User talk:HunleyFinder

Hello HunleyFinder! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 20:23, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Frequently asked questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

== H.L. Hunley edits ==

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --AW 08:32, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I recently created a page on Dr. Mark M. Newell who was the official Director of the combined SCIAA NUMA Hunley Search Project that is widely credited with the discovery of the H.L. Hunley in 1995. Dr. Newell is not a business partner, personal friend or even someone I have ever socialized with. I created the page solely because I thought it was important that people understand who Newell is because of the important role he played in that expedition.

As you know, Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral. But, being neutral should not mean one has to ignore facts that help one side more than the other just so that both sides get equal play or equal credit. Equal play and credit may sound neutral but it is just the opposite when it means ignoring facts.

Imagine reporting the recent pet market bombings in Iraq. Some might think to make the coverage neutral one should go into great detail about the religious, historic and political motivation behind the attacks and why the attackers feel they were justified. To stay neutral the reporter might be tempted to leave out the atrocious facts regarding the cruel use and resulting deaths of the two retarded women who were used as walking bombs. But leaving out those facts, might make it look like both sides are equally right or equally wrong, it would not be neutral. Neutrality can be a difficult tightrope to walk and the facts can sometimes make it seem that the writer favors one side over the other, even though it is the facts that favor and not the writer. I think the facts are on my side and I don't mind presenting all in favor and all against.

Please understand, I have tried to be absolutely neutral and I have always been careful to add conflicting claims, even though I don't agree with them. This is a policy I follow even on my own websites, articles and books, where it is certainly not required. Another way that I try to stay neutral is by carefully documenting everything.--HunleyFinder (talk) 17:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I don't dispute that Spence is a member of Mensa, but the reference provided doesn't satisfy WP:RS unfortunately. I've referted his including for now, but if you have a source that satisfies the reliable sources policy, please re-add him. The link to the policy is provided above, please have a look. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 20:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Honey Fire Mustard web image.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:16, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JimBobUSA reverted all of my edits to the SS Georgiana page. Since most of my edits had consisted of the addition of straight historical facts and well documented information with citations, my first reaction was that the deletion of everything I had inserted was simple vandalism. Therefore, I reverted it back. However, on retrospect, I realize that (in the section on the importance of the Georgiana wreck site) I had implied criticism of unnamed State officials for their failure to visit and inspect the Georgiana wreck site for over 40 years after granting a salvage license to the site. I agree, that wasn't neutral on my part, so I have removed my implied criticism and stated only the facts involved. I also realized that JimBobUSA might have also objected to the linking of George Trenholm, who was the Georgiana's legal owner, to the fictional Rhett Butler (which was my original research that I first announced back in 1989), so I changed that part too. However, I do mention the connection because the links between Trenholm and Mitchell's fictional character are now well established and are mentioned in a number of more recent books by other historians, I will seek those books out and include references to them as well. Although I have been the compiler of much of the information on the Georgiana, virtually all of the information I have included about her is taken directly from contemporary newspaper articles, government documents, etc. and is not my "original work" in the sense that I did not create it or develop a theory from it, I merely repeated it. I plan to add citations to the original documents, so the source of the information will be clear. I hope my changes and efforts to cooperate are acceptable to everyone. People are welcome to call me at 843 532-8222 to discuss any questions or objections. They may also email me at hunleyfinder@yahoo.com. Sincerely, Lee HunleyFinder (talk) 16:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sidescan image of wreck of SS Osama.jpg, which you've attributed to Spence Trust Inc.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:13, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! As there is a Wikipedia article about you, you are cordially invited to contribute a short audio recoding of your spoken voice, so that our readers may know what you sound like and how you pronounce your name. Details of how to do so, and examples, are at Wikipedia:Voice intro project. Please feel free to ask for help or clarification on the project talk page, or my talk page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:41, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pano Kroko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pano Kroko until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC) Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hillary Hauser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Diving Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Diving Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RexxS (talk) 13:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]