Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 October 30

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turnstyle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Description makes it come across as if the user simply found this photo online. If the user were truly the copyright holder and able to release it to public domain, one would expect a more thorough description. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:34, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BBlogoblk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• orphaned corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:74migue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader claims image to be created by him/her. No license provided and possibly non-free. ZooFari 03:44, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Casalogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• orphaned corporate logo, no source, if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder; if not legit, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spybotmyway.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• software screenshot, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 04:27, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfree. The copyright holder is Safer Networking Ltd. -Samwb123^T-C-@ 01:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Trybe cover .jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• orphaned cover art (CD?); unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 04:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gflogo 120x60.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GenF.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GMT 02.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• orphaned book cover (poster?), no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:55, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GCMKalibo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:56, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cynthia Childs&Khristal Jones.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be cropped from a promotional image of some kind. There is no reason to suggest that the uploader is the copyright owner. -FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cynthia Childs&Khristal Jones.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be cropped from a promotional image of some kind. There is no reason to suggest that the uploader is the copyright owner. -FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:15, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cynthia Childs &Khristal Jones.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be cropped from a promotional image of some kind. There is no reason to suggest that the uploader is the copyright owner. -FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:18, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• It is not a copied image. The Image is owned by Cynthia Childs of www.urbanfrugalchic.com Vijinfrugal (talk) 13:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Tanthalas39 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:40, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ion Ionescu.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• 90x90 thumbnail of a larger image from somewhere. Uploader claims to hold the rights but this appears to have been taken from another site. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:50, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Obvious web resolution image; uploader has unfortunate long history of copyright violations with false claims of being the creator and copyright holder of yoinked images. Infrogmation (talk) 17:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Tanthalas39 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:40, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Traian Ionescu.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Same as above. Source unclear, but probably not uploader's own creation. Looks like a scan from somewhere. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Another absurd claim by Vlad9. Infrogmation (talk) 18:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Tanthalas39 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:40, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ion Oblemenco.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a scan from a newspaper or something; clearly not uploader's own work. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:57, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I'd suggest deleting this along with any and all images by this user, Vlad9 (talk · contribs). Seems a long term blatant copyright violator, with repeated false claims despite multiple warnings. Infrogmation (talk) 18:23, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Willking1979 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:44, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GreenSeaturtle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence that Windows released this image under the license (it's one of Vista's sample pictures; see page hist) –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• If using an free sample picture of the computer is illegal, then delete it. I just didn't know.Thank you and Sorry! Jhenderson777 (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - it has been over a month and there is no OTRS email or other indication of permission to be seen. Image can be undeleted if the below permission comes to light - Peripitus (Talk) 10:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ANATROLLER ARI-100 Duct cleaning and Inspection robot.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Has a free license, but watermark says "&copy Robotics Design Inc". No evidence that copyright holder has released the image under a free license (which may be requested by following the guidelines at WP:COPYREQ). If the uploader is also the original copyright holder, see WP:DCP for info on how to confirm this. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The licence is the one specificed as i have been given the authority to release it under this licence. Anyone can go right ahead and use it, but they must give credit to the company, and to ensure that, it says the company name. If you would rather i replace the company name and C symbol with the company logo, i can do that, but either way the license is what i say it is, so there shouldn't be a problem on either of our ends.

Regards,

Canadiansteve (talk) 19:36, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are the copyright holder of the image, we need you to confirm that, to ensure that you are who you are saying that you are. We have no reason to specifically doubt your truthfulness, but one can never be too careful when dealing with copyrights. You can find information on how to confirm this at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials#Granting us permission to copy material already online... the easiest way to do this is to modify your website to indicate that the image is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. For example, on the page where the image is located on the site, place "the image <imagename> is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license." If you'd prefer not to add such text to your site, you can send an e-mail to Wikipedia as described at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - from my talk page: (User talk:Skier Dude) Skier Dude (talk) 21:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i have full permission from the creator of the robot and the picture to release this pciture under a licence that will allow anyone to use it but would require those who do so to give full credit to the company (Robotics Design Inc.) do not speedy delete it i have uploaded it becuase i am currently deliberating with a staff member if this one or the identical one with a differnt logo should be featured on the page [robot] for a duct cleaning robot —Preceding unsigned comment added by Canadiansteve (talk • contribs) 23:04, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The person who holds the copywrite doesnt have time to talk to you but i assure you that i am in constant communication with him and anything I say could just as well have come from him. Thank you. (21:04, 2 November 2009 Canadiansteve)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HZurich.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Nothing on the source site indicates it may be used this way; site terms indicate that images are explicitly copyrighted (http://www.scarletknights.com/terms.asp) Esrever ^(klaT) 20:57, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.