User talk:Dwaipayanc/Archive 63

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Dwaipayanc. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 60

Archive 61

Archive 62

Archive 63

Archive 64

Archive 65

→

Archive 70

Hey Dwai, hope you are alright. Anyways, I will retire on Thursday, because I don't have time to edit Wikipedia and also greatly lost interest. But don't worry, I will return, but don't know when. Thanks for being such a great and kind friend.--Jionpedia ✉ 19:01, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Good news! Monsters University has passed the GA review!--Jionpedia ✉ 11:44, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Chandralekha (1948 film) has passed its GA review. I hope I am rewarded for having brought it from slumps to GA status in less than a year. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 03:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Please join Wikipedia "Greenwich Village In The 60s" Editathon on November 2, 2013! Everyone gather at Jefferson Market Library to further Wikipedia's local outreach for Greenwich Village articles on the history and the community. --Pharos (talk) 21:30, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

I really disagree with your reassessment as low importance. A tiny village in Mizoram low importance and Priyanka Chopra also low importance? I'd say the top film stars in the country are at least mid importance.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Zinta is now low importance, but Kapoor and Chopra and that cricketer mid-importance IMO. Perhaps this should be brought up at the Indian noticeboard.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

How can an article which gets 220,000 page views a month be ranked lowest importance?♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:51, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure though why you're going through assessing, I think it's a waste of time and makes little difference to the article or people working on it, but it's up to you what you do with your time of course! Probably not worth bringing it up but in assessing something I'd also look at page views a month as a deciding factor.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your input at the FAC Dwai! BTW I've made a proposal Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics which might interest you.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Can you help to fix this piece? Best,Patoldanga'r Tenida (talk) 20:18, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Bhojohori babu?? Wow!!! (BTW I love that song).Patoldanga'r Tenida (talk) 13:12, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

It seems that all your (and my) edits have been reverted, which makes me suspect that someone closely associated with the subject, and who does not care so much for the objective standards of Wikipedia, is reverting the edits. The "peacock" expressions are back. Maybe other editors can do justice to this piece.Patoldanga'r Tenida (talk) 17:13, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

On 4 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Swami Vivekananda, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Swami Vivekananda is credited with raising interfaith awareness and bringing Hinduism to the status of a major world religion during the late 19th century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Swami Vivekananda. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Another discussion for moving Kolkata to Calcutta is taking place at the talk page. Have a look. Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 15:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Again?! Same stuff at Talk:Swami Vivekananda. COMMONNAME's being tested everywhere. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:25, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

WP:COMMONNAME is becoming yet more and more problematic, as it reinforces US-centric attitudes and ignorance. There was a discussion recently at Talk:Viet Cong and the argument is pretty much the same (~"if we ain't know it, don't try teachin' us") --Soman (talk) 00:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Was busy in real life, could not comment on this, sorry. Thanks for all your help and comments in that discussion.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:28, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

এবার আমার পালা কেমন আছো জিজ্ঞেস করার। কবে ফিরে আসছ? Sohambanerjee1998 18:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Sands of New Mexico are enchanting I guess, evidently and apparently more than Wikipedia. Soham Banerjee 16:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Nevemind, answer the question I asked above, when will you return?   Sohambanerjee1998   11:34, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 Cricket World Cup Semifinal: India v Pakistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Cricket World Cup Semifinal: India v Pakistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – PeeJay 01:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal

Hello. I was looking up information on Bengal and found the wiki article to be long on the history of East Bengal/Bangladesh and short on West Bengal. Also, short shrift is given to the Hindu culture of Bengal and Hindu rule seems to be cast in a negative light with words such as "invasion" and "infiltration" while Muslim rulers are referenced in only neutral or positive terms. One must note that the non-Muslim history of Bengal stretches back much longer than its Muslim history. Most disturbingly, a thorough section on the East/West Pakistan conflict is followed by a very brief paragraph on West Bengal that makes it seem like a disaster of a state compared to the nation of Bangladesh.

