User talk:Kumagoro-42

Hello, Kumagoro-42! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Stardust8212 20:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Sorry you're having some stress about editing. I had a look at the specific edits you made and I think the reason both were undone was because of your descriptions of Amy as "hot". The key item to remember is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and we have to keep our own thoughts and opinions out of it. That being said, descriptions such "hot" and "beautiful" about animated characters tend to strike other editors as representing a single person's point of view, not everyone will think an animated character should be described that way. All I can advise is to keep trying and consider reading some articles listed at WP:FA, articles which have been identified as the best on Wikipedia, to see what is expected and to get some ideas of how to improve the current articles. If you feel like you have an important addition to an article and you find that it is being reverted consistently then consider discussing it on the article's talk page and get some opinions on why it is being deleted and how it could be improved. Good luck and let me know if you need any help with specific issues! Stardust8212 02:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your answer. I perfectly understand that is crucial to not show gratuitos personal opinions in someone's article (that is true for Wikipedia, but also for all serious journalist works). The point is: these adjectives doesn't reflect my point of view on both Amy and Leela, but the creators' point of view, as being explicited many times during audio commentaries (I can provide direct quote, if you feel they will be needed). The fact that Futurama includes some female characters intentionally depicted as very attractive in a way (although with "quirks", i.e. Leela's monocular eye, etc.) is a peculiar feature of the show. Maybe I choosed the wrong adjectives, but I wanted to fix what I feel as a decriptive lack: someway I feel that these characters presentations is too much "asexuated", and do not reflect one of the aspect of their intended design and personalities. Other than that, the fact that Fry is constantly seeking to being loved by Leela through the show (leading to much appreciated episodes such as "Parasite Lost"), is a dominant fact for the character, as well as the fact that Leela would be all in all a very attractive woman if not for her unique eye. These elements are left out the description, and I thinks that's a very wrong and unbalanced way to look at the characters. Last, why professor Farnsworth is not meant to be decribed as an "absent-minded" man, a trait he always show in all the episodes? I feel these descriptions concentrate over all the secondary elements and don't catch some of the main elements. Please let me know what you think about that. Do you think I should open a discussion about these matters? Kumagoro-42 03:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think if you really feel these elements are lacking from the articles then it is best to bring it up on the respective talk pages. It is also best to find reliable, secondary sources which indicate that this is a significant aspect of the character (the Amy Wong page in particular is lacking in this regard). Stardust8212 03:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. --Maniwar (talk) 19:57, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you're invited and express your views on Talk:When Marnie Was There#Edits reverted without adding summary. Jotamide (talk) 18:53, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of time travel science fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brad Anderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Fixed it. Kumagoro-42 11:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen Frears, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chéri. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kanchenjungha (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Babel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fernando Arrabal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Shannon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lost River (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vamps (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clueless. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hailee Steinfeld

added links pointing to John Carney and Daniel Barber

Mockumentary

added a link pointing to Drop Dead Gorgeous

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hugh Perceval, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Fallen Idol and Night Beat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tiptoes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Susan Barnes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kumagoro-42. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film#"Lists" vs. prose about lists. Pyxis Solitary (talk) 11:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(Notification per WP:CAN.)

In a recent edit to the page Trollhunter, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Indrek (talk) 11:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reverted by two editors at Jennifer Lawrence. The proper course of action would be to invite discussion on the article talk page and determine consensus. To repeatedly revert to your version of the article is edit warring (see WP:Edit warring and Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle). Violating this policy jeopardizes your editing privilege. It would be best if you self revert and begin a discussion on the article talk page. Tiderolls 00:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I already reverted and started a discussion in the editors' pages. Most of my edit was about mere fact-checking (wrong release dates, wrong links), being thrown away with choices they didn't agree upon and I'm discussing now. Kumagoro-42 00:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the I Know What You Did Last Summer plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 05:19, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature should contain at least one link to your userpage or user talkpage. WP:SIGLINK is the relevant policy. You should change your custom signature to link to that or use the default signature. If you need help with that, just comment here as I'm watching this page. Galobtter (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kumagoro-42. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brittany Allen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! There's a few BCS-related articles that need work at the moment such as Nacho Varga, Kim Wexler and Mike Ehrmantraut. I would be very obliged if you could give me a hand. Thanks. The Optimistic One (talk) 03:32, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@The Optimistic One: Sure, what kind of work? I won't be able to do much this week, though. Kumagoro-42 (talk) 04:33, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing much for Kim, it just needs more content for the reception section and the biography needs to be trimmed. I'll be able to handle Mike, just need to add some plot information about Better Call Saul, Nacho's has no biography for the third season and like Kim, needs more content for the reception section. Thanks. The Optimistic One (talk) 05:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give a look to Kim and Nacho later in the week. Kumagoro-42 (talk) 05:55, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! The Optimistic One (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@The Optimistic One: I'm very sorry, I just realized I never did this in the end. I got sick right after that, and then forgot. The beginning of the new season reminded me. Did you manage to do the revisions yourself? I doubt I'll be able to do it now, too busy at work for the time being. Kumagoro-42 (talk) 12:13, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine. These problems have been sorted. No harsh feelings. The Optimistic One (talk) 20:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kumagoro-42. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eternity and a Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]