User talk:JPxG/Archive10

This is an archive of past discussions $5 $2. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current $4 page.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39

This page has archives. Sections older than 12 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 10 sections are present.

Hello! Your submission of Stony Island (Michigan) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ZKang123 (talk) 02:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stony Island (Michigan) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stony Island (Michigan) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stony Island (Michigan) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Headreach Island you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hog Island (San Joaquin County) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fox Island (Detroit River) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fordson Island you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stony Island (Michigan) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stony Island (Michigan) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 07:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hog Island (San Joaquin County) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hog Island (San Joaquin County) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fordson Island you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fordson Island for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

The article Mallard II you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mallard II for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 18:41, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mallard II you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mallard II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:21, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spud Island you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:41, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tule Island you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:41, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Spud Island you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Spud Island for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Stephen: Thanks! jp×g 09:00, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Potential London NFL franchise on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JPxG, hope all is well! I am reaching out because there is an important ongoing discussion at Talk:Silicon Valley#RfC: Inclusion criteria of Silicon Valley, Santa Clara Valley and Santa Clara County, California concerning whether Silicon Valley is a region or simply a monicker for the local tech industry and whether it should be regarded as such both in its article and in references to it across Wikipedia. I invite you to join the discussion and present your thoughts on the matter, as more opinions are sorely needed to build any type of understanding or consensus. Whether you agree with my arguments or not, your opinion is valuable to the discussion. Best, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 05:37, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Abolitionism in the United States on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:African American studies on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Country data Afghanistan on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Yoruba people on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox comics character on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Vladimir Putin on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ur obseesed with me — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.246.71.95 (talk • contribs)

Your edits are sus, what am I supposed to do? jp×g 23:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)\[reply]

haha you said sus hahaha so funny among us reference so funny

Me and my buddies were calling stuff "sus" back in like 2014, but for the record, I do think amogus references are funny (although I haven't played the game). jp×g 23:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the first edit summary was perfectly adequate, but to be clear, the tweet has been deleted so we need a reliable source for this statement in a BLP. Do not restore without a source.31.219.89.42 (talk) 05:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@31.219.89.42: What if an archived version of the post could be found? jp×g 05:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You reverted my edits and left me a message saying "removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary". If you had actually looked at the edit summary, you would have noticed that it mentioned the talk page, where the edits were extensively explained. This sort of behaviour can be quite disruptive, so it would be appreciated if you would refrain from it. 2404:2D00:5000:841:8CD7:6427:A34C:5D4B (talk) 10:36, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@2404:2D00:5000:841:8CD7:6427:A34C:5D4B: After I got a notification that my edit had been reverted, I checked the talk page; indeed, you'd asked a couple days earlier if anyone had an objection, so it was not a good revert in the first place and I decided to leave it alone. My apologies. I do disagree that the section is "too bloated", but I will not raise a fuss over it. jp×g 10:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

here's the diff: i removed content tagged as contradictory since may 2021 for the following reason: XDG Base Directory Specification is for user directories (except $XDG_DATA_DIRS); this is not about the computer's file system hierarchy as described in this article. which is absolutely true. contrary to what you said i added a comment for my edit, though very concise: not relevant which is also true. i'm sick of stupid patrollers reverting ips on a subject on which they don't know jack just because they're ips: you probably didn't even read my modification! If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. LOL 2A01:E0A:4EA:8C50:1B94:8B7C:846D:DD9E (talk) 15:51, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Hello IP! I'm not JPxG, however I am a talk page watcher. It appears JPxG reverted your edit because you didn't provide an adequate edit summary. If you'd like help on what to do with things like that there are a bunch of people at the Teahouse that would be happy to help you out! ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#0001} 17:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Iyopawa Island at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Joseph2302 (talk) 10:47, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JPxG. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Anarchyte (talk) 13:13, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I "Removed line that was not supported by the reference..." and you asked me for a reference? How can I provide a reference to support the fact that a statement is not supported by its reference???? No one is criticizing the NCMEC - they are criticizing Apple.