I'm wondering who authored the article and if the author had been aware of his/her own biases.

I would appreciate if the editors/authors of this article would contribute a balance of objective, nonjudgmental material on Bengal's history, culture, demographics, and politics.

Thank you for reading. Windust00 (talk) 21:33, 17 November 2013 (UTC)windust00

Your observation on the use of the word "infiltration" was correct. That was a quite vague use. I have removed that part. However, I do not see any other areas where Hindu rulers are portrayed negatively, as you accused. The detailed history of 1947-1971 East Pakistan politics was unnecessary, and has now been removed. However, the Bangladesh Liberation War definitely needs significant coverage, and it is, I hope, there now. West Bengal history paragraph is pretty succinct I think. We do not need to add anything forcefully to equate the size of West Bengal and East Bengal paragraphs! The Eastern part has more important history details, and hence, needs to be covered.--Dwaipayan (talk) 22:44, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

The article Hindu pilgrimage sites in India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence is presented that these specific sites are pilgrimage sites. Some of them may be, some may not. In any event, I don't actually see how this list would be different than just a list of temples in India.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:23, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hindu pilgrimage sites in India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu pilgrimage sites in India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:42, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Watch the movie Proloy and specially the acting of Saswata. Amazing. --Tito☸Dutta 18:35, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

• Bring it at the top of your list. Sasawata is awesome. So is Paran B --Tito☸Dutta 07:28, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bamangachhi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ATM from TATA Communications Payment Solutions Ltd. (TCPSL), Jessore Road, Bamangachhi Chowmatha. (In West Bengal, only 16 Indicash ATMs are operational (as of November 2013).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the review; you caught some good stuff. Are you finished at this time? Do you think we should put one of those collapsible "resolved comment" banners around it? BollyJeff | talk 13:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I made the corrections from yesterday. Is there anything else I need to do? This review is only two up from the bottom of the list, so I fear that it could be archived at any moment. BollyJeff | talk 19:31, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. You may be right, but I get nervous when it gets near the bottom without many reviews and verdicts. BollyJeff | talk 13:10, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Subroto01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:55, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Can you please add the plot of the film, if and when you get a chance to watch it? Please, thanks again. Soham 13:37, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

No but have managed to earn the article a DYK so aiming for a GA . Don't know whether I'll succeed but its worth a shot. Soham 14:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Chances are very bleak though considering the fact that there is hardly any coverage so have to hunt down sources like that I am doing nowadays for APthefilm like ebela epaper. Soham 14:58, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

The article Gemini (2002 Tamil film) has been nominated as a candidate for Featured Article status, we would like to hear your comments on what needs to be done to improve the article with and focus on its compliance with FA criteria. If you have the time to review and critique the article, we would appreciate it. The FAC at: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Gemini (2002 Tamil film)/archive1. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 15:58, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Subroto01.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:10, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

The best Indian film I've ever seen. The old woman in it was awesome!! I'd love to help you promote it. Offhand I'd say the lead could use considerable expansion.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hey Dwai. I'll post their soon. Would have wanted to contribute to the article, but keeping really busy these days. :( --krimuk ⁹⁰ 08:43, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Mmmm... I read the Times of India article and yes, probably " being one of the most celebrated child actors in the industry once" and being the subject of a film by an award-winning director is a convincing claim of notability. Yes, you can create the stub but remember to add a reference to this ToI article (if it was included I would had not reverted it). My best, Cavarrone 21:09, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Watch first 10 mins of [1] Tito☸Dutta 23:47, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

On 16 December 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Subir Banerjee, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Subir Banerjee, who played Apu in Satyajit Ray's Pather Panchali (1955), never acted in any film afterwards? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Subir Banerjee. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Do you have this reference "Calcutta Medical College, The Centenary of the Medical College, Bengal, 1835–1934. Calcutta, 1935"? for the article on Calcutta Medical College?02:16, 2 December 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guru-45 (talk • contribs)

