Template talk:Dragon Ball games

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anime and manga: Dragon Ball This template is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles This template is supported by the Dragon Ball work group.

I've organized this template by game-system, but the result is unwieldy. We may want to consider changing this to by genre (fighting vs rpg vs side scroller) or by series (original famicom, gokuden, legacy of goku, budokai, etc.). Either way, it's a long list and most of the games don't yet have articles. I am hoping that having this list will encourage good articles on the older games. JRP 23:29, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, this list was culled from Dragon Ball (franchise) and "Dragon Ball Z Video Games" site. The latter site is excellent, but only lists games prior to 1997. It does have boxart for every game which we may be able to get permission to use. After that, I did the best I could with Amazon.com to come up with the recent games. Fortunately, 1997-2002 was a bit of a lull in DB game production as the series was dead in Japan and not yet really catching on in the US, so I may not have missed any... at least none that made it to the US. JRP 02:55, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The game "Dragon Ball Z: Legacy of Goku III" should be removed, as there isn't such a game. Also, there should be an entry for Dragon Ball GT: Transformation, as well as one for Dragon Ball: Advanced Adventure. The S

http://pspupdates.qj.net/Super-Dragon-Ball-Z-Melee-v1-0-Finale/pg/49/aid/96489

make a page on it

Why is the template so ugly?. Seriously it hardly even readable. Has anyone got an idea on how to improve the template?. --SkyWalker (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't call it ugly and have no trouble reading it. The Japanese Wikipedia has their own version of the template seen here. What do you make that? Sarujo (talk) 20:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Japanese template is ok. When i looked at the history of this template this is must better. When there is going to be more Dragon Ball games this it would uglier and in time it would be unreadable. Template should be clear and easy to read.--SkyWalker (talk) 11:38, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I think having shotened links does not help for navigation at all. I think it's much better to simply have the whole name since many of the games are from different series/brands.★Trekker (talk) 04:37, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Ball: Origins 2 is missing. *Treker must left that because he always think he removed. Benjaminkirsc (talk) 23:13, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added the actual article, because you kept linking to the redirect. Not my fault that you can't just check what you did wrong when someone tells you something. Judging by your talk page you seem to have recurring issues with navboxes, next time when someone explains something to you consider taking their advice. Also, your attempted use of intimidation looks rather poor on you.★Trekker (talk) 23:19, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Benjaminkirsc (talk) 23:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]