Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prashant Kumar (Advocate)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus is clear enough after relisting DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prashant Kumar (Advocate) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a fatal lack of spectacular coverage on this man; he appears to be just another lawyer. He is not mentioned NOR linked in any of the WIkipedia pages for the organizations he supposedly had an impact on. This page is mainly nominated for deletion via WP:ANYBIO. // Posted by larsona (Talk) // 16:58, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Clearly WP:G11, the article looks like his own CV. MarkYabloko 17:08, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  17:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  17:46, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  17:46, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per User:Human3015. This is just a non-notable lawyer using Wikipedia as a platform to advertise himself. TJRC (talk) 21:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.