Talk:Participatory action research

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. International development Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

/Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 366 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2021 and 14 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jerichorajninger. Peer reviewers: Daniellesori, Allibsusss.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was written from an ideological viewpoint that embraces postmodernism and social constructivism, which is why it's unintellible. It's also far longer than it needs to be.

Does it make sense to include a link to Ivory tower in the "See also" section? I note the following changes:

• 11 July 2014, Maurice Carbonaro added the link with edit summary "Added a == See also == section with * Ivory tower"
• 6 January 2016, Dhammicmarxist removed the link with edit summary "Removed vandalism"
• 26 February 2016, Yaris678 added the link with edit summary "Undid revision 698452084 by Dhammicmarxist (talk) - I don't think it was vandalism. PAR is aiming to be the opposite of ivory tower. An interesting addition to "see also""
• 1 March 2016, 108.85.134.76 removed the link with edit summary "Undid revision 706999713 by Yaris678 (talk))"

Let's discuss it here.

Yaris678 (talk) 13:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I haven't seen any discussion, so I've brought it back. My reasoning is basically the same as in my earlier edit summary - I don't think adding it was vandalism. PAR is aiming to be the opposite of ivory tower so this is an interesting addition to "see also".

Yaris678 (talk) 09:47, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]