Jump to content

Talk:Richard Simmons

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sexuality

[edit]

The sentence saying that Richard Simmons' sexuality is a subject of speculation has been an interesting info. But now, I believe the sentence has served its purpose. Because Simmons died, the speculations regarding his sexuality will remain being only speculations. And because speculations are not facts, there's does not seem to be any need to have the sentence in the article. Hirameki (talk) 04:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While the verb tense should be updated, the sentence continues to reflect the publicly confirmed status quo and comes with helpful sources. The status might change, as it did with Sally Ride and Rip Taylor upon their deaths, or it might not. 2601:642:4600:D3B0:39E7:2447:F0C0:95B2 (talk) 05:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed to be vegetarian

[edit]

Richard Simmons claimed to be vegetarian.[1][2][3][4][5][6] Based ENTIRELY upon his own statement(s) about this (if we COULD do this), the burden of proof should be on 'denialists' to exclude this claim from this article.

The sources you have cited are generally not reliable, they would not pass WP:RS. The Washington Post have a professional obituary and it does not mention him being a vegetarian [1]. If we go by his own cookbooks, interviews, and videos he wasn't a vegetarian as he ate chicken, fish and pork. Here he is cooking and eating it on his own YouTube channel [2] [3], [4]. His cookbooks also contain many animal-based foods. For example he talks about liver pate here in one of his books [5]. Here he is promoting a chicken and salad recipe with "fresh chunks of chicken" [6]. Psychologist Guy (talk) 00:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No doubt, they are sources that say that Richard Simmons said that he was vegetarian. The digital and printed evidence - cookbooks, YouTube and other videos, are clear evidence that he was not TEACHING vegetarianism. He should not be included in the WikiProject for veganism and vegetarianism, despite his verbal and/or printed claims (though evidently erroneous). But IMO they are 'evidence' that Simmons stated (though erroneously) that he was vegetarian - yet another instance of modern disinformation. MaynardClark (talk) 01:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have checked Simmons' public Facebook page - if you go back to 2022 he was still eating chicken. If he did become a vegetarian it was in the last year or few months of his life. He definitely had no involvement with vegetarianism throughout the majority of his life as he was cooking and eating meat for decades. I have never seen him promote vegetarianism. The websites you cite all trace back to this source [7] for a quote for People (magazine) in July 2024, where he said “You know, I'm a vegetarian.” Unfortunately he gives no details about this, maybe you could enquire about it. If he became a vegetarian a few months before he died, this is not significant. It is notable and significant if someone was vegetarian for 10, 20, 30 or 40 years and we have good sources, but that is obviously not the case with Simmons. I am not convinced such trivial information is warranted for inclusion on the article. I agree that it is also possible that he was mistaken in claiming he was vegetarian. Based on what I have read he was in a bad state of mind for the last few months before his death. He wrote a lot of odd stuff on Facebook, he sounded very confused about life. Psychologist Guy (talk) 01:53, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

Details

[edit]
Block evasion
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

As for the details, I feel like they are worthy to note down, such as the time of his birth. Especially since I have added sources to prove these statements. I would say I am doing a fairly good job. At least I am trying. -- 68.104.130.88 (talk) 08:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need to report everything simply because it is sourced. We don't need to know the exact minute of his birth, or of his death, or that he fed skunks, or what his house manager thought of his body. Meters (talk) 08:38, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is it that I should add then? I thought I was doing a good job sourcing things to prove it. -- 68.104.130.88 (talk) 08:40, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing. Self-revert and wait for consensus. WP:BRD does not mean that you get to restore your contested content 5 or 6 or however many times it is now before you finally start a discussion, and it does nto mean that your contested material stays in the article while consensus is reached. You have been undone by multiple editors, and are already at the edit-warring board over this article. Continuing to edit warr is not a good look. Meters (talk) 08:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I do "nto" mean to cause a war. I was just adding verifiable sources to try and be constructive, as well as adding material that is legitimate and true to the source. Can you * not tell that I am doing my best? -- 68.104.130.88 (talk) 08:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I can't. You have been warned about edit warring before, so you should already know what it is and not to do it. You also appear to be evading more than one block. Meters (talk) 08:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would not intentionally add false information. I always am sure to check if it is sourcable or not. As for evasion, I do not think I am since I was technically allowed back. I only wish to contribute and help out, not to be warring or anything. -- 68.104.130.88 (talk) 08:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean you were "technically allowed back"? As far as I can tell, you are currently blocked on at least two accounts, and on a recent IP, as I pointed out on your talk page. I see no unblocks. If those were you then you are not allowed to edit using any IP or named account. Meters (talk) 09:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My point is that I do not wish to war with anyone. I honestly thought I was doing a good job with the sources. I felt that I was surely being helpful. -- 68.104.130.88 (talk) 09:07, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer the questions. What do you mean you were "technically allowed back"? Were you editing as user:MisterAnthony, user:TrueLegend23, or as any other currently blocked user, including the recently blocked user:68.106.251.16. Meters (talk) 09:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]