Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mosto Mostapha Bousmina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nom has withdrawn. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 02:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mosto Mostapha Bousmina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable. A google search for "Mosto Mostapha Bousmina" -wikipedia retrieves six hits, none of which do much to support the claims of the article. Kingturtle (talk) 15:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Omit his middle name and you get lots of listings. See http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Mosto++Bousmina The holder of a Canada Research Chair will almost always be the subject of substantial coverage by reliable sources. --Eastmain (talk) 16:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 16:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 16:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Seems to satisfy WP:BIO and has reliable sources. It does need to be wiki'd though. Unless there is a mass of delete's after me here, I'll take a look at re-writing this over the next couple of days. --Pmedema (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Research chair, editor of academic journal, high positions in several academic societies and research committees, and several awards, albeit relatively minor. The independent NSERC biography cited in the article gives two significant advances attributed to him. The subject clearly satisfies several different WP:PROF criteria. Espresso Addict (talk) 19:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, needs improvement but seems to strongly meet WP:PROF. Suggest move to Mosto Bousmina. --Dhartung | Talk 22:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Clearly satisfies WP:PROF, per Espresso Addict's comments. Nsk92 (talk) 23:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As Dhartung suggests, it is probably a good idea to rename the article Mosto Bousmina. Nsk92 (talk) 23:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdraw - wow, you all did great work! nicely done. Kingturtle (talk) 02:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.