Wikipedia

YIMBY

The YIMBY movement (short for "yes in my back yard") is a pro-housing social movement[1] that focuses on encouraging new housing, opposing density limits (such as single-family zoning), and supporting public transportation. It stands in opposition to NIMBY ("not in my back yard") tendencies, which generally oppose most forms of urban development in order to maintain the status quo.[2][3][4]

As a popular organized movement in the United States, the YIMBY movement began in the San Francisco Bay Area in the 2010s amid a housing affordability crisis and has subsequently become a potent political force in local, state, and national[5][6] politics in the United States.[7][8]

The YIMBY position supports increasing the supply of housing within cities where housing costs have escalated to unaffordable levels.[9] They have also supported infrastructure development projects like improving housing development[10] (especially for affordable housing[11] or trailer parks[12]), high-speed rail lines,[13][4] homeless shelters,[14] day cares,[15] schools, universities and colleges,[16][17] bike lanes, and pedestrian safety infrastructure.[3] YIMBYs often seek rezoning that would allow denser housing to be produced or the repurposing of obsolete buildings, such as shopping malls, into housing.[18][19][20] Cities that have adopted YIMBY policies have seen substantial increase in housing supply and reductions in rent.[21]

The YIMBY movement has supporters across the political spectrum, including left-leaning adherents who believe housing production is a social justice issue, free-market libertarian proponents who think the supply of housing should not be regulated by the government, and environmentalists who believe land use reform will slow down exurban development into natural areas.[22] Some YIMBYs also support efforts to shape growth in the public interest such as transit-oriented development,[23][24] green construction,[25] or expanding the role of public housing. YIMBYs argue cities can be made increasingly affordable and accessible by building more infill housing,[26][27][28]: 1  and that greenhouse gas emissions will be reduced by denser cities.[29]

History

edit

The term started being used in the 1980s as a position in opposition to NIMBYism. By 1991, YIMBY was already an established term and had been since the 1980s, understood to mean "Yes-in-many-backyards".[30]

A 1993 essay published in the Journal of the American Planning Association entitled "Planners' Alchemy, Transforming NIMBY to YIMBY: Rethinking NIMBY" used 'YIMBY' in general reference to development, not only housing development.[31]

The pro-housing YIMBY position emerged in regions experiencing unaffordable housing prices. The Guardian and Raidió Teilifís Éireann say this movement began in the San Francisco Bay area in the 2010s due to high housing costs created as a result of the local technology industry adding many more jobs to the region than the number of housing units constructed in the same time span.[32][33]

California YIMBY, the first political YIMBY group, was founded with the funding of Bay Area tech executives and companies. Dustin Moskovitz (Facebook, Asana) and his wife Cari Tuna donated $500,000 via their Open Philanthropy foundation; Nat Friedman (Xamarin, GitHub) and Zack Rosen (Pantheon Systems) donated another $500,000. Another $1 million donation came from the online payments company Stripe.[34]

Varieties of the YIMBY Movement

edit

The YIMBY movement consists of various factions with differing motivations, the debate over YIMBY policies is not limited to a single political line, with YIMBY activists aligning from across the political spectrum.[35]

Modern liberal's side

edit

Surveys of both the mass public and of elected officials show that Democrats are more likely than Republicans to support dense, multifamily housing.[36] A 2024 study of mayors and city councils shows that "electing a Democrat as mayor leads to increased multifamily housing production. These effects are concentrated in cities where councils have less power over land use changes."[36]

A major part of the political coalition aligned with the movement include environmentalists and proponents of sustainability, which support measures to legalize higher density for a variety of reasons. Urban development with higher density levels reduces the population’s need to travel by automobile, and thus, cities’ need to develop car-based infrastructure, which in the United States accounts for 29% of all greenhouse gas emissions.[37][38]

Libertarians' side

edit

Proponents of free market economics back zoning deregulation from a different perspective. They see increased housing density as a way to stimulate economic growth, foster innovation, and improve productivity by encouraging the free flow of people and ideas. In their view, deregulated housing markets enable more efficient land use, reduce housing costs, and enhance individual property rights.

A 2019 study by Chang-Tai Hsieh and Enrico Moretti in the American Economic Journal found that liberalization of land use regulations would lead to enormous productivity gains. The study estimated that strict land use regulations "lowered aggregate US growth by 36 percent from 1964 to 2009."[39][40][41]

Similarly, a study conducted by the National Bureau of Economic research also estimated that deregulating land use in the United States would lead to productivity gains, with domestic output projected to increase between 3–6% and economic well-being lifted by 3–9%.[42]

The free market faction, unlike liberals, believes that while higher-density housing should be allowed, it shouldn't be forced within existing cities solely for environmental reasons, with figures like libertarians,[43] and moderate free-market advocates like Matt Yglesias[44] opposing urban growth boundaries. They argue that restricting development to urban areas contradicts consumer preferences.[45]

Opponents

edit

Conversely, because "NIMBY" is often used as a pejorative,[46] self-identified NIMBYs are rare. But opposition to YIMBY policies comes from various sides.

Tension with leftists and tenant advocates

edit

Some socialists,[47][48] and renter advocates concerned about resident displacement and gentrification who reject market-rate housing or disagree with the view among progressive housing economists that displacement is caused by lack of enough housing.[49][50] In local elections, opposition to YIMBY policies is particularly pronounced; studies show that voter turnout among landowners nearly doubles when zoning issues are on the ballot.[51]

Opposition to market-rate housing has been referred to as "PHIMBY",[52] for "public housing in my backyard". Similarly, requiring a very high inclusionary (i.e., subsidized) percentage for new construction can result in less housing development, as subsidized homes are often more expensive to build than market-rate ones.[53]

The origins of the modern YIMBY movement are separate from existing tenants' rights groups,[54] which are suspicious of their association with young, white technology workers[55] and may be wary of disrupting the status quo, which allows incumbent groups to use discretionary planning processes to negotiate for benefits while slowing development in general.[56][57] Some have cited high vacancy rates and high rents in high-demand cities as a sign that increasing market-rate housing does not improve affordability.[58] A common misconception is the "supply skepticism", which claims new housing would draw more migration than it houses and this would worsen the housing crisis further.[59][60]

