User talk:DrJunge

The star and dagger in the expression "(*1906 – †1973)" that you added to Stanley Smith Stevens doesn't conform to Wikipedia's Manual of Style (MoS). There's a Wikipedia MoS sub-section that covers most cases of birth and death. I see you've joined Wikipedia recently. Welcome! If you have an questions you can ask me over at my talk page. Jason Quinn (talk) 14:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took the page of Max Planck as a reference, not the English one but the German. So I mixed up the styles when updating the English version. Thanks for the hint, I have corrected my mistake.--DrJunge (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for your comments on my work with references to ARHS Bulletin. The Railway Resource Centre operated by the ARHS [see http://www.arhsnsw.com.au/resource.htm] can provide photocopies of articles from all issues of the Bulletin. Email me at bexleyboy@iprimus.com.au if you need further assistance.--Commissioner Geoff (talk) 08:18, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help, I send them an eMail. --DrJunge (talk) 10:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by:"The wikilink to smoking you inserted actually links to the classical kind of smoking which is not done in a wok.". I think the smoking done in the wok is actually very similar to a traditional form of smoking known as "hot smoking", in which the food being processed is exposed to both heat and smoke. The wok smoking technique is actually quite commonly done in asia, though preferably in places with good air flow. Sjschen (talk) 19:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged this with the PD-Art (C) tag so it is clear that I believe it falls under Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag reasoning. This means that a photograph taken in order to faithfully reproduce some 2D object of art is public domain according to Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs.

But if you take a better photograph, please substitute it, because it's quite bad resolution. Nixdorf (talk) 23:20, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DrJunge. We never made it very far on the transcription project. The struck-through articles are still the only ones which are online (to my knowledge). Scanning and transcribing turns out to be deathly boring; and, as I noted somewhere else, very few FAs feature the full complement of historical sources.

If you don't mind, may inquire why you ask? Ozob (talk) 02:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am a regular visitor of the German libraries and could look for some of the sources. I just did not want to duplicate any work you already did.--DrJunge (talk) 16:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

just wanted to say thanks for denoising my picture. your help was certainly appreciated. it seems that my camera doesn't take very good quality pictures, but at least i got something. again, thanks very much for fixing the pic. Imhavingfun42 (talk) 21:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! --DrJunge (talk) 16:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ACDC In Tacoma 2009.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:ACDC In Tacoma 2009.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:ACDC In Tacoma 2009.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You keep changing the article so it says that the AIS was first published in 1969. In 1969 the first meeting was held to create the scale. Please explain what source says otherwise. Thanks. Peter.C • talk 11:10, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you call a paper that is published in a peer reviewed journal by the head of the joint committe on injury scaling at the 1969 STAPP Car Crash conference? I included the reference to that paper with the modifications of your entry. It was somewere arround 1971 that the AAAM started to monopolizie the AIS developement. The coding table was all done by that time and the main trick of the AIS, the reduction of injury patterns into single injuries, was well established by that time. Send me a wikimail with an email adress and I can mail you the article by John D. States. Furthermore I would like to point your attention to the German language entry in Wikipedia on the AIS, again. I did all the research for that and it translates 'quite well' via the Google translator. Bye, --DrJunge (talk) 16:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Did you miss the beginning of the discussion on your discussion page? Bye, --DrJunge (talk) 17:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DrJunge. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DrJunge. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]