Talk:Ordsall Chord

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 April 2011. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: in UK Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance). Greater Manchester Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This route is so 'obvious' that I looked in the history to see why the two Manchester stations weren't been linked a 100 years ago. I suspect it was because of rival rail companies but as a reader I'm left guessing. Would someone add it please? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

100 years ago Manchester had rather more than two: but there were other connecting lines. See this diagram: the Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway (in blue) had a route from Victoria to Piccadilly (then named London Road) via Miles Platting, Ancoats Jc and Ardwick Jc. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the jpg with svg- but doubt if either are true representations. But it will be easy to fix now.--ClemRutter (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]