Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sana Amanat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 18:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sana Amanat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not much coverage. Only trivial mentions. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 15:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 22:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 22:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not in the business of evaluating the notability of such figures, but articles like the first three that came up on a web search [1] [2] [3] are anything but "trivial mentions". – Uanfala 23:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep prominent editor with sufficient coverage for GNG Artw (talk) 23:30, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep - clearly passes GNG, as shown by Uanfala. Cjhard (talk) 23:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, covered adequately in refs. Mar4d (talk) 05:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above comments. Störm (talk) 18:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.