In mathematics, cellular homology in algebraic topology is a homology theory for the category of CW-complexes. It agrees with singular homology, and can provide an effective means of computing homology modules.
If
is a CW-complex with n-skeleton
, the cellular-homology modules are defined as the homology groups Hi of the cellular chain complex
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c75e/1c75ef03e0b7e5499dbc82a55be943104ad12178" alt="{\displaystyle \cdots \to {C_{n+1}}(X_{n+1},X_{n})\to {C_{n}}(X_{n},X_{n-1})\to {C_{n-1}}(X_{n-1},X_{n-2})\to \cdots ,}"
where
is taken to be the empty set.
The group
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a601d/a601da4d58c2e8000742fcb6057a2a3e6e174e0e" alt="{\displaystyle {C_{n}}(X_{n},X_{n-1})}"
is free abelian, with generators that can be identified with the
-cells of
. Let
be an
-cell of
, and let
be the attaching map. Then consider the composition
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66d87/66d8715d1cf79e1caaf19e279f8ce2d72de9e2aa" alt="{\displaystyle \chi _{n}^{\alpha \beta }:\mathbb {S} ^{n-1}\,{\stackrel {\cong }{\longrightarrow }}\,\partial e_{n}^{\alpha }\,{\stackrel {\chi _{n}^{\alpha }}{\longrightarrow }}\,X_{n-1}\,{\stackrel {q}{\longrightarrow }}\,X_{n-1}/\left(X_{n-1}\setminus e_{n-1}^{\beta }\right)\,{\stackrel {\cong }{\longrightarrow }}\,\mathbb {S} ^{n-1},}"
where the first map identifies
with
via the characteristic map
of
, the object
is an
-cell of X, the third map
is the quotient map that collapses
to a point (thus wrapping
into a sphere
), and the last map identifies
with
via the characteristic map
of
.
The boundary map
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c481e/c481e01e51e3b173efa3afb33c184176145bf5fc" alt="{\displaystyle \partial _{n}:{C_{n}}(X_{n},X_{n-1})\to {C_{n-1}}(X_{n-1},X_{n-2})}"
is then given by the formula
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e681/4e68132d2b99f162434e0719a7a150a7f6830e5d" alt="{\displaystyle {\partial _{n}}(e_{n}^{\alpha })=\sum _{\beta }\deg \left(\chi _{n}^{\alpha \beta }\right)e_{n-1}^{\beta },}"
where
is the degree of
and the sum is taken over all
-cells of
, considered as generators of
.
The following examples illustrate why computations done with cellular homology are often more efficient than those calculated by using singular homology alone.
The n-dimensional sphere Sn admits a CW structure with two cells, one 0-cell and one n-cell. Here the n-cell is attached by the constant mapping from
to 0-cell. Since the generators of the cellular chain groups
can be identified with the k-cells of Sn, we have that
for
and is otherwise trivial.
Hence for
, the resulting chain complex is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1de04/1de046b2a96c36823b6fd87f86e2f8e39d4f6d31" alt="{\displaystyle \dotsb {\overset {\partial _{n+2}}{\longrightarrow \,}}0{\overset {\partial _{n+1}}{\longrightarrow \,}}\mathbb {Z} {\overset {\partial _{n}}{\longrightarrow \,}}0{\overset {\partial _{n-1}}{\longrightarrow \,}}\dotsb {\overset {\partial _{2}}{\longrightarrow \,}}0{\overset {\partial _{1}}{\longrightarrow \,}}\mathbb {Z} {\longrightarrow \,}0,}"
but then as all the boundary maps are either to or from trivial groups, they must all be zero, meaning that the cellular homology groups are equal to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45630/45630db69ebeb13e92ea1a21c81f3718b1236fc7" alt="{\displaystyle H_{k}(S^{n})={\begin{cases}\mathbb {Z} &k=0,n\\\{0\}&{\text{otherwise.}}\end{cases}}}"
When
, it is possible to verify that the boundary map
is zero, meaning the above formula holds for all positive
.
