User talk:AwamerT

Hello, I am not sure why you chose to mark the article I tried to create for deletion. Please help. Leanne has been very helpful to hundreds of people who have allergies/food sensitivities and are celiac (cannot eat gluten). I was in the process of adding similar blogs. Can you help me with this? What did I do wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ApplicationError (talk • contribs) 01:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I hope you enjoy this sweet treat as a friendly greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the speedy deletion tag on Odiyathur, as A7 does not apply to real places. Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 09:07, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sean. I wanted to drop you a note and politely request that you don't place welcome templates on user talk pages of users who haven't edited yet. I know you have good intentions, but a discussion a while ago suggested that we should only welcome users once they have made an edit since many people create accounts and then never sign into them again. Obviously nothing bad will come about if you keep doing it. Cheers. Syrthiss (talk) 17:31, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly for the barnstar. If you have any questions about Wikipedia I would be pleased to help you out. ... discospinster _talk 01:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I saw that you added the expert needed template to the Racket features article. I've been contributing to this and the main Racket article, so I was just curious why you added the template. Could you add something to the discussion page to explain why? Thanks. --Takikawa (talk) 01:48, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. First of all, the examples on the Racket features page are mostly from the homepage of the programming language. i.e. they were written by experts in the language. They have been run and tested with the release software. The scope of the page is similar to the Haskell features page. Or do you mean that branch articles about a single language are not allowed by the Computing WikiProject? Also, I noticed that you added an NPOV template on my talk page. Was this on accident? As far as I can tell, I don't have any NPOV edits. Cheers. --Takikawa (talk) 02:45, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AwamerT. You have new messages at Takikawa's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, AwamerT. You have new messages at Jeff G.'s talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

  — Jeff G.  ツ 02:47, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm from WikiProject Wikify. It is our job to go through all of the articles tagged with {{wikify}} and wikify them. I've noticed you tagged 1954 Rugby Union European Cup with a wikify tag, unfortunately this article is already wikified or another tag is more appropriate. The reason you tagged it incorrectly is probably due to the fact that it is not clear what the wikification process involves. Hopefully the following will give you some pointers for the future:

What Wikifying does

Wikifying an article involves 4 main things:

• Checking to see if an article duplicates existing information and tagging it with {{merge}} if it does.
• Checking an article for copyright violations and tagged with {{copyvio}} if one is found.
• Adding section headings and formatting the lead.
• Wikilinking the article.

What articles need wikification?

The best way to judge which articles need our attention is to look for the following pointers:

• Is the article divided into sections with appropriate links and section headers?
• Does the article have a lead paragraph with the title in bold?
• Does the article make adequate use of wikilinks to allow for easy navigation of the encyclopedia?

If the answer to any of these is no, add {{wikify}}

If the article is obviously a copyright violation (see Wikipedia:Copyright for details or use copyscape to check the article) then tag it with {{copyvio}} - there is no need to tag it for wikification.

What wikification does not do

We do not:

• Rewrite articles with bad grammar, punctuation or bad English - that is a job for cleanup or copyediting; use {{cleanup}} or {{copyedit}} instead
• Categorise articles - use {{uncat}} instead
• Find sources for articles with none - use {{unsourced}} instead.

I hope these pointers are helpful and thank you for taking the time to tag articles for us. If you want to find out more about wikifying please visit our project page or the talk page. You may even want to join the project. Wikification can be great fun, teaches you loads of different things and gives you loads to edit - we are currently dealing with a backlog of 0 tagged articles so your help would be appreciated!

