Talk:Orkney/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: hamiltonstone (talk) 02:16, 15 February 2010 (UTC) I have gone through this article. It is neutral, stable and well referenced. It is generally well-written: I have attempted to improve it in those areas where i thought there were problems. The article appears comprehensive but concise. Images appear to be in order: all, other than the coat of arms, are free use, and the coat of arms has an appropriate fair use rationale. The map of Orkney isn't very good or readable, and in my view would have to be replaced at FA level. It is OK here. I think the writing and explanations in the sectino on geology need to be improved, but not an issue at GA. They would be an issue at FA. Nice article. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:16, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]