Talk:.info/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Czarkoff (talk · contribs) 18:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article meets the quick-fail criteria: two {{citation needed}} tags are in place since July 2009. I put this review on hold for 3 days (until 19:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)) to see if this issue will be addressed. If the citation would be provided, the actual review will be performed; otherwise the nomination will fail. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a citation, and removed one sentence because I couldn't find a citation. oyasumi (talk) 19:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, passing to review. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

The article has a long way to go before it can become GA.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The lead was supposed to summarize article; in this article it used as an unnamed section instead. As significant textual changes are required to address this problem, the prose was not checked. Still I would note, that link to Sunrise Challenge Policy (SCP) in the infobox leads to an unrelated page. The references are malformatted, use citation templates to make references satisfy WP:MOS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The article is virtually unreferenced; I'll tag statements that has to be referenced. As of this edition the URL of reference 3 leads to location change.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Talk page contains a referenced information about the usage of .info domains for spam purposes; why doesn't article reflect it?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: