Talk:Category (Kant)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Epistemology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Metaphysics Epistemology

After adjusting found that it's only Google Chrome that overwrites the infobox. Chrome does have a substantial share at this point, so leaving, since what's there now works in all the btowsers I support. 72.228.189.184 (talk) 15:23, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, what's with the quotation messing up the format? It makes it hard to read. I want to fix it, but I don't know enough about Wikipedia to know how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:F0D4:D300:FC66:47B9:3C0D:8B7B (talk) 02:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I rearranged the Mill quote regarding a category as "that which can be said about any and every object."Lestrade (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

I think note 2 mistakenly reads '§ 79', signifying a paragraph number that doesn't exist. It instead should read A 79 or A 80, where the quote appears and the table of categories follows in the Critique of Pure Reason by Hackett. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.92.230.14 (talk) 12:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. The reference should be to A 79 instead of § 79. I changed it.Lestrade (talk) 19:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]