Do you think it is possible to get that book from a College Street bookstore?It is quite old(1934).And(to the limited extent I have been there),it is full of shops selling textbooks and textbooks.Guru-45 (talk) 11:59, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

What is the probability that the library of the college would have that book?Guru-45 (talk) 14:38, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

1st year.Guru-45 (talk) 15:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately,not yet(have sems soon).Guru-45 (talk) 15:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Soham (talk) 13:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Tito☸Dutta 17:33, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Hey Mr.Talkpage Stalker! Check the disclaimer section below the video here Regards. -- Sriram ^{speak up} 13:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Subroto01.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:10, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 03:38, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, would you mind reverting as your concerns may have been resolved. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 05:58, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Done there —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 07:27, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, it's been a while since you last responded at the nom page. Would you mind re-visiting? —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 04:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

2013 was one hell of a year. While it gave us some great movies (The Lunchbox, Kai Po Che!, Lootera, Bhaag Milkha Bhaag etc.) and some record-breaking blockbusters (Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani, Chennai Express, Dhoom 3), it also gave us some really sad moments (the deaths of Pran, Paul Walker, Nelson Mandela, Farooque Sheikh, re-crimilisation of homosexuality, typhoons and cycolones like Phailin and Haiyan). Nevertheless, I ain't gonna miss 2013, so have a happy 2014 ahead! Yours truly, --Jionpedia ✉ 19:16, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Pather Panchali is included in CNN-IBN's list of "100 greatest Indian films of all time", and in NDTV's list of "India's 20 greatest films". Where can these statements fit in the article? Reception or legacy? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I think all these should listed under "Legacy", as the lists were published many years after the film's release. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 09:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

 Done. Written in legacy section. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, the 3D version of Sholay has just released. So I request u to pls update the article (I do not want to mess the article, therefore asking one who made it a FA). Kailash29792 (talk) 07:35, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

This is pretty much done, except for keeping up with the latest box office figures, and maybe adding a review. I wanted to let you know that I have it listed the article at WP:TFAR. BollyJeff | talk 13:27, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

IMHO N Not done. Being the editor who contributed to the section merged into legacy, there are still many things absent from there, like the legal battle between Sippy family, reviews, BO figure etc. Soham 13:58, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Let's not disturb the article too much right now. Could you please list your desired additions and reliable sources for us to work with at Talk:Sholay? BollyJeff | talk 14:17, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Guys, I've not been able to catch up with this. Thanks all of you for working on this agenda. I think Bollyjeff has rightly said not to disturb the article too much, and rather list the desired changes in its talk page. May be after a few weeks (a few weeks after the release of 3D version) we can judge what us needed to be added. Personally I don't think a whole lot needs to be added, merely because of data is available.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:51, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Are you going to tell them about our project's 2013 accomplishments? BollyJeff | talk 02:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Subroto01.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Hey. Sorry I was away for a while from Wikipedia and could not help in the peer review for the article. I saw the review went well and article is under GOCE request. Let me know if I can be of any help for making it a FA. - Vivvt (Talk) 19:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Aurora Film Corporation at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 21:42, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Have u ever written any section named "Themes" before? If yes, u could do some major CE work in the themes section of Mullum Malarum. By "CE" i also mean removing irrelevant details (don't worry, the whole content from the source is there, but rewritten to avoid copyvio). BTW, I've replied to ur comments on the talkpage of Mullum Malarum. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

U can reply at least. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

On 21 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aurora Film Corporation, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Aurora Film Corporation, founded in 1906, produced India's first newsreel and first children's film? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aurora Film Corporation. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I recall that you once suggested me the idea of taking this article to FAC. Can you spend some time reviewing the article? —Vensatry _(Ping) 14:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Would you please review the last few edits on Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata ‎, especially the one by User:Guru-45 (including his recent edits). Diptanshu^Talk 11:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)