Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Months in the 1900s

The following articles have been added to Category:Months in the 1900s since the start of 2017:

• July 1968
• January 1916
• February 1916
• March 1916
• April 1916
• May 1916
• June 1916
• April 1967
• July 1916
• August 1916
• September 1916

GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 23:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Following the CfD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 March 18#Category:Months in the 1900s, the category is now being split into 10 decade subcategories: Category:Months in the 1900s (same as the original large category), Category:Months in the 1910s, Category:Months in the 1920s, Category:Months in the 1930s, Category:Months in the 1940s, Category:Months in the 1950s, Category:Months in the 1960s, Category:Months in the 1970s, Category:Months in the 1980s, and Category:Months in the 1990s. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Editors have raised the question about whether timeline entries should be in the past tense or in the historical present tense. Please see discussion at Wikipedia talk:Timeline standards#Past vs Present tense again and discuss it there. —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:57, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply