Jump to content

Talk:Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleMario & Luigi: Superstar Saga was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 21, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
February 1, 2008Good article nomineeListed
February 18, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

The redirect Belly Blech has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 1 § Belly Blech until a consensus is reached. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect List of characters in Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 1 § List of characters in Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga until a consensus is reached. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]

Secondary infoboxes are highly nonstandard, and a completely unreferenced infobox is certainly not beneficial either. I am not convinced of the merit behind having the infobox beyond decoration, and the section is small enough that it makes the article look worse. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:04, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:

  • The "Gameplay" section contains numerous uncited statements.
  • The remake on the 3DS has had numerous reviews, but this article is missing a "Critical reception" section for the remake.

Is anyone willing to address the above concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 22:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:59, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are numerous uncited statements, especially in the "Gameplay" section. The remake has no critical commentary, even though Metacritic indicates numerous reviews for this. Z1720 (talk) 23:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.