User talk:Augmented Seventh

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

This article should not be deleted immediately due to the lack of importance of the alleged topic because...

● Prominent musician: His confrontation with the limitations of Iranian music in terms of genre and style, and his activity in new genres and styles in Iranian music

● His activities in Iranian music and his efforts to include new styles and genres in Iranian music

Instead of rushing to delete the article, please give it time to grow

Unfortunately, Alireza Jadidi has been boycotted by the domestic media due to his taboo-breaking activities in music, and no interviews or news about him have been published. This article is worthy of being on Wikimedia. Please remove the deletion tag from the article. Kur200tv3 (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will need reliable sources to establish notability.

thanks for helping keep the encyclopedia accurate. Augmented Seventh (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

keep: Hello, I understand you. It is true that you removed his music career from the article because in your opinion there were no sources that would convince you, but his acting career has acceptable sources, such as All Movie and IMDB, etc. These are the most reliable, impartial acting websites. I will also add several Persian-language references about his acting career soon. I think the tag should be removed because his acting career is verifiable, and the article needs to be expanded, which will happen over time.

Databases like All Movie and elcinem are very reliable sources. 5.116.22.130 (talk) 20:08, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

keep : His name and acting credits are available in all movies, rotten tomatoes, tvGuide, etc. These sources are the most reputable and reliable actor review sites in the world.

I understand your sensitivity because I also adhere to Wikipedia's work policy, but too much sensitivity can cause a good article to be lost. Kur200tv3 (talk) 20:51, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you're confusing me.

notability is notability.

Source the notability with RS.

Thank you, Augmented Seventh (talk) 04:12, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

keep: Hello, I will add Persian language sources to it soon. So far, at least it has been clear to us that he is indeed an actor. Some sources just need to be added. I will put his name in the sources on Sourah. It should be noted that Sourah is the largest and most important database of Iranian actors!

I am familiar with Iran and Iranian actors. Many of the sites you cite on Wikipedia about Iranian actors are actually unreliable and create resumes for Iranian actors in exchange for money, and unfortunately, they deceive Wikipedia editors!

But this person's sources may be limited, but he is more credible than many Iranian actors. Kur200tv3 (talk) 18:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let's hope his career continues. Augmented Seventh (talk) 02:56, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

don't annoy me again. LifeIsPainHighness (talk) 23:16, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your timely response.

It's helpful.

Have a Wikipedia day, Augmented Seventh (talk) 23:26, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Streisand effect: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 09:43, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads up. I long watched the rise of automated template warnings, and found them to be outside of my skill set.

I am going to have a look at customized warnings, and readjust my notification usage, now that the cell phones are becoming all the rage.

Thanks again, Augmented Seventh (talk) 17:56, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is rude behaviour and lazy editing. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 21:23, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads up assessment.

I'm taking your well-intentioned critique into active consideration.

cordially, Augmented Seventh (talk) 22:25, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was harsh in my comment, but I found it quite insensitive to just revert, instead of taking the small effort of doing a Google-search and correct the date. Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:40, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]