Populist Republicans and Homeowners

edit

Right-wing figures such as Donald Trump[61] and Tucker Carlson[62] have historically appealed to preservationists, local power brokers,[56] and homeowners concerned about their property values.[63]

Atypical variants

edit

Suburban residents often push for new housing developments to be concentrated in other areas[3] with higher proportions of BIPOC populations, rather than in their own neighborhoods.[64] The Bay Area's Regional Housing Needs Allocation process has been found to correlate with cities' white population percentages, resulting in fewer affordable housing allocations in areas with larger white populations.[65] In response, elected officials and planners, seeking to appease these constituents, direct development into downtown areas,[66][67][68] where higher and more expensive buildings are constructed, ultimately raising the cost per housing unit.[69]

California

edit

Evidence from California suggests that support for development is often higher when the development is less local. For example, a statewide upzoning bill will have more popular support statewide than a new apartment building will have from the immediate neighbors.[70] This can vary by state. While the national Sierra Club is in favor of infill development, local Sierra Club chapters in California oppose making development easier in their own cities.[71] A 2019 poll conducted by Lake Reach Partners for California YIMBY found that support for more infill development is higher among renters, Democrats, and Black people, though it enjoys majority support among all groups in California.[72]

Cases for upzoning or increasing density

edit

Upzoning in the absence of additional housing production appeared to raise prices in Chicago,[73] though the author disputed that this could lead to general conclusions about the affordability effects of upzoning.[74]

In Auckland, New Zealand, the introduction of upzoning led to a stimulation of the housing construction industry and an increase in the city’s supply of housing.[75]

In Portland, Oregon, an analysis of 17 years of land use deregulation policies found that individual land parcels in upzoned areas had significantly higher probabilities of development, density creation, and net additions to the Portland housing supply.[76]

Fair housing

edit

Research shows that strict land use regulations contribute to racial housing segregation in the United States.[77][78] Surveys have shown that white communities are more likely to have strict land use regulations and whites are more likely to support those regulations.[77]

Cases for abundant supply of housing

edit

Academic research has yielded some generalizable results on the effects of increasing housing supply.

Housing supply and prices

edit

Studies show that strict land use regulations reduce housing supply and raise the price of houses and land.[79][80][81][82]

Some research into the granular effects of additional housing supply shows that new housing units in hot markets may not raise the rates by which rents increase in nearby market-rate units. This has been observed in outer boroughs of New York City (though not within 3.14 miles of the Empire State Building),[83] in San Francisco (looking at housing units next to burned-out properties which were rebuilt),[84] in Helsinki,[85] and across multiple cities.[86] Additionally, in California, new market-rate housing reduced displacement and slowed rises in rent.[87] These studies do not show overall rent decreases from new housing units; in each study cited above, all housing became less affordable over time.

 
In case of constrained supply a shift in the demand curve changes the price of housing

The income elasticity of housing demand was estimated by one review in USA around 0.8 to 1.0 for renters and around 1.1 to 1.5 for owners.[88] The price elasticity of housing demand was estimated between −0.2 to −1.0 with variations for location, time delay and between renters and owners.[89] Supply can be constrained due to topography and regulations.[90]

A study published in Urban Studies in 2006 observed price trends within Canadian cities and noted very slow price drops for older housing over a period of decades; the author concluded that newly constructed housing would not become affordable in the near future, meaning that filtering was not a viable method for producing affordable housing, especially in the most expensive cities.[91] A more recent study on the subject of housing elasticity found an opposite conclusion; while newly constructed housing was often purchased at higher prices, the increase in supply at the high end of the market drove down prices everywhere else, leading to material benefits for people across all income groups.[92]

Competition between real estate developers can affect timing of real estate development and real options valuation.[93]

Improved price elasticity of new housing supply reduces the typical increases of local rents and house prices due to immigration.[94] Immigration affects demand and supply of housing.[94]

Affordability and homelessness

edit

The change in rent is inversely proportional to vacancy rates in a city, which are related to the demand for housing and the rate of construction.[95] Homelessness rates are correlated with higher rents, especially in areas where rent exceeds 30% of an area's median income.[96][97] Homelessness is driven by a number of causes, but it is more difficult to address homelessness in areas that suffer from a shortage of housing.[98]

A 2023 survey of homeless individuals in California found that among typical causes of homelessness, many people were driven into homelessness due to high rents and low incomes which could not cover the cost of rent.[99] YIMBY proponents would seek to lower rents by expanding the supply of housing. California's high housing prices are directly tied to a lack of housing supply.[100]

Regional movements

edit

Canada

edit

In Toronto, a self-styled YIMBY movement was established in 2006 by community members in response to significant development proposals in the West Queen West area, and a YIMBY festival, launched the same year, has been held annually since.[101][102] The festival's organizer stated that "YIMBYism is a community mindset that's open to change and development."[102] An advocacy group called HousingNowTO fights to maximize the number of homes when the government builds housing.[103][104] Another group, More Neighbours Toronto (MNTO), advocates for policy changes to increase the housing supply.[105]

In Vancouver, Abundant Housing Vancouver was formed in 2016 to support more housing.[106][107] In Ottawa, Make Housing Affordable was formed in 2021 to advocate for YIMBY policies.[citation needed]

Slovakia

edit

In 2014, the blog YIMBY Bratislava was created as a response to rising aversion to development in Bratislava, the capital of Slovakia. The blog informs about development in the city, promotes it, but also criticizes it. In 2018 it was renamed to YIM.BA — Yes In My Bratislava.[108] It is a private blog of one author with the fan group of its readers and fans on Facebook.

The Netherlands

edit

In 2012, the YIMBY platform RTM XL in Rotterdam was created as a response to rising aversion to the development of the Zalmhaven tower in Rotterdam. RTM XL informs about development in the city, promotes it, but also criticizes policies of the city on development and mobility. In recent years similar platforms EHVXL in Eindhoven, DHXL in The Hague and UTRXL in Utrecht were founded.

