User talk:Callelinea

Archives

Archive 1

A tag has been placed on Newton Estape Vila requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hatoulah (talk) 07:07, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You indicated in 2008 that you contested this deletion and wanted to reedit the article but it hasn't been done and has been proposed for deletion again. You might want to contest again or edit the article.

Hi I have archived your page as requested per wp:archiveme I Hope you like it how it is feel free to revert it if you don't like it.Alexnia (talk) 11:13, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Callelinea, do you know the location (latitude and longitude coords) for the University "Marta Abreu" of Las Villas (UCLV) article? I looked on Google maps but couldn't identify it. cheers Wikityke (talk) 17:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Joe Garcia, you will be blocked from editing. Clean Hialeah (talk) 20:59, 1 September 2008 (UTC) (please stop removing content)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Joe Garcia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. I didn't know about this rule, but we've both violated it.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Joe Garcia, you will be blocked from editing.

Re-insert the material until we both discuss it on the talk page, or I will file a complaint for vandalism.

Look, where SurveyUSA got its list of voters from is irrelevant (and not at issue). I don't know how many times I have to go over this, but the district profile used by the poll differs from the census data. Go here <<http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=ac8793ef-2899-49d0-a960-a1be2ff279b6>> and look at the part labeled "Composition of Likely Voters" in question number 2. See it? In the area that asks people their race, you will see that 34% of respondents said that they were "Cuban" and 17% of respondents identified themselves as "Non-Cubans." Adding these two figures shows that the poll's sample group was 51% Hispanic. This figure differs from the 69.7% given in the Census data. This is not rocket science...Any further questions just ask before plowing ahead with edits.Clean Hialeah (talk) 23:55, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Given your edit history, I wondered if you might be interested in the LGBT WikiProject? Please have a look around, and if you are interested, sign up! :) -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 03:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marco Rubio.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 09:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Salvador Pardo Cruz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Frehley^{Space Ace} 00:10, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Anamartinez.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saw the new picture you uploaded of Pedro Zamora - thank you for that. It's an incredibly moving image. Tabercil (talk) 04:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. It's a lovely picture, and really adds to that section. :-) Nightscream (talk) 14:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On looking at it more, the only regret I have is that it's not bigger, otherwise I'd be tempted to nominate it for featured picture... Tabercil (talk) 02:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Callelinea, this article needs pictures, can you upload some decent pics? I did Christopher Columbus High School page. I am not an alumni and I don't have kids there (I wish my son could go there though). I have a friend who is a teacher there and I did the page as a birthday present for him. NancyHeise ^talk 18:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you know of a source for this - [1] ? Kevin (talk) 03:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Si no sería mucha molestia ¿podría usted echarle un vistazo al artículo Cuban Five? Con unas de las fuentes, no me parece nada neutral. Gracias de antemano.--Die4Dixie (talk) 05:04, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Callelinea, sorry to bother you but we are having a vote on the Catholic Church page regarding whether or not to include the dispute among historians regarding the Church origins. Can you please come an give us your vote so we can come to consensus? Vote is taking place here [2] Thanks! NancyHeise ^talk 03:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, gosh, wow, I haven't seen you around in a long time! Thanks for coming by! How's everything with you down in Miami? Were you in one of those parishes that got converged with another? NancyHeise ^talk 05:13, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is María del Carmen Martínez-Bordiú y Franco. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/María del Carmen Martínez-Bordiú y Franco. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• VERY STRONG KEEP. She is in society pages is a major cultural figure in Spain and France, She is in the news since the day she was boern and will be in the paperes until she duesCallelinea (talk) 08:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited! I proposed a new meeting day, time and place here [3] under the section "New Suggestion" NancyHeise ^talk 07:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to pass this along to any other South Floridians you know of on Wikipedia. NancyHeise ^talk 07:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Callelinea! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 453 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Jorge I. Dominguez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Malena Burke - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have such great sources, can you find anything on Carlos Alzugarai, Jules Loustalot, Enrique Quintana, Moisés Boudé, Domingo Romeo Jaime, Oscar Poey Bonachea, Virgilio Morales Díaz, José Borrel Tudurí, Celina Cardoso, and Angel Loustalot? --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 07:55, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting to go after these, 6 years late. Can you help?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are a member of the Wikiproject Catholicism.We would appreciate your help. Please take a look at this article about the catholic bishop Alfred_Seiwert-Fleige . Users deleted sources and tried to force their anti-catholic POV on it. They banned many people that tried to add sources. They didnt block me or Eastmain, but they deleted our sources we gave too. It appears that they don't like this catholic bishop.

