Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profound Lore Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Randykitty (talk) 13:57, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Profound Lore Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable record label. --Viennese Waltz 13:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Canada. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 13:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Easily found plenty of sources that focus on the label and the majority of artists it signs on are notable. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 16:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which three sources are you suggesting to support the company's NCORP? Graywalls (talk) Graywalls (talk) 01:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Certainly is one of the more important indie labels in the sense used at WP:MUSIC. HadesTTW has also just added a raft of sources. Chubbles (talk) 12:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.