Talk:Raspberry Pi

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Raspberry Pi. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Raspberry Pi at the Reference desk.

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Introductions (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Introductions, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.IntroductionsWikipedia:WikiProject IntroductionsTemplate:WikiProject IntroductionsIntroductions articles United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Trevj (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Consumer Electronics Control#CEC|CEC]] Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

What is the source of the GFLOP values in the Simplified Model B Changelog table? I would suggest that this should be cited.

Should the Raspberry Pi Pico really be compared with the other Raspberry Pis?

The Raspberry Pi Pico is really different from the rest of the Raspberry Pis, and is much more like a microcontroller than the others. I'm not sure if comparing them in the same chart makes sense (and I believe that chart is already too long). Stevenruidigao (talk) 03:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Although I feel similarly, unfortunately the people running the Raspberry Pi foundation decided to confusingly name the Pico as a "Raspberry Pi", even though the RP2040 is more technically a microcontroller, while the rest of the Raspberries are more technically general purpose computers. Em3rgent0rdr (talk) 03:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I actually like having it in the list because occasionally I want to decide if a PICO is good enough or even better (because benefits from programmed IO state machines) for a simple task or a ZERO is needed or better (for ethernet and full unix). Was actually signing up today because all Raspi Pi versions table was incomplete for PICO not showing any IO beyond "a UART" - no mentioning of 2nd UART, I2C, SPI, PWM, ADC, PIO and USB1.1 (however dedicated USB2 and USB3 columns exist). Although RP2040 page shows all details, being able to side-by-side compare PICO, ZERO and perhaps even compute module under Raspberry PI would be nice to have. Andre Postoluck (talk) 00:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Related: The "Series and generations" section starts with "There are three series of Raspberry Pi" and the rest of the paragraph only explains "Raspberry Pi SBCs" and "Raspberry Pi Pico". It could be clarified there that the 3 generations are the 3 sections following (Raspberry Pi, Raspberry Pi Zero, Raspberry Pico) and the big-picture differences among the 3. As it is I am guessing that "Raspberry Pi SBCs" is meant to include the "Raspberry Pi" and "Raspberry Pi Zero" sections following... It's just confusing as it is currently written and I am not an experienced Wikipedia editor. Rick314 (talk) 04:14, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a HTML editor, anyone want to take this on? https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-pico-2/

Jzoch2 (talk) 17:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Having the (growing) list of models summerized in one giant table is really inaccessible especially on mobile. Horizontal scrolling to reference a particular cell relies upon remembering the vertical and horizontal headers which are out of view once you reach the cell.

there’s probably enough material for each generation (if not model) to have its own wiki article: not just specs but history, press, noteable deployments, reception, etc 146.199.169.199 (talk) 07:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]