Cellular homology can also be used to calculate the homology of the genus g surface
. The fundamental polygon of
is a
-gon which gives
a CW-structure with one 2-cell,
1-cells, and one 0-cell. The 2-cell is attached along the boundary of the
-gon, which contains every 1-cell twice, once forwards and once backwards. This means the attaching map is zero, since the forwards and backwards directions of each 1-cell cancel out. Similarly, the attaching map for each 1-cell is also zero, since it is the constant mapping from
to the 0-cell. Therefore, the resulting chain complex is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3df59/3df59144d081cb1b84f20248173fb8fee9e8ebfb" alt="{\displaystyle \cdots \to 0\xrightarrow {\partial _{3}} \mathbb {Z} \xrightarrow {\partial _{2}} \mathbb {Z} ^{2g}\xrightarrow {\partial _{1}} \mathbb {Z} \to 0,}"
where all the boundary maps are zero. Therefore, this means the cellular homology of the genus g surface is given by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6042/f60426b89ba62d59f0097719622130d449e4c9ba" alt="{\displaystyle H_{k}(\Sigma _{g})={\begin{cases}\mathbb {Z} &k=0,2\\\mathbb {Z} ^{2g}&k=1\\\{0\}&{\text{otherwise.}}\end{cases}}}"
Similarly, one can construct the genus g surface with a crosscap attached as a CW complex with one 0-cell, g 1-cells, and one 2-cell. Its homology groups are
The n-torus
can be constructed as the CW complex with one 0-cell, n 1-cells, ..., and one n-cell. The chain complex is
and all the boundary maps are zero. This can be understood by explicitly constructing the cases for
, then see the pattern.
Thus,
.
Complex projective space
[edit]
If
has no adjacent-dimensional cells, (so if it has n-cells, it has no (n-1)-cells and (n+1)-cells), then
is the free abelian group generated by its n-cells, for each
.
The complex projective space
is obtained by gluing together a 0-cell, a 2-cell, ..., and a (2n)-cell, thus
for
, and zero otherwise.
Real projective space
[edit]
The real projective space
admits a CW-structure with one
-cell
for all
.
The attaching map for these
-cells is given by the 2-fold covering map
.
(Observe that the
-skeleton
for all
.)
Note that in this case,
for all
.
To compute the boundary map
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5351/d5351e2b6d2f054aab341e30f4e7e8b0674ad75f" alt="{\displaystyle \partial _{k}\colon C_{k}(\mathbb {R} P_{k}^{n},\mathbb {R} P_{k-1}^{n})\to C_{k-1}(\mathbb {R} P_{k-1}^{n},\mathbb {R} P_{k-2}^{n}),}"
we must find the degree of the map
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bcf2/0bcf29228acf0c83e40d26887ec65def5ade6b4a" alt="{\displaystyle \chi _{k}\colon S^{k-1}{\overset {\varphi _{k}}{\longrightarrow }}\mathbb {R} P^{k-1}{\overset {q_{k}}{\longrightarrow }}\mathbb {R} P^{k-1}/\mathbb {R} P^{k-2}\cong S^{k-1}.}"
Now, note that
, and for each point
, we have that
consists of two points, one in each connected component (open hemisphere) of
.
Thus, in order to find the degree of the map
, it is sufficient to find the local degrees of
on each of these open hemispheres.
For ease of notation, we let
and
denote the connected components of
.
Then
and
are homeomorphisms, and
, where
is the antipodal map.
Now, the degree of the antipodal map on
is
.
Hence, without loss of generality, we have that the local degree of
on
is
and the local degree of
on
is
.
Adding the local degrees, we have that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4f0a/b4f0af2ed04faed26119613cc068d964577c056b" alt="{\displaystyle \deg(\chi _{k})=1+(-1)^{k}={\begin{cases}2&{\text{if }}k{\text{ is even,}}\\0&{\text{if }}k{\text{ is odd.}}\end{cases}}}"
The boundary map
is then given by
.
