Talk:DiskSpd

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Software: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. Microsoft Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Microsoft Windows: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

The article Diskspd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

Un-proposing for deletion, as software is considered notable, please see references^[1][2][3]. Not sure how reliable Microsoft Reasearch is to be used as a sited reference. Also see number of GitHub stars^[4] and number of downloads (49000 +)^[5].

Yes - two of the above sources are from Microsoft themself, which makes the sources alone less reliable. But in combination with the GitHub stars, the book and the publication, I believe it shows notability and significance. Also, I'm not sure how to indicate this as significance in article (siting the above references), assistance is appreciated.

--Hyperkobling (talk) 18:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]