Wikipedia:Don't poke the bear
 | This is an essay on the conduct policy. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | This page in a nutshell: Some actions that may appear harmless or helpful, may actually be provocative and result in being growled at—or even mauled. |
Bears are lovely creatures that often hibernate and are, for the most part, non-violent. However, when poked, bears can become quite angry. As such, it's always best not to poke the bear.
Examples of poking
edit- Following editors to articles they are editing during an unrelated dispute
- Adding wikibreak/retired tags to userpages of other users without their consent
- Adding block templates to a blocked user's page or talk page if the blocking admin has not
- Having been asked not to (or otherwise knowing it is unwelcome), continuing to post on a user's talk page
- Fussing with another user's userspace
- Nominating all articles created by a user you have a dispute with for deletion
- Repeatedly informing others about past block(s) of a user you have a dispute with
- Telling an editor "I don't know how many times I have to say this" after having said it only once and receiving a reasonable response
- Suggesting an interaction ban over dispute with a new user, effectively topic-banning the established editor from their article niche
- Addressing an editor you're not on particularly good terms with as "dude"
- Implying an editor may have mental health problems with the patronizing assurance "There is no conspiracy here."
- Telling an editor holding a minority position with conviction "Perhaps you're not suited to working on a collaborative editing project."
- Supposing an editor who has irritated an Administrator is seeking "death by cop" or "suicide by Admin"
- Suggesting to others that two editors in consensus over a point of contention with you are meatpuppets or sockpuppets
- Commenting to others about a proven editor whom you don't like "Wikipedia is better off without [that user]." (or its equivalent: "[That user] is not here to help build the encyclopedia.")
- Addressing an editor as "Friend", or offering them "friendly advice", when the opposite is meant
- Dismissing a user's considered thoughts out-of-hand by calling them "a wall of text" (or equivalently: "too long; didn't read")
- Using the thank tool to spam an editor
This metaphor could mean more than you intended
editBe careful not to imply that a specific individual is a bear. In Russia "bear" may be a compliment, but elsewhere(OED) it can mean a rough or bad-mannered person and "like a bear with a sore head" means very irritable. Using "don't poke the bear" to hint that an editor is over-sensitive on a subject might not be true, and could be construed as a personal attack. You might also offend fellow editors if they think you are accusing them of "bear-baiting" – a bloodsport which involved setting dogs to attack a captive bear.(OED)
Analogous phrases
edit- The Latin phrase Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus (the motto of Hogwarts) translates as "never tickle a sleeping dragon".
- Also, Tickling the dragon's tail, in the nuclear sense.