Best version until now with 13 sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alfred_Seiwert-Fleige&diff=343039227&oldid=343037941

And after deleting the sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alfred_Seiwert-Fleige&action=historysubmit&diff=343481960&oldid=343039227

(At first they had planned on deleting the whole article but it didnt work)

Check out at the information on these other wikipedia articles about Seiwert Fleige and compare them to the info that is on there now. You will notice that its quite the oposite:

Pierre_Martin_Ngô_Đình_Thục

Palmarian_Catholic_Church

Sedevacantism

Clemente_Domínguez_y_Gómez

Thank you --Michelle cannon (talk) 22:18, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm user from Poland and I see that you wrote an article about Italian sculptor Angelo Zanelli. I created an article about one of his student (Józef Gosławski) few months ago. Do you have any literature with information about Zanelli's students? TR (my talk) 21:09, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Miguel A. Suárez Fernández requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dengero (talk) 05:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya... can I get some details behind the pic you uploaded of Pedro Zamora, the one that currently acts as the image in the infobox? There's a deletion request on Commons (here) and I think getting details from you on the hows of the pic might be sufficient to clear it up. Tabercil (talk) 00:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Callelinea. I need to ask you a question: Did I ever ask you about the photo of Pedro Zamora surrounded by his family in the hospital? It's been some years now, but I seem to recall that you told me that his sister gave permission to use that photo in the article in order to help spread his message, by showing the effects of AIDS. (My memory might be wrong, but I'm sure I would not have allowed that photo to be used in the article without double-checking that it was okay.) The reason I'm asking is because editor Stevenlevine1 has been removing it from the article, saying in his most recent edit summary, "his photo is highly graphic and macabre. How is this photo relevant to Pedro's life? Why would someone put up a photo of someone on their death bed for all of the public to see. Do we even know that Pedro wanted us to see this? It's in poor taste!". Can you clarify this? If so, can you speak to him on his Talk Page? Thank you very much. Nightscream (talk) 19:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it wasn't really that clear a clear memory; It was more a matter of knowing myself well enough to know that I would not have kept such a graphic, potentially controversial photo in the article without a discussion, and sorta guessed we talked about it, and that you reassured me. That's why I needed to double-check. But thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 01:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:1932 abt - Alonso del Portillo Notaria.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

If you aren't already, watch this user. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 12:43, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Calle Linea, I am brand spanking new but ready to help....Particularly if I may remain neutral..:-) Sabes....I am an author with two books on Cuba, my first trip was 1994, I have spent at least three months a year since then Soy un Yuma. I have been to every province on the island many times. I am also an Awo, so I can help with the religion area. My problem is the tech side, I am not a geek... and I hire editors, as I am lazy. However despite these shortcomings, I am confident that I can contribute. I really do not know exactly how to help and I am hoping that you might facilitate that. I decided that the best way to learn was to offer myself up for adoption....que pena. I hope I am doing this right, but probably not. Let me know how I can help on projects that you are NOT in a hurry with. Cubaking (talk) 12:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please help. On my talkpage, a very dedicated Cuban editor not proficient with English, as I am not proficient in Spanish, believes there is an issue, where I see none, but want to help. Can you take a look? There are three sections for some reason. User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#Sobre Playa Mayabeque--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 09:34, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is presently a subsection, I don't understand. It was a description in the original disambig, once the article was created, it was part of it. Rogelio removed the lead paragraph, I replaced it, then I saw what he was talking about, and removed the Scout stuff from the lead. From then I thought no problem, is there something I missed?--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 04:16, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

".... Do you happen to know the birthdate of the Senator and where and when he died? I'm doing an article on him. Thanks.. Callelinea (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2010 (UTC)....."

