User talk:Freakwars

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Holy Roman Empire, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 00:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Yannismarou (talk) 16:33, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Freakwars (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My latest edits were not vandalism, and were removed for no good reason that I am aware of. I would have cited my sources, but I do not know how. The source for my Pompey edit was In the Name of Rome, by Adrian Goldsworthy. It was also the source for my Pyrrhus edits. I admit that my first edits were vandalism, but I am no longer that immature.

Decline reason:

You were inserting blatant misinformation into articles. For example, here: [1] Pyrrhus is the source of the phrase "Pyrrhic victory" obviously because he won, not lost. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:41, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Freakwars (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The Romans won, but it was mostly through the fact that they were able to replace lost soldiers easier than Pyrrhus could.

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblocking provided. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.