Hey. I've removed your speedy deletion tag from Enrico Marone Cinzano because there are claims of notability in that he's won design awards. I looked the article over and was on the verge of speedy delete tagging it myself, but those claims stopped me. If you still think it should be deleted, I guess AfD would be the way to go. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 20:48, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Scorpius (Chinese astronomy) should not be merged into Traditional Chinese star names. The intent is to establish an article on each modern constellation with information on how they relate to traditional Chinese astronomy, and Traditional Chinese star names is basically a holding area until these individual articles are written. From what I can tell, there is one user who has been diligently (if sporadically) creating these new articles and removing the information from the holding area once the new article is complete. Scorpius is the latest of these, but it may not be complete, so the author hasn't erased the section from the general star names article yet. I understand how this may create confusion and is less than ideal, but the pool of people who a) know Chinese, b) know English, c) know astronomy, AND d) edit Wikipedia is really, really small. (I know this because I've been watching it happen and trying to help at the margins with what little knowledge I have.) I'll leave the merge template up for a few more days to see if there is input from other people, but my plan is to remove it after this period. BW95 (talk) 04:32, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my mind and went ahead with removing the merge template now. BW95 (talk) 04:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 19:25, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinstated this article, which was speedily deleted last night, as Martin Smith (potter). The references are inadequate, but a cursory reading of the article would reveal that it is a candidate for improvement, not deletion. A reader of Wikipedia might reasonably expect to find information in it about a Professor at the Royal College of Art with work in major museums around the world. If an editor is unfamiliar with the topic and wishes to see the article improved, the polite thing to do is to draw it to the attention of other editors who might be able to help, not to delete before anyone has a chance to comment. Marshall46 (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. A professor in the UK has a higher status than a professor in the USA. In British universities a professor is either the head of department or someone notable in their field and often both. What you call "professors" we call "lecturers". Professorial status in the UK is therefore, by definition, evidence of notability - and the Royal College of Art is the postgraduate university of the arts in the UK, so Martin Smith is a pretty big cheese. Give me time and I'll add more sources. Marshall46 (talk) 19:57, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The picture you sent me is the car man, not the ceramist. Let's see if we can find a non-copyright pic. Thanks for your help! Marshall46 (talk) 08:20, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AwamerT. You have new messages at Jeff G.'s talk page.
Message added 00:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

  — Jeff G.  ツ 00:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sean. Will add more sources as I populate the article. Most of the text sources are from the Wing homepage at http://15thstrikewing.mil.ph/ - and there are not much text articles about the Wing in any other websites. Unfortunately the site has not been updated in a while too.

Will do a 'ref' on the specific web pages. I'll give credit to web source and articles when it's due.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavinmatthew (talk • contribs) 20:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	I would like to thank you for your best on patrolling new pages and requesting to make deletions. Please reply to me and award me a barnstar for your appreciation. Thank You! Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 20:49, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AwamerT. You have new messages at Causa sui's talk page.
Message added 20:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

causa sui (talk) 20:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for the barnstar. Reviewer when it first came out was handed out like candy, I haven't seen many request posted for that but, I don't see why not unless they have just quit giving out that right. I would ask an Admin on their talk page, rather than post the request at WP:PERM. Good luck.
Mlpearc If you reply here, please leave a {{Talkback}} on my talk. 02:16, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AwamerT. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:45, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why Did you put back and CTV in Canda This is an American Show not canadian.You could make a section for international broadcasts but I think thres no use for Canada o the top. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.251.12.91 (talk) 02:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I repleid on my page. 76.93.20.11 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:30, 24 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you for reverting the personal attack against me on my talk page. --Sonez1113 (talk) 21:01, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April Fool's Day doesn't end at noon in Canada. It lasts all day. I know because I have lived in Canada all my life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonicthemeatball (talk • contribs) 21:39, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted 71.235.38.38 (talk · contribs) on both Connecticut Route 45 and Connecticut Route 55. I have restored those two edits because they were constructive. The IP converted the infobox and junction list table to use {{jct}}, which is a Good Thing. Imzadi 1979 → 01:47, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful when reverting articles. The revert on Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind that you classed as an "unexplained removal" was adequately explained using the edit summary - the section of text was already tagged as OR and had been since January 2011, allowing ample time for any discussion. The section was clearly iredeemable OR and warranted removal. Little Professor (talk) 17:16, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Was wondering why you made this reversion without any explanation? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:58, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, and thanks for taking seriously the addition of apparently unsourced stats. Just so you'll know another time, the stats for most footballers playing in England are sourced to Soccerbase, usually linked in the External links section. It should really be a general reference, but that's another story :-) If you'd clicked on that link on Mr Russell's page, you'd have seen that the stats were in fact correct. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 18:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Today, I noticed your anti-vandalism efforts, which have probably been going on for a while. Thanks for all the great work you do! Strafpeloton2 (talk) 22:38, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at Skier Dude's talk page.

Hi there AWAMER, VASCO from Portugal here,

regarding this (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:217.129.65.54), already have an account, but sometimes i "rush into things" and edit logged off, lest i forget. Thank you for your kindness though.

Attentively, keep up the good work - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello AwamerT! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for de-vandalizing my talkpage! Gwickwire (talk) 03:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome by the way! Gwickwire (talk) 04:06, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyeswikimedia.org.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AwamerT, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and  Tentinator  08:20, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cam'ronPicture.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AwamerT. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AwamerT. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AwamerT, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! - 118.136.145.202 (talk) 14:44, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

heya can u give me the template things that you have on your user page, specifically 'this user know the media is just a brainwashing tool' and 'this user hopes SOPA and PIPA will not become law' okey thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheOneAndOnlyMuffinCat (talk • contribs) 10:26, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Storm War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storm War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 22:32, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Weather Wars.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]