Sweden

edit

Yimby is an independent political party network founded in Stockholm in 2007, which advocates physical development, densification and promotion of urban environment with chapters in Stockholm, Gothenburg, and Uppsala.[109][citation needed] The group believes that the PBL (Plans and Constructions Act, from 1987) is a major impediment to any new construction, and should be eliminated or dramatically reformed.[110]

United Kingdom

edit

London YIMBY was set up in 2016, publishing its first report with the Adam Smith Institute in 2017[111] which received national press coverage.[112] Its members advocate a policy termed 'Better Streets'. This proposal would allow residents of individual streets to vote by a two-thirds majority to pick a design code and allow extensions or replacement buildings of up to five or six stories, allowing suburban homes to be gradually replaced by mansion blocks. This flagship policy has achieved a degree of recognition, being endorsed by former Liberal Democrat MP Sam Gyimah[113] and the former leader of the House of Commons Jacob Rees-Mogg.[114]

Other YIMBY groups have been set up in individual London boroughs and in cities suffering similar housing shortages, such as Brighton, Bristol and Edinburgh.

Members of the British YIMBY movement have been critical of established planning organisations such as the Town and Country Planning Association and the Campaign to Protect Rural England, accusing them of pursuing policies that worsen Britain's housing shortage.[115][116]

There is growing support for the YIMBY movement within the Labour party following its 2024 electoral success. Prime minister Keir Starmer has described himself as a YIMBY proponent.[117]

United States

edit

Pro-housing policies proposed by Kamala Harris during her 2024 presidential campaign were among the first to bring YIMBY ideas to the national political mainstream.[5][6][118] During his speech at the 2024 Democratic National Convention, former president Barack Obama stated "if we want to make it easier for more young people to buy a home, we need to build more units and clear away some of the outdated laws and regulations that made it harder to build homes for working people in this country."[118]

California

edit

The YIMBY movement has been particularly strong in California, a state experiencing a substantial housing shortage crisis.[119] Since 2017, YIMBY groups in California have pressured California state and its localities to pass laws to expedite housing construction, follow their own zoning laws, and reduce the stringency of zoning regulations.[119] YIMBY activists have also been active in helping to enforce state law on housing by bringing law-breaking cities to the attention of authorities.[120]

Since 2014, in response to California's housing affordability crisis, several YIMBY groups were created in the San Francisco Bay Area.[121][122] These groups have lobbied both locally and at the state level for increased housing production at all price levels, as well as using California's Housing Accountability Act (the "anti-NIMBY law")[121]: 1  [122]: 1  to sue cities when they attempt to block or downsize housing development.[121] The New York Times explained about one organization: "Members want San Francisco and its suburbs to build more of every kind of housing. More subsidized affordable housing, more market-rate rentals, more high-end condominiums."[122]

In 2017, YIMBY groups successfully lobbied for the passage of Senate Bill 35 (SB 35), which streamlines housing under certain criteria, among other "housing package" of bills.[123]

From 2018 to 2020, the lobbying group California YIMBY joined over 100 Bay Area technology industry executives in supporting state senator Scott Wiener's Senate Bills 827 and 50. The bills failed in the state senate after multiple attempts at passage.[124]: 1 [125]: 1 [126] California YIMBY received $100,000 from Yelp CEO Jeremy Stoppelman, $1 million from Irish entrepreneurs John and Patrick Collison through their company, Stripe, and $500,000 raised by Pantheon Systems CEO Zach Rosen and GitHub CEO Nat Friedman.[127][128]

YIMBY groups in California have supported the split roll effort to eliminate Proposition 13 protections for commercial properties, and supported the ballot measure known as Proposition 15, which would implement this change but failed to pass in 2020. This change would have potentially incentivized local governments to approve commercial property development (for its attendant business, payroll, sales and property tax revenue) over residential development, while providing a significant new source of funding for localities, mostly earmarked for education.[129]

Massachusetts

edit

Since 2012, several YIMBY groups were established in the greater Boston area.[130][131][132] One group argues that "...more smart housing development is the only way to retain a middle class in pricey cities like Boston and Cambridge."[133]

New York

edit

Several YIMBY groups, chiefly Open New York, have been created in New York City; according to an organizer: "In high-opportunity areas where people actually really want to live, the well-heeled, mostly white residents are able to use their perceived political power to stop the construction of basically anything," adding that low-income communities don't share that ability to keep development at bay: "Philosophically, we think that the disproportionate share of the burden of growth has been borne by low income, minority or industrial neighborhoods for far too long."[134].

In 2011, a news website called New York YIMBY was created that focuses on construction trends in New York City.[135] While this news website is not strictly related to YIMBY political movement, in an interview with Politico, the creator of the site stated: "Zoning is the problem, not development in this city. I think people don't really understand that."[136]

List of United States organizations

edit
Name Area
5th Square[137] Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
A Better Cambridge[138] Cambridge, Massachusetts
Abundant Housing LA[123] Greater Los Angeles
Abundant Housing Massachusetts[139] Massachusetts
AURA[140][141] Austin, Texas
Bend YIMBY[142] Bend, Oregon
California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund (CaRLA)[142] California
California YIMBY[124] California
East Bay for Everyone[142] San Francisco East Bay
East Bay YIMBY[142] San Francisco East Bay
Greater Greater Washington[142] Washington metropolitan area
Greenbelt Alliance San Francisco Bay Area
Grow the Richmond[142] Richmond District, San Francisco
Legal Towns Foundation New Jersey
Open New York[143] New York City
Dallas Neighbors For Housing[144] Dallas, Texas
Neighbors for More Neighbors[142] Minneapolis
People for Housing Orange County[142] Orange County, California
Peninsula for Everyone[142] San Francisco Peninsula
Portland for Everyone[142] Portland, Oregon
Santa Cruz YIMBY Santa Cruz, California
SF YIMBY[142] San Francisco
Sightline Institute[142] Pacific Northwest
Somerville YIMBY[145] Somerville, Massachusetts
Sustainable Growth Yolo Yolo County, California
SV@Home[142] Santa Clara County, California
Up for Growth[142] United States
Vermonters for People Oriented Places[146] Vermont
YIMBY Action[142][143] United States
YIMBY Democrats of San Diego County[142] San Diego County, California
YIMBY Denver[147] Denver
YIMBY Durham[142] Durham, North Carolina
YIMBY Wilmington[142] Wilmington, North Carolina
YIMBY Law[142] California
YIMBYs of Northern Virginia Northern Virginia