I will have to get back to you on this one..... My family suffers from collective amnesia..... :-) Alberto Guillermo Fariñas y Aguilera.... Albie —Preceding unsigned comment added by Albiegf13 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to get as much info as possible I have a few old pics of "Pivi", as we called him and as soon as I have some time available I get them to you somehow..... I'm not too familiar with this Wiki template, it took me a while to get to this talk feature...... How about La Mansion....? I saw that you did some work on that site.... Guillermo Aguilera my grandfather was the last resident of that property, he was married to Elena Aguilera Pollack. I was the one who made the original change to the "La Mansion" (where did they get that "fancy" name...? tacky...! Sounds like some Cuban Liberace lives there). There are many inaccuracies in that piece, however, my main reason was to let this Henry Pollack character know that "we the heirs of Elena Aguilera, have noticed his arrogant presumptions". Anyway, I don't care about "La Mansion". So far as I'm concerned, If Henry wants it, he can move into it tomorrow. Of course my cousins and brothers may think otherwise. I stayed at the house for a couple of days last November and I have to tell you, I was not impressed. It would have been better if they would have left it in ruins, it's the worst restoration I've ever seen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Albiegf13 (talk • contribs) 23:27, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Henry is pompous. I used to work with him at Congresswoman Ros-Lehtinen. I knew his grand-mother, Chita (your grand-uncle's widow). I saw "La Mansion" once when it was abandoned in 1995, went inside to explore it, since Henry had told me about it. So after Mark A. Pollack died in 1946, your grandparents moved in there? Did they live there before he died? How is it that your grandmother got the house and not Mark Jr. and his wife the "Condesa"? Yea the name sucks, afterall there are lots of other mansions in Havana. But I guess if they called it the Pollack Mansion, that would be admitting that the Pollacks might have some rights to it. I did the original article on "La Mansion" on Mark A. Pollack and now on your grandfather. I like to do articles on Cuban persons or places in Cuba. Callelinea (talk) 23:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tio Markito had a ranch, I can't remember exactly where it was, I went there a couple of times as a child with my uncle Guillo, his nephew, to ride. I also went to a house with my Tia Peppita Casuso, Mark Pollack's sister in law, somewhere in Havana, that was filled with trophies from his safaris in Africa. There was an urban legend that Tio Markito upon returning from one of his safaris, brought back a lion cub and it got loose in the lobby at the Plaza Hotel. One of my partners an old timer in NY told me that after that incident, a sign was placed at the Central Park South, entrance of the Plaza that read "NO LIONS ALOWED IN LOBBY".... I found the story amusing and almost believed it because Tio Makito was a real rascal. I didn't know him very well but I liked him a lot because he was a lot of fun and a real ball buster, in a good way.... He always made me ride the wild horses and then he and my uncle Guillo would laugh their asses off when I would get thrown. Fond memories of those guys, lots of laughs.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Albiegf13 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also: The answer to your question is yes.... My Grandmother and Grandfather lived there with their children before Mark Pollack died in 1946..... I don't know where Roberto and Chita lived, I can't remember ever having met Roberto, although I'm sure I did..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Albiegf13 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to Registro Social de la Habana 1958 they lived at:Calle 17 #201, Esquina K, Vedado. Callelinea (talk) 00:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i didn't remove the pic, it was a user by the name Arc1995, all i did was corrected the word "The" by adding the missing T. next time, you should use the revision history to check for Vandalism, i'm not the Vandal in the "Alberto Cutié wikipedia page.--Boutitbenza 69 9 (talk) 21:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Arlene Ackerman, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Arlene_Ackerman.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:40, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Arlene Ackerman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Yousou (talk) 19:41, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We absolutely have a family tree. Your best opportunity to obtain more and accurate information about the Marcano family is to contact our father Luis Eduardo Marcano who now lives in the Dominican Republic. He is now in his 80s so time is not on your side if you are seeking to interview him. He is not hard to find since he does not live too far from "La calle Luis Eduardo Marcano" Which is not far from the national palace. I can tell you that although not secret, the Marcano history and specific family information about different parts of the family is very protected and guarded information... So if you meet our father be prepared to prove you are a Marcano. As a courtesy I will point you in the correct direction. You can look for Marcanos in the "San Juan" AKA San Juan de la Maguana region of the Dominican Republic. Good luck, Harold Marcano --HaroldMarcano (talk) 11:36, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1932 abt - Alonso del Portillo Notaria.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Soundvisions1 (talk) 10:37, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Ramón Víctor Casas Viera, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramón Víctor Casas Viera until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 22:24, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Gaston I. Cantens.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 09:32, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 14:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:GabrielTraversari 1989.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 19:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Damiens.rf 19:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on an article, which you created, recently and I was wondering if you knew anything about Marino Murillo pre-life Minister of Economy and Planning. If you do, can you please add some information about it? If so thanks. --TIAYN (talk) 17:09, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Check out this discussion on WikiProject Cuba, I'm trying to drum up some teamwork and collaboration to create an article on the Cuban Liberation Army. Despite the fact they won Cuban independence in the 1890s, they don't have their own article! If you, or anyone you know would be interested, reply on WikiProject Cuba, where there's also a link to my userspace where we're drafting the new article. Thanks for reading; hope you can help with Cuban history, and help revive WikiProject Cuba!  :) NickDupree (talk) 18:25, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance that you have a ref for the deathdate? An editor has removed it as unsourced for the time being. – Connormah (talk) 20:09, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Virgin miramar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1932 abt- Alonso Gabriel Eduvides del Portillo-Marcano.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:23, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Isabel March 20 2005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1906 - Miguel Luis Tamargo-Bautista.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 23:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your patience. I tried my best to update a bit the article using the official sources included under references. Cordially, --RCarmine (talk) 04:50, 12 April 2012 (UTC) (volunteer contributor to it:Progetto:Cattolicesimo)[reply]

