Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yorba Linda bicycle path

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted CSD-A3. Mfield (Oi!) 04:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yorba Linda bicycle path

This is a procedural relist of a bundled AfD (see here for previous discussion). The original rationale (by User:JamesBurns) stated: "Wikipedia is neither a travelguide WP:NOTTRAVEL, nor a how-to manual WP:NOTMANUAL. Articles fail to establish why these paths are particularly notable. Some of the content in these also reads like opinion pieces, eg. "The Western Balboa section is frequented by soccer players and observers, which can make cycling tedious.", "The entire path is on the beach, affording beautiful views, mixed with the hazard of beachgoing pedestrians who do not respect the boundaries of the path." Tavix (talk) 20:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 23:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete No content that I could find. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Yep, another essentially-content free placeholder. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the time being and consider later because the article is incomplete. it needs a chance to develop.DGG (talk) 05:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been that way for over 3 years. How much time do you want? Tavix (talk) 21:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this should be a candidate for speedy deletion as it has almost zero content. Article fails to establish why it is notable. JamesBurns (talk) 09:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete A3. So tagged. Article is almost content free. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.