International

edit

In September 2018, the third annual Yes In My Backyard conference, named "YIMBYTown" occurred in Boston, hosted by that area's YIMBY community.[148] The first YIMBY conference was held in 2016 in Boulder, Colorado[149] and hosted by a group that included Boulder's former mayor, who commented that: "It is clearer than ever that if we really care about solving big national issues like inequality and climate change, tackling the lack of housing in thriving urban areas, caused largely by local zoning restrictions, is key."[150] The second annual conference was held in the San Francisco Bay Area city of Oakland, California.[151] These conferences have attracted attendees from the United States, as well as some from Canada, England, Australia, and other countries.[152][28]

YIGBY - Yes in God's Backyard

edit

In California and around the United States, at the request of coalitions of faith organizations with affordable housing developers, governments have been enacting new laws that override local zoning which previously prohibited the construction of affordable housing on church-owned land.[153][154] In 2023, California passed SB4 which legalized up to 30 housing units per acre on property owned by churches and non-profit colleges, as long as all of the units rent for below market-rate.[153] A UC Berkeley study found that this law opens up about 170,000 acres of land for potential affordable housing development across California.[153]

See also

edit
edit

Other

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Tapp, Renee (November 2021). "Introducing the YIMBYs: Renters, housing, and supply-side politics in Los Angeles". Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space. 39 (7): 1511–1528. doi:10.1177/23996544211044516.
  2. ^ Semuels, Alana (5 July 2017). "From 'Not in My Backyard' to 'Yes in My Backyard'". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 25 March 2018. Retrieved 5 July 2017. Out of a desire for more-equitable housing policy, some city dwellers have started allying with developers instead of opposing them.
  3. ^ a b c Vargas, Theresa (5 February 2023). "Perspective | Meet Nimbee, the mascot who scorns bike lanes, development and change". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 28 February 2024.
  4. ^ a b "When Suburbs Go to War With Transit". Bloomberg.com. 24 February 2023. Retrieved 28 February 2024.
  5. ^ a b Ball, Molly (15 September 2024). "Why the Pro-Housing 'Yimby' Movement Is Wading Into the Election". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 26 September 2024. Harris's proposal to build millions more homes draws fans among 'Yes in My Backyard' activists [...] Their cause, long the boutique obsession of a scattering of wonky bloggers and local activists, has suddenly moved to the political mainstream this election season. Yimby-tinged ideas are a central plank in Vice President Kamala Harris's platform to bring down prices and were prominently mentioned at last month's Democratic convention.
  6. ^ a b Siegel, Rachel; Scherer, Michael; Rodriguez, Sabrina (8 October 2024). "Kamala Harris says America needs more homes. Here's why that's different". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 9 October 2024. Retrieved 8 October 2024. Harris's approach has inched closer and closer to what's known as 'YIMBYism,' shorthand for 'Yes in My Backyard.'
  7. ^ Dougherty, Conor (2021). Golden Gates: The Housing Crisis and a Reckoning for the American Dream. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-525-56023-4.
  8. ^ Leonhardt, David (16 May 2023). "A Nascent 'YIMBY' Movement". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
  9. ^ Einstein, Katherine Levine; Glick, David M.; Palmer, Maxwell (2019). "Gentrification, Affordable Housing, and Housing Reform". Neighborhood Defenders: Participatory Politics and America's Housing Crisis. pp. 146–147. doi:10.1017/9781108769495.007. ISBN 9781108769495. S2CID 226774677. Retrieved 19 June 2020.
  10. ^ Matthew Holehouse (23 July 2014). "Boris Johnson: Nimbies pretend to care about architecture to block developments". The Telegraph. Retrieved 23 January 2016.
  11. ^ Axel-Lute, Miriam (17 November 2021). "What Is NIMBYism and How Do Affordable Housing Developers Respond to It?". Shelterforce. Retrieved 11 September 2023.
  12. ^ "Westlake council approves moratorium on manufactured homes in portion of city". 28 April 2022.
  13. ^ "Fast rail critics 'rich nimbys'". BBC News. 28 June 2011. Retrieved 9 June 2023.
  14. ^ Andrew Galvin (28 August 2015). "Anywhere but here". OC Weekly. Archived from the original on 30 January 2016. Retrieved 23 January 2016.
  15. ^ Fumano, Dan (17 August 2023). "Vancouver parents desperate for daycare slam city hall rejection". Vancouver Sun. Retrieved 17 August 2023. City hall's licensing department rejected the application in May, after a handful of neighbours expressed worries about parking, noisy kids, and traffic. The daycare was rejected a second time by the board of variance, after eight neighbours showed up to a public meeting in June to oppose it.
  16. ^ "In Berkeley, it's the NIMBYs versus the university". Le Monde.fr. 17 March 2022. Retrieved 28 February 2024.
  17. ^ "UC Berkeley forced to cap enrollment after NIMBY lawsuit". Morning Brew. Retrieved 28 February 2024.
  18. ^ Kendall, Marissa (25 June 2019). "'YIMBY neo-liberal fascists' comment, perceived threats spark backlash against Cupertino planning commissioner". The Mercury News. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
  19. ^ Ramos, Dante (14 January 2018). "Go on, California — blow up your lousy zoning laws". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
  20. ^ Bliss, Laura (2 July 2019). "Oregon's Single-Family Zoning Ban Was a 'Long Time Coming'". CityLab. Bloomberg. Retrieved 8 February 2022.
  21. ^ "YIMBY cities show how to build homes and contain rents". The Economist. 2024. ISSN 0013-0613.
  22. ^ "YIMBYs and Environmentalists Team Up at Last". www.planetizen.com. Retrieved 20 January 2024.
  23. ^ Kuntz, Tom (17 August 2009). "From Liberal NIMBY to Green YIMBY". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 20 December 2009. Retrieved 31 July 2018. There's a growing recognition that opposition to growth — in Berkeley and Oakland, for example — contributed to environmentally unfriendly suburban and exurban sprawl, and that "infill development" — dense urban housing near mass transit — is now the way to go.