Note from below - this is a nice bio. I edited the first line per WP:FULLNAME, hope that's okay. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks for your many interesting BLP contributions. I was just reading a couple. But I wonder if per WP:MOSPN and other guidelines it might be good to have changes of lede and title to Spanish spellings, e.g. Ramón Sánchez-Parodi, José Arbesú, any objection to this? Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:05, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arlene Ackerman (reverend) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arlene Ackerman (reverend) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:1932 abt - Alonso del Portillo Notaria.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 19:50, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Anastasio Somoza grave 2007.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:53, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Brickell grave 2007.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Cem colon.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:14, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 12:30, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Request for documentary
	Dear Callelinea, I found a photo of you on wikipedia, which I would like to use. It would be great, if you can contact me: mm@docdays.de Thanks a lot! Mareike Murgerl (talk) 09:29, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

   User:SNUGGUMS Not to be picky but where did the year 1985 come from?  Once I figure out how to post info from Ancestry.Com/Florida Death Certificate, I will post the reference.  But since it was a minor edit and the 1985 had no citation I figured it was best to put the correct info without a citation rather than an incorrect info. Callelinea (talk) 03:55, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The closest I can find is this based off the "several years" before 1992. The problem with "several" is that it doesn't give a definitive number. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arlene Ackerman (reverend). Since you had some involvement with the Arlene Ackerman (reverend) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 22:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tirso del Junco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.state.gov/p/io/unesco/members/48837.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 18:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Nevermind, it was an USGOV source. The source was public domain, there is no copyright issue. -- AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 19:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tirso del Junco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Yes, this article contains indications of notability. However, the article is so unencyclopedically written that it just reads like a list of appointments, most of which are trivial (owing, admittedly, to it being legally copied from a public domain source). I say we blow this up and start again.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Launchballer 19:12, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tirso del Junco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tirso del Junco until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Launchballer 19:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of the Assailants of the Moncada Barracks has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Almicione (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you're operating with the anon IPs who have been adding a purported year of birth to Catherine Hickland, but you're violating one of Wikipedia's core policies, WP:BLP. May I ask where you came up with that supposed year of birth, since you're not giving any reliable-source verification whatsoever? --Tenebrae (talk) 05:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I now suspect you are using anon IPs as sockpuppets. I will address that after I have an admin intervene at the Hickland article. --Tenebrae (talk) 06:13, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Isis Finlay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any sources to show she passes WP:GNG, and merely being a pageant winner isn't sufficient.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:32, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I know you're not very active anymore, but just in case you ever come back-- I'm looking for photos for 1989 special election, and I'd take any of Ileana that are more from around that time. Let me know if you have any! Nomader (talk) 16:30, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isis Finlay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isis Finlay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:18, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I am looking to revive the Cuba WikiProject over at WP:CUB! I am contacting you because you are on the member list, but I want to see who is willing to still work on this. If you are interested, please let me know! I would love to see this project as successful as possible. Feel free to contact me with any questions - please ping me so I don't miss it! Have a great day, Snowycats (talk) 23:06, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your contributions. I'm having to downcase a lot of title-case headings in your articles, and overlinked common terms ("artist", etc). Please note our guidelines on these matters. Tony (talk) 12:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The article Tirso del Junco Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Alonso R. del Portillo with Congresswoman.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Alonso R. del Portillo. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:45, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]