Talk:Fu Wuji/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Kzyx (talk · contribs) 23:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Praseodymium-141 (talk · contribs) 15:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

• There are no images - are there any available?
• The Treatise on Administrative Geography in the Book of the Later Han quotes the Dongguan Hanji as saying "in the first year of Yongxing (153), there were 3,681 xiang (鄉) and 12,443 ting (亭)". The mention of the date implies that the quotation cannot be from Fu Wuji and Huang Jing's work. Either this quotation was never part of a Treatise of Geography, or Fu Wuji's work was brought up to date from time to time. The Siku Quanshu editors, who collected fragments of the Dongguan Hanji from various sources, assigned another quotation with an even later date to the Treatise on Geography: "In the twentieth year of Jian'an (215), Hanning Commandery was reestablished." - I don't understand how this is relevant.
• There are a lot of vocabulary that are not really understandable to a casual reader: fief, terrestrial portents, tabooed.
• This article is not very long - is there any more that is known about Fu Wuji?
• Address the lead too short tag.

@Kzyx: Here are some comments to work on. ¹⁴¹Pr -_\contribs/- 07:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Praseodymium-141, Kzyx, where does this review stand? There haven't been any edits to address the review; indeed, Kzyx hasn't edited DYK since the day after nominating this article, and a DYK they nominated on their most recent day of editing, June 24, has just been closed as unsuccessful after issues went unaddressed for over a month. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've just come back from vacation. I'm probably going to fail this article as there have been no edits made as you have said. ¹⁴¹Pr -_\contribs/- 13:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]