  24. ^ McCormick, Erin (2 October 2017). "Rise of the yimbys: the angry millennials with a radical housing solution". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 7 November 2017. Retrieved 23 August 2018. The cause of our current shortage is 100% political," wrote Trauss in 2015, in an internet post that helped her build an army of followers to speak at public hearings, send letters and drum up support for housing on the internet.
  25. ^ McKibben, Bill (May 2023). "Yes in Our Backyards: It's time progressives like me learned to love the green building boom". Mother Jones. Retrieved 14 June 2023. Transmission lines have to cross fields; railroad tracks need to be built through rights of way. Some NIMBY passion will need to be replaced by some YIMBY enthusiasm—or at least some acquiescence.
  26. ^ Barnett, Erica (1 November 2016). "Meet the YIMBYs, Seattleites in Support of Housing Density - A new movement is saying yes to urban density in all its forms". Seattle Magazine. Archived from the original on 5 December 2016. Retrieved 5 July 2018. Although they span the political spectrum, from far left social-justice activists to hard-core libertarian free marketeers, YIMBYs generally agree that cities should be accessible and affordable for everyone, whether they own a million-dollar mansion or rent a $900-a-month studio, and whether they work as a barista or just moved to Seattle for a new job at Amazon.
  27. ^ Beyer, Scott (1 March 2017). "Build, Baby, Build: A New Housing Movement's Unofficial Motto". Governing. Archived from the original on 12 May 2017. Retrieved 5 July 2018. And its prescriptions vary thanks to the different groups that inevitably come together under its banner, such as construction industry people seeking deregulation aligning with social justice advocates who want tenant protections and affordability set-asides. Despite their different backgrounds, YIMBYs, who tend to be young and lean liberal, unify around the broad idea of adding more housing.
  28. ^ a b Stephens, Josh (21 June 2016). ""YIMBY" Movement Heats Up in Boulder". Next City. Archived from the original on 15 September 2016. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  29. ^ Boraks, David (19 September 2019). "YIMBYs say yes to urban density and affordable housing". The Charlotte Observer. Retrieved 8 February 2022.
  30. ^ DiMento, Joseph F.; Graymer, LeRoy (1991). Confronting Regional Challenges: Approaches to LULUs, Growth, and Other Vexing Governance Problems : the Sixth Annual Donald G. Hagman Commemorative Conference (Paperback). United States: The Institute. p. 61. ISBN 978-1-55844-117-0.
  31. ^ Lake, Robert W. (Winter 1993). "Planners' Alchemy Transforming NIMBY to YIMBY: Rethinking NIMBY". Journal of the American Planning Association. 59 (1): 87–93. doi:10.1080/01944369308975847.
  32. ^ McCormick, Erin (2 October 2017). "Rise of the yimbys: the angry millennials with a radical housing solution". The Guardian. San Francisco.
  33. ^ Whelan, Sean (25 February 2021). "Yimby movement aims to solve housing woes in London". RTÉ.
  34. ^ Bronstein, Zelda. "California's Yimby's". Dollars and Sense. Economic Affairs Bureau. Retrieved 12 June 2024.
  35. ^ Schuetz, Cassidy Pearson and Jenny (31 March 2022). "Where pro-housing groups are emerging". Brookings.
  36. ^ a b de Benedictis-Kessner, Justin; Jones, Daniel; Warshaw, Christopher (2024). "How partisanship in cities influences housing policy". American Journal of Political Science. doi:10.1111/ajps.12856. ISSN 0092-5853.
  37. ^ US EPA, OAR (10 September 2015). "Carbon Pollution from Transportation". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 15 March 2024.
  38. ^ Sage Van Wing (27 May 2022). "A Vision for the Future of Cities". OPB. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
  39. ^ Hsieh, Chang-Tai; Moretti, Enrico (2019). "Housing Constraints and Spatial Misallocation". American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 11 (2): 1–39. doi:10.1257/mac.20170388. ISSN 1945-7707.
  40. ^ Florida, Richard (23 May 2019). "How Housing Supply Became the Most Controversial Issue in Urbanism". Citylab. Bloomberg. Retrieved 19 June 2020.
  41. ^ Caplan, Bryan (5 April 2021). "Hsieh-Moretti on Housing Regulation: A Gracious Admission of Error". Econlib. Retrieved 3 January 2022.
  42. ^ Babalievsky, Fil; Herkenhoff, Kyle F.; Ohanian, Lee E.; Prescott, Edward C. (November 2023), The Impact of Commercial Real Estate Regulations on U.S. Output (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, doi:10.3386/w31895, retrieved 15 March 2024
  43. ^ Murphy, Timothy (25 April 2023). "To Make Housing Affordable, Prioritize Abolishing Growth Boundaries, Not Ending Density Restrictions". Reason. Reason Foundation. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
  44. ^ Yglesias, Matthew (7 September 2023). "Ten years of YIMBYism have accomplished a lot". Slow Boring. Substack. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
  45. ^ Lewyn, Michael (10 September 2019). "Does Portland's Urban Growth Boundary Worsen Sprawl?". Market Urbanism. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
  46. ^ You can't park here: it's my retreat, says ‘Nimby’ Clooney (The Times)
  47. ^ Grabar, Henry (28 June 2017). "San Francisco's Civil War". Slate.
  48. ^ Jedeed, Laura (19 September 2021). "YIMBY Movement Is Not the Answer to Housing Crisis, Grassroots Activists Say". Truthout. Retrieved 16 January 2024.
  49. ^ Zuk, Miriam; et al. (1 May 2016). "Housing Production, Filtering and Displacement: Untangling the Relationships" (PDF). UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies. Retrieved 10 February 2022.
  50. ^ Badger, Emily (21 August 2018). "The Bipartisan Cry of 'Not in My Backyard'". The New York Times.
  51. ^ Hall, Andrew (2018). "Does Homeownership Influence Political Behavior? Evidence from Administrative Data" (PDF). The Journal of Politics. 84: 351–366. doi:10.1086/714932.
