Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yvon Dandurand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yvon Dandurand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like a run of the mill Univ Prof, except for being part of a panel that discussed the She Has a Name play, which is likely why Neelix created the whole article. Basically a coatrack for the play he promoted all over the site Legacypac (talk) 23:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:17, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The article details a collection of minor accomplishments none of which add up to notability for me. He was a university administrator for ten years [1] but not at a high enough level (such as university president) to justify notability that way, and is apparently still an associate professor [2], also not a high enough level to justify notability from the job title. So we're left with looking to other measures like research impact (WP:PROF#C1) but again I don't see enough to convince me in Google scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:16, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.