodCrossing (talk) 22:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Josh Shapiro has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 25stargeneral (talk) 03:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rex, please be advised that the page is under active arbitration remedies and that you "may not reinstate your edit until you post a talk page message discussing your edit and have waited 24 hours from the time of this talk page message". This edit violated the rule. I had challenged the addition of the material here. Please, self-revert. Space4Time3Continuum2x ^(cowabunga) 17:52, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Trumpmug2023.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rexxx7777. Thank you for your work on 1994 Newark mayoral election. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:45, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I hope you're doing well and had a nice holiday season. I noticed that on the article Mel Carnahan and a few other Missouri articles, you added new photos. Firstly, thank you for doing that, it is an appreciated addition to the articles. But my question is under what license did you put it under? I tried reading the Wikipedia guide and did not understand it. I have photos I want to upload from the same source (Missouri state archives on Flickr), and figured since you did it, you might know more about this. Thank you in advance for any response, I hope you have a wonderful day, and thanks again for uploading these new photos. All the best. FountofInterestingInfo (talk) 00:12, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. Its easy; Since you're getting these photos from this Flickr page, which has photos under the Public Domain license, when uploading your photo put PD-author-FlickrPDM in the license category. Then, put FlickreviewR next to it so an official can review and confirm it can be used on wiki (which will be done after uploading it). Once that's done, you should be good. I hope this helped. Rexxx7777 (talk) 00:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded a photo to Wiki now. Thanks for your help. All the best. FountofInterestingInfo (talk) 01:17, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jesse-Jackson Bob-Graham meeting.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 11:33, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I saw this addition to the list of inmates. I appreciate the effort to contribute! Anyhow, I think that adding prisoners who were only incarcerated in Huntsville Unit on the days of their executions (as opposed to be on death row in Huntsville, which hasn't happened since 1965) would be redundant from a list of prisoners in Texas executed since 1928. The Huntsville prisoner list should only have people who were non-DR prisoners, or DR prisoners from 1928 to 1965.

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 08:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rexxx7777. Thank you for your work on Emanuel Lovell Webb. Another editor, Lightburst, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for the serial killer article. Keep on writing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 18:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2006 Broward County murders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bahamian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rexxx7777. Please provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Summaries help other editors by (a) providing a reason for the edit, (b) saving the time to open up the edit to find out what it's all about, and (c) providing information about the edit on diff pages and lists of changes (such as page histories and watchlists).

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.

As a reminder: When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Many who are ignorant of edit summaries fail to add them. Some ignore this basic brief task; however, failure seems arrogant and inconsiderate specially since they are so easy to add. Also, according to Wikipedia's consensus policy, all edits should be explained —either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page. Thank you Rexxx7777 for your consideration. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 02:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]