  52. ^ Matthew, Zoie (1 April 2019). "You've Heard of NIMBYs—but Who Are the PHIMBYs?". Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  53. ^ Dillon, Liam; Poston, Ben; Barajas, Julia (9 April 2020). "Affordable housing can cost $1 million in California. Coronavirus could make it worse". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  54. ^ Grabar, Henry (28 June 2017). "The Only Thing San Francisco Tenant Activists Hate More Than High Rent Is Each Other". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  55. ^ Hart, Angela (17 July 2017). "'Yes in my backyard.' Silicon Valley money fuels fight against state's housing crisis". Sacramento Bee. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  56. ^ a b Grabar, Henry (13 May 2021). "Everyone Agrees California's Parking Laws Are Bad for Cities. So Why Do Planners Like Them?". Slate. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  57. ^ Britschgi, Christian (27 June 2018). "San Francisco Delays Building 4 Years in the Making Because New Apartments Will Cast Shadows?!". Reason. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  58. ^ Baskin, Morgan (14 December 2020). "Luxury Ghost Towns". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved 20 March 2023.
  59. ^ Badger, Emily (14 February 2020). "A Luxury Apartment Rises in a Poor Neighborhood. What Happens Next?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 20 March 2023.
  60. ^ "Housing Costs More Than a Matter of Supply and Demand". www.planetizen.com. Retrieved 16 January 2024.
  61. ^ Trump, Donald J.; Carson, Ben (16 August 2020). "We'll Protect America's Suburbs". Opinion. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  62. ^ Carlson, Tucker (29 June 2021). "Tucker Carlson: Abolishing the suburbs is major part of Biden administration's infrastructure plan". Fox News. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  63. ^ Fang, Limin; Stewart, Nathan; Tyndall, Justin (1 November 2023). "Homeowner politics and housing supply". Journal of Urban Economics. 138: 103608. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2023.103608. ISSN 0094-1190. S2CID 264809227.
  64. ^ Editorial Board (8 September 2023). "Seattle, Don't Turn Away From Urban Villages". The Seattle Times. The Seattle Times. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
  65. ^ Bromfield, Heather; Moore, Eli (2020). "Unfair Shares Report". Othering & Belonging Institute. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
  66. ^ Rodriguez, Michael (9 December 2019). "California's Commitment to Density Depends on a Commitment to Common Destiny". Planetizen. Planetizen. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
  67. ^ O'Toole, Randal (28 July 2006). "High Rises Protect Single-Family Homes – The Antiplanner". The Antiplanner. Thoreau Institute. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
  68. ^ Wilhelm, Austen (26 October 2023). "A ballot proposal aims to restrict tall apartment buildings in Santa Cruz". KAZU. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
  69. ^ Marohn, Charles L. (21 June 2023). "What's the Sweet Spot for Building Housing Inexpensively?". Strong Towns. Strong Towns. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
  70. ^ Dougherty 2020, chapter 2.
  71. ^ Perigo, Sasha (6 February 2020). "Why does the Sierra Club oppose affordable housing?". Curbed SF. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  72. ^ "New Poll Shows Two Thirds of California Voters Support SB 50, the More HOMES Act". California YIMBY (Press release). Sacramento. 17 May 2019. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  73. ^ Freemark, Yonah (29 January 2019). "Upzoning Chicago: Impacts of a Zoning Reform on Property Values and Housing Construction". Urban Affairs Review. 56 (3). SAGE Publications: 758–789. doi:10.1177/1078087418824672. ISSN 1078-0874. S2CID 159317550.
  74. ^ Freemark, Yonah (22 May 2019). "Housing Arguments Over SB 50 Distort My Upzoning Study. Here's How to Get Zoning Changes Right". The Frisc. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  75. ^ Greenaway-McGrevy, Ryan; Phillips, Peter C.B. (July 2023). "The impact of upzoning on housing construction in Auckland". Journal of Urban Economics. 136: 103555. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2023.103555. ISSN 0094-1190.
  76. ^ Dong, Hongwei (March 2024). "Exploring the Impacts of Zoning and Upzoning on Housing Development: A Quasi-experimental Analysis at the Parcel Level". Journal of Planning Education and Research. 44 (1): 403–415. doi:10.1177/0739456X21990728. ISSN 0739-456X.
  77. ^ a b Trounstine, Jessica (2020). "The Geography of Inequality: How Land Use Regulation Produces Segregation". American Political Science Review. 114 (2): 443–455. doi:10.1017/S0003055419000844. ISSN 0003-0554.
  78. ^ Trounstine, Jessica (2018). Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108555722. ISBN 9781108555722. S2CID 158682691. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
  79. ^ Tan, Ya; Wang, Zhi; Zhang, Qinghua (1 January 2020). "Land-use regulation and the intensive margin of housing supply". Journal of Urban Economics. Cities in China. 115: 103199. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2019.103199. ISSN 0094-1190.
  80. ^ Gyourko, Joseph; Molloy, Raven (2014). "Regulation and Housing Supply". Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Cambridge, MA. doi:10.3386/w20536.
  81. ^ Kok, Nils; Monkkonen, Paavo; Quigley, John M. (1 May 2014). "Land use regulations and the value of land and housing: An intra-metropolitan analysis". Journal of Urban Economics. 81: 136–148. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2014.03.004. ISSN 0094-1190. S2CID 67783481.
  82. ^ Been, Vicki; Ellen, Ingrid Gould; O’Regan, Katherine (2 January 2019). "Supply Skepticism: Housing Supply and Affordability". Housing Policy Debate. 29 (1): 25–40. doi:10.1080/10511482.2018.1476899. ISSN 1051-1482.
  83. ^ Li, Xiaodi (2 September 2021). "Do new housing units in your backyard raise your rents?" (PDF). Journal of Economic Geography. 22 (6). Oxford University Press (OUP): 1309–1352. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbab034. ISSN 1468-2702.
  84. ^ Pennington, Kate (28 June 2021). "Does Building New Housing Cause Displacement?: The Supply and Demand Effects of Construction in San Francisco". SSRN 3867764.
  85. ^ Bratu, Cristina; Harjunen, Oskari; Saarimaa, Tuuka (2021). "City-wide effects of new housing supply: Evidence from moving chains" (PDF). VATT Working Papers (146). Helsinki: VATT Institute for Economic Research.
  86. ^ Asquith, Brian J.; Mast, Evan; Reed, Davin (6 May 2021). "Local Effects of Large New Apartment Buildings in Low-Income Areas". The Review of Economics and Statistics. 105 (2). MIT Press - Journals: 359–375. doi:10.1162/rest_a_01055. ISSN 0034-6535. S2CID 235681729.
