This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Singapore Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Gender studies Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles Cleanup : edit to see Collaborate : see /Collaboration Copyedit : edit to see Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender Expand : edit to see Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes Merge : edit to see Notability : edit to see NPOV : edit to see Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies Split : History of feminism Stubs : see Gender studies stubs Translate : see /translation Update : edit to see Verify : Riot grrrl Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 04:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In my experience, SPG's prowled along Orchard' Road'', especially near the Marriott and Paragon Mall, not the "floors of whores" at orchard towers- as far as I'm aware Orchard Towers is solely famous for the hookers ahem party hostesses, NOT SPG's.Starstylers (talk) 10:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The MissIzzy.org link appears to be obsolete. It now goes to some web hosting page. Should the link be removed? Tweisbach (talk) 05:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As this is a derogatory expression referring to an offensive stereotype, I'm editing the article to remove unreferenced statements discussing the subject from the basis of the assumption of its validity. Ordinary Person (talk) 10:53, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indians are not racially Asian, this stereotype does not apply to them

This is a stereotype of all Asian women, even Asian diaspora in western countries

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotypes_of_East_Asians_in_the_United_States#China_doll

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongoloid#Physical_features_of_Mongoloid_people

https://www.reddit.com/r/hapas/comments/58rwna/read_before_posting_the_2017_eurasian_half_asian/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.164.215.252 (talk) 10:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Asian" is not a race, there is no such race called "Asian". So you can stop making such edits, "Asian" has and never will only mean "East Asian". You need to understand that. If you don't know what "Asian" means then please travel to Asia and actually speak to real Asians and you will understand that "Asian" is never used as a race. This is a stereotype about Singaporean women and it applies to Indian Singaporean women. Who are you to decide who the sterotype is applied to? You have no right so you can stop. The stereotype is not used against other Asian women outside of Singapore and Malaysia because not all Asians wear sarongs. Indians are Asian, specially South Asian, and you need to accept and respect that because it's a fact. Like I said, travel to the Asian continent and learn the real definition of Asian. (121.220.59.45 (talk) 10:42, 4 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

IP user, you don't use Wikipedia sources or a Reddit post to prove a point and I should add that none of your sources prove any claims that you're trying to prove. Please stop making such edits to the page, I have already explained to you why you are very wrong on this issue. Again, apologies for the attacks but you need to stop. (121.220.59.45 (talk) 10:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Under the heading "Common stereotypes" the final sentence states "A Sarong party girl is commonly perceived as a fetishist who is racist and discriminates against their own community and race stemming from self-hatred, while showing a favoritism towards white people and effectively abandoning their Asian identity."(emphasis added) I don't think that "fetishist" is the appropriate term here. In the context of human sexuality, a "fetish" is something that causes sexual arousal in and of itself (such as a woman's foot, or a particular garment). In some cases, the object itself may not even need to exist with the fetishist; it is sufficient to imagine it, to cause arousal. But there is nothing about the type of woman being described in this article that suggests that she is actually sexually aroused by white men (or the idea of them), merely that she prefers them, for whatever reason(s). Unless someone cares to muster a convincing argument for why it is appropriate here, I will soon remove it. Bricology (talk) 02:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]