We thus have that the CW-structure on
gives rise to the following chain complex:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99259/99259956f9c6ea209b0a1cecfc2f5af95ce6b502" alt="{\displaystyle 0\longrightarrow \mathbb {Z} {\overset {\partial _{n}}{\longrightarrow }}\cdots {\overset {2}{\longrightarrow }}\mathbb {Z} {\overset {0}{\longrightarrow }}\mathbb {Z} {\overset {2}{\longrightarrow }}\mathbb {Z} {\overset {0}{\longrightarrow }}\mathbb {Z} \longrightarrow 0,}"
where
if
is even and
if
is odd.
Hence, the cellular homology groups for
are the following:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19301/193012c9ede9f279df4fb20f20b67bf1f38f7333" alt="{\displaystyle H_{k}(\mathbb {R} P^{n})={\begin{cases}\mathbb {Z} &{\text{if }}k=0{\text{ and }}k=n{\text{ odd}},\\\mathbb {Z} /2\mathbb {Z} &{\text{if }}0<k<n{\text{ odd,}}\\0&{\text{otherwise.}}\end{cases}}}"
One sees from the cellular chain complex that the
-skeleton determines all lower-dimensional homology modules:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/800fb/800fb95da6ac5a58cd53265477b17f80947a6be8" alt="{\displaystyle {H_{k}}(X)\cong {H_{k}}(X_{n})}"
for
.
An important consequence of this cellular perspective is that if a CW-complex has no cells in consecutive dimensions, then all of its homology modules are free. For example, the complex projective space
has a cell structure with one cell in each even dimension; it follows that for
,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7e89/f7e89240909f5fb8b4fecd37c620d42eba66571a" alt="{\displaystyle {H_{2k}}(\mathbb {CP} ^{n};\mathbb {Z} )\cong \mathbb {Z} }"
and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/847a3/847a3719e6df6c82888f35591d9e59fafa580a6f" alt="{\displaystyle {H_{2k+1}}(\mathbb {CP} ^{n};\mathbb {Z} )=0.}"
The Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence is the analogous method of computing the (co)homology of a CW-complex, for an arbitrary extraordinary (co)homology theory.
Euler characteristic
[edit]
For a cellular complex
, let
be its
-th skeleton, and
be the number of
-cells, i.e., the rank of the free module
. The Euler characteristic of
is then defined by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7024d/7024d5848924d9465be9ec64bcce0fedd2355d94" alt="{\displaystyle \chi (X)=\sum _{j=0}^{n}(-1)^{j}c_{j}.}"
The Euler characteristic is a homotopy invariant. In fact, in terms of the Betti numbers of
,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d972/3d9729ecc553ebe5fd56bd1c7baf0e76301fddac" alt="{\displaystyle \chi (X)=\sum _{j=0}^{n}(-1)^{j}\operatorname {Rank} ({H_{j}}(X)).}"
This can be justified as follows. Consider the long exact sequence of relative homology for the triple
:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b4ed/3b4ed02d06b3206e3220e2ae040093460fd44386" alt="{\displaystyle \cdots \to {H_{i}}(X_{n-1},\varnothing )\to {H_{i}}(X_{n},\varnothing )\to {H_{i}}(X_{n},X_{n-1})\to \cdots .}"
Chasing exactness through the sequence gives
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18e79/18e79fc8c32b7a4be70f85da4aa4bd7f5d9bd93b" alt="{\displaystyle \sum _{i=0}^{n}(-1)^{i}\operatorname {Rank} ({H_{i}}(X_{n},\varnothing ))=\sum _{i=0}^{n}(-1)^{i}\operatorname {Rank} ({H_{i}}(X_{n},X_{n-1}))+\sum _{i=0}^{n}(-1)^{i}\operatorname {Rank} ({H_{i}}(X_{n-1},\varnothing )).}"
The same calculation applies to the triples
,
, etc. By induction,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87705/8770596cf6bcfec7e9841ef7716447503e3c5eb1" alt="{\displaystyle \sum _{i=0}^{n}(-1)^{i}\;\operatorname {Rank} ({H_{i}}(X_{n},\varnothing ))=\sum _{j=0}^{n}\sum _{i=0}^{j}(-1)^{i}\operatorname {Rank} ({H_{i}}(X_{j},X_{j-1}))=\sum _{j=0}^{n}(-1)^{j}c_{j}.}"