  87. ^ California Legislative Analyst's Office (9 February 2016). "Perspectives on Helping Low-Income Californians Afford Housing".
  88. ^ de Leeuw, Frank (1971). "The Demand for Housing: A Review of Cross-Section Evidence". The Review of Economics and Statistics. 53 (1): 1–10. doi:10.2307/1925374. JSTOR 1925374.
  89. ^ Hanushek, Eric A.; Quigley, John M. (1980). "What Is the Price Elasticity of Housing Demand?". The Review of Economics and Statistics. 62 (3): 449–54. doi:10.2307/1927113. JSTOR 1927113.
  90. ^ Saiz, Albert and Saiz, Albert, On Local Housing Supply Elasticity (July 31, 2008).
  91. ^ Skaburskis, Andrejs (1 March 2006). "Filtering, City Change and the Supply of Low-priced Housing in Canada". Urban Studies. 43 (3): 533–558. Bibcode:2006UrbSt..43..533S. doi:10.1080/00420980500533612. S2CID 155083776.
  92. ^ Wahlberg, Ulrika. "Urban facts - Urban Lab - Uppsala University, Sweden". www.urbanlab.ibf.uu.se. Retrieved 15 March 2024.
  93. ^ Bulan, Laarni; Mayer, Christopher; Somerville, C. Tsuriel (2009). "Irreversible investment, real options, and competition: Evidence from real estate development" (PDF). Journal of Urban Economics. 65 (3): 237–251. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2008.03.003. hdl:2429/50510.
  94. ^ a b Cochrane, William; Poot, Jacques (20 August 2021). "Effects of Immigration on Local Housing Markets". In Kourtit, Karima; Newbold, Bruce; Nijkamp, Peter; Partridge, Mark (eds.). The Economic Geography of Cross-Border Migration. Springer International Publishing. pp. 269–292. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48291-6_12. ISBN 978-3-030-48290-9 – via Springer Link.
  95. ^ Glaeser, Edward; Gyourko, Joseph (1 February 2018). "The Economic Implications of Housing Supply". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 32 (1). American Economic Association: 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.32.1.3. ISSN 0895-3309. S2CID 158965378.
  96. ^ Glynn, Chris; Byrne, Thomas H.; Culhane, Dennis P. (1 June 2021). "Inflection points in community-level homeless rates" (PDF). The Annals of Applied Statistics. 15 (2). Institute of Mathematical Statistics. doi:10.1214/20-aoas1414. ISSN 1932-6157. S2CID 128356047.
  97. ^ Research, Zillow (11 December 2018). "Homelessness Rises Faster Where Rent Exceeds a Third of Income". Zillow. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
  98. ^ "Homelessness and Housing". City Journal. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
  99. ^ "New study says high housing costs, low income push Californians into homelessness". AP News. 20 June 2023. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
  100. ^ Buhayar, Noah; Cannon, Christopher (6 November 2019). "How California Became America's Housing Market Nightmare". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
  101. ^ "About – yimby".
  102. ^ a b De Franco, Luca (12 November 2010). "Head Space: Christina Zeidler, YIMBY festival organizer". Spacing. Archived from the original on 20 October 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2018.
  103. ^ LeBlanc, Dave (3 September 2020). "Toronto advocacy group fights for more rental units at city-owned 'lazy land'". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  104. ^ Pelley, Lauren (12 February 2020). "As city aims to expand Housing Now program, advocates call for more 'aggressive' affordability". CBC News. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  105. ^ Chong, Joshua (14 February 2022). "In a city of NIMBYs, this community group has made it a mission to say 'yes in my backyard'". Toronto Star. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  106. ^ Macaulay, Lauren (30 March 2017). "A Home for Tomorrow? The Rise of YIMBY". IBI Group. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  107. ^ Altstedter, Ari (21 December 2021). "Angry NIMBYs are making Canada's housing shortage worse with campaigns to block developments". Bloomberg News. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  108. ^ "Prečo YIM.BA" (in Slovak).
  109. ^ Ranen, Kaj (6 October 2014). "Europe's Most Successful Economy Is Way Too Good to Be True". Next City. Archived from the original on 11 May 2015. Retrieved 24 June 2018. ...Gustav Svärd, spokesperson for the progressive urban network YIMBY, which has more than 6,000 members. ... Gustav Svärd agrees that Stockholm has many positive things going on, and has witnessed a dramatic change among politicians since YIMBY was founded in 2007.
  110. ^ Ranen, Kaj (6 October 2014). "Europe's Most Successful Economy Is Way Too Good to Be True". Next City. Archived from the original on 11 May 2015. Retrieved 24 June 2018. Svärd wants to completely rethink the PBL structure. "The PBL was basically shaped to prevent new developments, and it makes it virtually impossible to create truly connected urban fabrics. We need to transform, or abolish, the PBL and create real urban plans for larger areas. At the moment, every single house has to go through a massive process of bureaucracy and appeals.
  111. ^ "London Yimby 2017 report" (PDF). Adam Smith Institute.
  112. ^ Myers, John (11 August 2017). "Forget nimbys. Yimby housing policy can transform the UK – with the political will". the Guardian.
  113. ^ "If the Tories really want to provide more homes, here's what they need to do". The Daily Telegraph. 7 July 2019.
  114. ^ Rees-Mogg, Jacob; Tylecote, Radomir, eds. (2019). Raising the Roof: How to solve the UK's housing crisis (PDF). Institute of Economic Affairs; Do Sustainability. ISBN 978-0-255-36783-7.
  115. ^ Watling, Sam; Bhandari, Bishal (30 July 2019). "Which four-letter acronym is worse for the housing crisis – the CPRE or the TCPA?". CityMetric.
  116. ^ Watling, Sam; Bhandari, Bishal (12 April 2019). "When did the CPRE start hating houses?". CityMetric.
  117. ^ Elgot, Jessica; Duncan, Pamela (15 September 2024). "'The moment has come': pro-building Labour yimbys are set to raise the roof". the Guardian. Retrieved 16 September 2024.
  118. ^ a b Britschgi, Christian (27 August 2024). "YIMBYs' Premature Victory Dance at the DNC". Reason. Retrieved 8 October 2024. Kamala Harris' promise to end the housing shortage and adopt rent control shows that YIMBY ideas are just one of several competing housing policy agendas within the Democratic Party.
  119. ^ a b Mai-Duc, Christine (19 April 2022). "Yimby Movement Goes Mainstream in Response to High Housing Costs". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 19 April 2022.
