Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quiet Council of Krakoa (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Krakoa. As this is the second AfD with this result, the redirect has been protected. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:31, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quiet Council of Krakoa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was redirected by consensus (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quiet Council of Krakoa) two months ago but has been restored and User:Ringardiumleviossa thinks it should not be redirected again. There is no agreement and no point in further edit warring over this so bringing it here for resolution. Mccapra (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore Redirect - The previous AFD's consensus was, to quote the closer, a "clear consensus against a standalone article". If there are disagreements over the initial redirect target, that should have been addressed via discussion, particularly as the close of the previous AFD noted that it did not preclude later retargeting. Edit warring and restoring the article with no discussion is not an appropriate method of handling it. Rorshacma (talk) 18:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - First of all, I'm sorry because I still don't know few rules regarding this and thanks for informing me. I want it to keep because I'm still editting this article. Just compare the last revision before first Afd closure/redirection with latest edit. Secondly, is this article not enough to have its own page? But clearly its upto consensus to keep or redirect.

Ringardiumleviossa (talk) 09:14, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect - again, nothing has changed in the few weeks since the last AfD. Then salt to prevent recreation again.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Wikipedia is not supercruftipedia. Dronebogus (talk) 10:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.