It was a criticism of a joint venture that both organizations went in on, and sources mention both of them (including the "screeching voices of the minority" comments). I don't think they would have gotten mentioned in every article unless there was something to justify it -- it's not like they were incidentally involved. Everyone was probably using Schrader valves to fill up their tires to drive to the press conference, but that's not mentioned, whereas NCMEC is. jp×g 07:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the response. Your misunderstanding is in believing this is a joint venture. It is not. The Center's relation to the privacy-impacting changes is in fact little more than incidental. Verizon, Google, Microsoft, Dropbox, Facebook, Twitter, Cloudflare, and hundreds of other companies run this same operation. They receive a set of CSAM hashes from NCMEC and use whatever means they decide to scan content on their system, match suspected imagery, and make reports. The Center purposefully remains at arms-length from implementation because - among other reasons - its charter and appropriation from Congress make any resulting prosecutions subject to 4th amendment issues.

Furthermore, if you need references, just look at who is being attributed for the 'plan' or 'tech' or 'updates' or 'features:'

• Apple has a new plan to curb child pornography. Here’s why it’s controversial
• Apple defends its new anti-child-abuse tech against privacy concerns
• Why Apple's child safety updates are so controversial
• Facebook's Former Security Chief Discusses Controversy Around Apple's Planned Child Safety Features

And you mention the "screeching" quote. Consider the entire thing:

Team Apple,

I wanted to share a note of encouragement to say that everyone at NCMEC is SO PROUD of each of you and the incredible decisions you have made in the name of prioritizing child protection.

It’s been invigorating for our entire team to see (and play a small role in) what you unveiled today...^[1]

The Center is no stranger to controversy around the methods its partners (NGOs, for-profits, and governments) may choose to stop the creation and transfer of CSAM and it purposefully stays at arms-length. This case is no different. There is no press release and I am sure no tweets about this from the Center. It is simply providing a limited service it is federally-required to provide. And Apple has no other choice -- the org is the only one which may legally maintain a database of such content and employ people to review it.

Hi JPxG, and excuse me for randomly popping up on your talk page uninvited.

You recently made some changes to Kshatriya Kulavantas, reverting the same problem edits that I had also changed previously and again, reverted since. You have changed it back more than once, as have I and other editors. That same editor, or several editors, is making similar edits on Hardauna, which you have also reverted, I think.

Anyway, I wanted to let you know, that if they make the same edit again - which they are almost certain to do - I won't be restoring it again. Unfortunately, my last reversion was undone by the anti-vandal bot, so I'm not going near the page again. It's routine WP stuff, I know, but I cannot stand that: It gives me the creeps, and makes me feel like I'm the one being "deprecated" - rather than that editor's alleged "sources"! So I'm just letting you know, in the hope you will continue to notice those pages / that editor, as you have been. Sorry for the long read. Thanks. 49.177.107.107 (talk) 12:34, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I certainly don't mind people popping in! Thanks for letting me know. I got confused for a minute when I was looking through the page history (I think I confused you with another IP address) but now I can see what you're talking about. It's messed up! I can't guarantee I will remember to keep an eye on it, but I'll do my best! jp×g 08:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is in response to the message you left on my talk page regarding an edit to “Jimmy McNulty”. I’m not sure why you’ve reverted the edit and asked for an explanation. I stated “deleted redundant information” as the summary of my edit. If you read the article, it would be plain to see that the paragraph I deleted repeats the content of a different paragraph and does not offer any additional info. I am going to restore my revision. 98.13.56.126 (talk) 01:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, JxPG has asked me to take a look since they're still watching the series, and upon review I think I agree with your deletion, although in future it may be helpful to state why information is redundant. Hope this helps, -- Asartea ^{Talk | Contribs} 08:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. This came up while I was patrolling RecentChanges; I would take a more in-depth look at the article to see what you're talking about, but I'm not finished watching The Wire, so I asked someone else to take a look it for me. If they say my revert was dumb, it was dumb, and feel free to override it. jp×g 22:09, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]