  120. ^ Tobias, Manuela (22 April 2022). "With more enforcement power than ever, state relies on activists to enforce duplex law". CalMatters. Retrieved 22 April 2022.
  121. ^ a b c Murphy, Katy (12 November 2017). "'Homes for human beings': Millennial-driven anti-NIMBY movement is winning with a simple message". San Jose Mercury News. Archived from the original on 23 November 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2018.
  122. ^ a b c Dougherty, Conor (16 April 2016). "In Cramped and Costly Bay Area, Cries to Build, Baby, Build". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 25 April 2016. Retrieved 2 July 2018.
  123. ^ a b Huang, Josie (31 August 2017). "Searching for solutions to SoCal's housing crisis, YIMBYs say 'yes' to development". KPCC. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  124. ^ a b Pender, Kathleen (19 April 2018). "Yelp CEO calls on Google, Facebook to help housing crisis". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on 28 April 2018. Retrieved 6 June 2018.
  125. ^ Kendall, Marisa (3 May 2018). "Stripe gives $1 million to pro-development YIMBY group tackling Bay Area housing shortage". San Jose Mercury News. Archived from the original on 9 June 2018. Retrieved 20 October 2018.
  126. ^ Portantino, Anthony J. (16 May 2019). "Senator Portantino's Statement on SB 50". California State Senate. Sacramento, California.
  127. ^ Efrati, Amir (10 July 2017). "Tech Leaders Seek Bigger Political Role With Housing Push". The Information.
  128. ^ "Stripe makes $1 million contribution to California YIMBY in support of lower-cost, high-density housing". Stripe Newsroom. 2 May 2018.
  129. ^ California Legislative Analyst's Office (3 November 2020). "Proposition 15". Propositions on the November 3, 2020 Ballot. Retrieved 3 February 2023.
  130. ^ Logan, Tim (4 May 2017). "Forget 'Not in my backyard,' YIMBY could be the new group on the rise". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on 15 May 2017. Retrieved 27 June 2018.
  131. ^ Taber, Jake (9 August 2016). "YIMBY - Yes In My Back Yard - Takes a Stand Against Gentrification; Group advocates creating more affordable housing to meet demand for urban living". Metro.Us/Boston. Archived from the original on 14 August 2016. Retrieved 27 June 2018.
  132. ^ Kanson-Benanav, Jesse (29 September 2015). "Guest Column: How to keep Cambridge affordable". Cambridge Chronicle. Archived from the original on 24 October 2015. Retrieved 28 June 2018.
  133. ^ Logan, Tim (24 June 2016). "Jesse Kanson-Benanav: Community organizing, with a focus on housing". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on 25 June 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2018.
  134. ^ Raskin, Sam (17 September 2018). "The YIMBY movement comes to New York City - Open New York, the city's first self-style YIMBY group, advocates for more housing in high-opportunity areas". Curbed. Archived from the original on 3 February 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
  135. ^ Rosenblum, Constance (4 April 2014). "Sure, Build It in My Backyard". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 3 July 2018.
  136. ^ Prakash, Nidhi (29 July 2014). "Nikolai Fedak, city polemicist". Politico. Archived from the original on 30 March 2017. Retrieved 3 July 2018.
  137. ^ "Philly YIMBY". 5th Square. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
  138. ^ Hynek, Julia J.; Kuddar, Kayleigh M. (25 February 2022). "Advocates Call for New Cambridge City Manager to Prioritize Lowering Housing Costs". The Harvard Crimson. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  139. ^ Randy Shaw (21 February 2022). "A New Generation of YIMBY Organizers". Beyond Chron. Retrieved 13 May 2022.
  140. ^ Cohen, Josh (7 August 2017). "Can Austin's YIMBY Movement Go From Backyard to Ballot?". Next City. Retrieved 13 May 2022.
  141. ^ "Austin land use code rewrite stalls amid pandemic, lawsuit—but both sides say a solution is possible". austonia. 11 September 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2022.
  142. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s "Appendix A". Brookings Institution. Retrieved 15 May 2022.
  143. ^ a b Pearson, Cassidy; Schuetz, Jenny (31 March 2022). "Where pro-housing groups are emerging". Brookings Institution. Retrieved 13 May 2022.
  144. ^ "DALLAS N4H". www.dallasneighborsforhousing.org.
  145. ^ "Somerville YIMBY". Retrieved 22 August 2022.
  146. ^ "Vermonters for People Oriented Places". Retrieved 1 March 2024.
  147. ^ Kenney, Andrew (8 February 2022). "Colorado could ban 'slow-growth' policies as GOP and liberals team up at the statehouse". CPR News. Retrieved 13 May 2022.
  148. ^ "YIMBYTown".
  149. ^ Groover, Heidi (17 June 2016). "The First-Ever YIMBY Conference Is Happening Right Now". The Stranger. Archived from the original on 22 July 2016. Retrieved 4 July 2018.
  150. ^ McPhate, Mike (14 July 2017). "California Today: A Spreading 'Yimby' Movement". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 9 August 2017. Retrieved 19 July 2018.
  151. ^ Keeling, Brock; Walker, Alissa (20 July 2017). "Can a grassroots movement fix urban housing shortages?". Curbed. Archived from the original on 21 August 2017. Retrieved 19 July 2018.
  152. ^ Bergthold, Garrett (18 July 2017). "YIMBYs Build Momentum at Conference 2017". Beyond Chron. Archived from the original on 18 July 2017. Retrieved 19 July 2018.
  153. ^ a b c Dougherty, Conor (27 April 2024). "What Would Jesus Do? Tackle the Housing Crisis, Say Some Congregations. - The "Yes in God's Backyard" movement to build affordable housing on faith organizations' properties is gaining steam in California and elsewhere". New York Times. The law allows nonprofit colleges and faith-based institutions to build up to 30 units per acre in major cities and urban suburbs regardless of local zoning rules, and also fast-tracks their approval — so long as 100 percent of the units are affordable housing with below market-rate rents. In effect, the bill rezoned a large swath of the state's low-slung landscape by forcing cities to allow apartment development near single-family homes.
  154. ^ Reidy, Patrick (29 February 2024). "Churching NIMBYs: Creating Affordable Housing on Church Property". Yale Law Journal. 133 (4): 1–81. SSRN 4744217 – via SSRN.


Further reading

edit
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=YIMBY&oldid=1262995007"